Posted on 01/14/2022 10:59:18 AM PST by ransomnote
Dr. Robert Malone, who has 10 patents relating to mRNA vaccine technology under his name, and former Trump administration economic adviser Peter Navarro have come together to create a "declaration of independence" from the federal government's COVID vaccine mandate. In it, the two explain that the "quasi-vaccines" pose a significant threat to the American people than public health officials have disclosed.
"In this declaration of independence from a "Forced Universal Vaccination Policy," we hold these truths to be evident," the opinion stated, as per the Washington Times.
Malone and Navarro then argued that COVID "appears to be a bioweapon genetically engineered at the Wuhan Institute of Virology using gain-of-function technologies transferred to China by Dr. Anthony Fauci's National Institutes of Health bureaucracy and funded in part by both NIH" and the Department of Defense.
The two then declared, "No vaccine exists capable of eradicating the virus comparable to vaccines for diseases like polio and smallpox, and COVID-19 has entered a variety of animal reservoirs. At this point, it cannot be eradicated by any human vaccine."
SNIP
Malone and Navarro also pointed to how OneAmerica CEO J. Scott Davison came under fire for exposing the "overall high mortality rates they are observing in their data." According to WND, Davison, who leads a $100 billion insurance company, recently revealed that all-cause deaths have increased by up to 40% among those aged 18 to 64 compared to pre-pandemic levels.
MORE AT LINK
Meanwhile our current vaccines are basically worthless as per the Pfizer CEO!:
Pfizer CEO: Our Vaccines Offer ‘Limited, If Any Protection’
townhall.com ^ | 1/11/2022 0900 hrs et | Katie Pavlich
Posted on 1/11/2022, 10:03:58 AM by rktman
Speaking during remarks to a J.P. Morgan healthcare conference this week, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla openly stated current vaccines the company developed for Wuhan coronavirus offer “limited, if any” protection against contracting current variants of the disease.
He then encouraged booster shots.
The statement from Bourla comes as the Biden administration continues to justify vaccine mandates for federal workers, contractors and private businesses. The Supreme Court heard arguments about President Biden’s mandates for private companies and medical workers last week. A ruling is expected soon on the constitutionality of the mandates.
A number of people who have pointed out the waning efficacy of Pfizer’s vaccines, which Bourla touted last year as being “100 percent” effective against contracting or transmitting the virus, have been banned by social media companies.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com …
Gee that sounds kinda like sedition! :p
Bet Biden will sic the FBI on them too
19 of the @SenateGOP chose to punt defense of healthcare workers to SCOTUS rather than vote against funding CMS vax mandates. On February 18th, we vote again. Will at least 10 of those 19 stand up for healthcare workers or not? Simple question. #DefundTyranny #DefundCMSMandates
https://twitter.com/chiproytx/status/1482020339748159493
Why hasn’t the Senate voted on SJRes32 to overturn the CMS mandate yet???
There are still 17 Republicans who haven’t co-sponsored.
Cassidy
Collins
Cornyn
Fischer
Graham
Grassley
Hagerty
Johnson
Kennedy
Moore Capito
Murkowski
Portman
Romney
Sasse
Thune
Toomey
Young
https://twitter.com/kerpen/status/1481720996545515526
It’s time to stop the poison clot shot.
Could it be that the association of Navarro to Warp Speed and Malone as inventor of mRNA prevents them from admitting the vaccines are poison? Why do Navarro and Malone defend the jabs in any way?
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Doctors Create 'Declaration Of Independence' From Biden's Vaccine Mandates Following Supreme Court Decision, JesusIsLord wrote: |
| I frequently listen to Navarro and Malone on Bannon's War room. IMHO, they speak out of both sides of their mouth when describing the efficacy of the so-called vaccine. On one hand they praise therapeutics like ivermectin and HCQ, to which I agree. On the other hand they speak out to the dangerous side effects, VAERS death and sickness vaccine stats, and the ineffectiveness of the vaccine. Their caveat is that the vaccine should be used on those with high commodities. Why? If the vaccine is inherently dangerous - and ineffective according to Pfizer and others - why should ANYONE be taking these jabs? Could it be that the association of Navarro to Warp Speed and Malone as inventor of mRNA prevents them from admitting the vaccines are poison? Why do Navarro and Malone defend the jabs in any way? |
*
Do you recall a few months back when Biden tasked Homeland Security for monitoring/addressing "vaccine hesistancy" saying it was a 'national security risk'. I think that EO (or whatever it was) had multiple purposes, including being able to 'intervene' with anyone who says the 'vaccines' don't work. I mean, I think they wanted those people to be too afraid to, and those taking a stand (e.g., Malone, Bannon) and saying they are harmful are essentially accepting the risks - they may be accused of engaging in speech that is a national security risk. They do so anyway, and I think part of their reasoning is "Sue me - I'll show up in court with international and domestic research proving the 'vaccines' are a hazard.
