Or is he?
Thing is, these old farts don't know the meaning of the word 'troll'. They really don't know how to internet.
Posted on 01/19/2022 6:27:44 AM PST by David Chase
Ahead of the rally, Protzman, or Negative48 as he’s known to his followers, predicted the event would feature some major revelations. While most QAnon followers criticized Trump for talking about returning in 2024 rather than trying to overturn the 2020 election result, Protzman told his followers that something huge happened in the desert on Saturday night.
In an audio chat with his followers on Sunday, Protzman claimed that Kari Lake, the former TV anchor who is now running for Arizona governor, had just finished speaking but was brought back up on stage by Trump, in order to show people that Trump was in fact JFK in disguise.
The basis for Protzman’s unhinged claim? Trump appeared to be shorter than he should have been.
(Excerpt) Read more at vice.com ...
Or is he?
Thing is, these old farts don't know the meaning of the word 'troll'. They really don't know how to internet.
You'll have to settle for being water boy then.
#ThatsHighQualityH2O
Owner Shane Smith (20%) The Walt Disney Company (16%) A&E Networks (20%) TPG Capital (44%)
\ Soros Fund Management (10%) James Murdoch (minority stake)
You prove my point. Go polish you tin foil hat lol
Remember the paper comic “Crankshaft”?
It was based on Humblegunner - being a blunt tool myself, I can relate with him and won’t argue with him because it’s like arguing with myself - usually a no-win situation.
Thank Humblegunner for his service and carry on.
New rule:
Dumb people get two posts per thread. Your quota is up.
Good night.
Bray, thank you for defending Q readers. Learning is hard for some and fearful for others. Q is not now or ever has been an “Anon”.
Anons could be any boob who posted any “thing” on the initial chan, where Q first appeared, on a secured and private channel. Q dropped privately, with no discussion.
The questions posed by Q caused hive minds to check the question out, follow the themes and early schemes that impacted America.
With the sack removed from our brain we could discover for ourselves the under belly of our history, the dark and light in every man, and who benefited from dark victories early enough and long enough that, today, America hangs by a thread.
Ignorance by way of deception was the plan for the people’s keeping.
Other “Anons” who posted on open discussion threads about Q were not among Q, and not on the secure chan, but could be perceived as Mil, some retired, some sounded active, some foreign or domestic, who filled out certain events they had learned about, or experienced first hand. Some added information from their fathers experiences.
All this to say that seeing the word “QAnon” instantly fingers the uninformed who are no friend to Q and mostly no friend to the USA.
The friendly media whacked Q with the moniker, “QAnon”, in order to line Q up beside any head banger who wanted to post anonymously on the open channel discussion threads.
So Q takes the slings and arrows that anonymous fools, anti-semetics and even porn addicts could post on those discussion threads, about Q.
Q posted alone. Pedestrians posted as pedestrians. No one knew who they were. They are QAnons. Many were nutz.
The stupid people picked their lane. It’s hilarious on one hand and pathetic on the other. Posting against Anons (boobs) they still can’t touch Q. They haven’t laid a glove on Q, or the mysterious code, because code was targeted, and not decipherable for readers. Boobs denigrate the code phrases, because it was never meant for them. Dark humor flailing against what was learned. Hee!
Rita
“ Heres the ownership of VIce news,notice anything in particular?
Owner Shane Smith (20%) The Walt Disney Company (16%) A&E Networks (20%) TPG Capital (44%)
\ Soros Fund Management (10%) James Murdoch (minority stake)”
———————————————————————————————————————————-
So if the New York Times publishes a front page story:
“Trump did Win the 2020 Election”
We should just ignore it because 99.9% of the time we hate or disagree with what they publish?
I catch snippets of Vice News, they’re not saved in my favorites and almost every story they publish I disagree with or find misinformation.
This story has readable Twitter links from the subjects.
The subjects are known by other Anons that don’t follow them, so they’re not make believe characters.
I don’t post other Vice stories. As many of them are related to politics I don’t follow, ie; environment, taxes, immigration, etc.
However if they would publish a story about Robert Malone (positive or negative) that would be of interest to me and others here.
But I do understand your concern of the source.
Thank you for your comment.
Your editorial.
Bagster is a ninja-level troll. And what does that say about those who allow themselves to regularly get spanked by the guy who rappels down from the ceiling in these threads to hit you with his rhetorical throwing stars?
Your mama.
Over in The Forbidden City where Q posted, after years and over 15 million "qanon's" posts, barely a mention of this prominent Q influencer:
Search for: "Michael Protzman" (59 Results)
https://qresear.ch/?q=Michael+Protzman
Search for: "Negative48" (1 Results)
https://qresear.ch/?q=Negative48
There's more "interest" shown on FR. ;)
Yet no interest in FR from the MSM and leftist hacks like Gilbert.
FR not a threat to them? At least the bumpkin' crowd isn't.
Figured you would chicken out. What a coward.
Whatever, Nancy.
I already told you I’m not going to provide you material to sneer at.
You’re not in charge of anything here, get used to it.
Put up or shut up.
“As far as democrats being the good guys and republicans being the bad gus’, that is a simpleton;s understanding.“
I am glad you agree. I wish I could remember the four hours-long(?) video I was referring to - it was linked from one of your Trust the Q Plan threads.
There was a lot of good stuff in the video that kept me watching for several hours - but about halfway through it turned into a political hit piece - “a simpleton’s understanding” as you put it.
My main criticism of the narrative in the video is that in reality there are more-than-one dimensions to the battle between liberty and tyranny - two of them reached pivotal points in the early 60s, and unfortunately, this video conflated them.
One dimension was fascist globalist bankers - robber barons - the military industrial complex - the federal reserve - the CIA - the video also called them fascists - and rightly pointed out ties to old man Bush and some other Republicans. I agree that JFK was an outsider with regard to that construct - and I don’t like Bushes at all.
But there was also another dimension the Communist threat (which was real and still is) - with regard to which Nixon was an outsider and a threat.
Here is where this video’s narrative broke down completely - in an apparent eagerness to paint any and all Republicans as being rooted in Bush fascism, it completely ignored the takeover of the Democrat Party by Marxists - and the life-long battle against that by certain Republicans
JFK had some fine moments as an outsider - especially in his rhetoric - but it is simply not accurate to conflate Richard Nixon’s anti-communist bent with the Bushes pro-fascist bent.
I’m sure you would agree - and I apologize for not being able to remember the video.
“Try to use your brain, Enumerated.”
Sure, I’ll take it for a spin if I have time later.
I think that I shall do neither.
Now what are you going to do, Jennifer?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.