But there's something going on, I think, for the high comorbiddities during this span of time when all medications that work are denied.
In reality Covid risk is similar to influenza, and traditionally that's harddest on the elderly. So the CDC denies access to all safe treatments but has in stead the deadly "CDC Covid Protocol." Now it becomes more complicated - if these people in the highest bracket of risk (multiple co-morbidities, often elderly) are denied Ivermectin/HCQ/AZ etc., there is no treatment at all but there is a signficant risk of hospitalization (wait until you sicken so much you need Oxygen). Once the CDC's deadly Covid Protocol kicks in, those elderly with comorbidities are likely at a greater risk if they are hospitalized - they can just be sequestered until they die of the 'the protocol'.
If they get the vax, they stand a chance of getting one of the 'saline/neutral injections'.
And/Or the 'case', if accused of risking national security with anti-vaccine talk, is easier to make for those without worrisome co-morbidities, "You honor, I wasn't inciting anti-vaccine hysteria and causing a threat to national security. Here are all the research papers that prove it...."
Since Witmer/ Newsom and others 'killed' nursing home residents disproportionately, with high numbers of co-mobribidities, utilizing the CDC 'Covid Protocol' and by forcing nursing homes to accept persons with respiratory infections while denying all treatments, I believe such an artificially high risk of dying exists for those with comorbidities people actually getting Covid, to the point that it can be argued that the faccine is less deadly than the CDC COvid Protocol. That's not saying much about either risk.
Bannon and Malone aren't the only ones saying it - I've previously wondered why others say that the only people who need the vax are the additional vulnerable. I think they want to give that group every chance of surviving the Plandemic and the CDC Covid Protocol is worse than the CDC 'vaccine'.
Perhaps without data to point to, high profile people (Bannon, Malone) may be more easily accused of being national security risks for advocating against the 'vaccine' for that demographic too.
p
Ivermectin is your friend.
******************************************
The Governement and Public Health Physicians mislead America:
1) mRNA vaccines DO NOT provide immunity of any kind.No antibodies.
2) mRNA vaccines do not prevent transmisson of the virus.
3) mRNA vaccines do attenuate Covid symptoms if the Covid mutant variant is vulnerable, for a limited period of 5 months ( Pfizer) to 6 or 8 months ( Moderna).
4) The mRNA vaccines do not work in the nasal cavity, in the pharnyx or in the lung, they only work in the blood stream, but give no protection to Covid involved organs.IVM does.
Thats why Ivermectin in your friend when taken within a few days of the infection or as prophylaxis.
Proof of Effectiveness of Ivermectin:
***************************************
How Ivermectin works:
There is reasonably solid evidence that ivermectin docks to the spike protein itself to prevent binding to the ACE2 receptor which is the primary pathology causing the tissue damage and clots related to SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, this is also an implication that this ability of ivermectin to disable the binding of the Spike protein including the vaccine-produced spike proteins. This binding of ivermectin to disable the spike protein is also preserved even with the newer spike protein mutations, but its activity against the original Wuhan spike protein,(the one vaccines were designed to produce) is fairly well studied at this point.
Abstract:
Background/Aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). One drug that has attracted interest is the antiparasitic compound ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone derived from the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis. We carried out a docking study to determine if ivermectin might be able to attach to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound with ACE2. Materials and Methods: We used the program AutoDock Vina Extended to perform the docking study. Results: Ivermectin docked in the region of leucine 91 of the spike and histidine 378 of the ACE2 receptor. The binding energy of ivermectin to the spike-ACE2 complex was -18 kcal/mol and binding constant was 5.8 e-08.
Conclusion: The ivermectin docking we identified may interfere with the attachment of the spike to the human cell membrane. Clinical trials now underway should determine whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for SARS-Cov2 infection.
******************************
The following video [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11Bl2v3BR2M ] explains the multiple mechanisms of the activity of Ivermectin including the ability of the body to maintain its basic defense of the cell nucleus in preserving the body’s ability to produce antiviral proteins, inhibition of RNA dependant RNA polymerase which inhibits the replication of viral RNA (possibly including that from the mRNA vaccine package), the stat 3 human signaling pathway which inhibits the production of blood clots also possibly mitigating some of the vaccines most dangerous side effects. Also discussed is the inhibition of the CD147 pathway by ivermectin which again may block the clumping of platelets due to spike protein either from the virus or possibly the vaccines.
**************************************
IN FACT these Public Health commies do not want you to know about Ivermectin, that’s why they ridicule the drug and its use at every turn and suppress the news of Ivermectin’s effectiveness.
“FRONT LINE COVID-19 CRITICAL CARE ALLIANCE
PREVENTION & TREATMENT PROTOCOLS FOR COVID-19”
****************************
How to get Ivermectin:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/how-to-get-ivermectin/
OR :
India Mart:
******************************************
No worries, they still push the fiction that the jabs are good for the elderly and vulnerable.
Good post.
I’ll add Ivermectin is now said to work early, mid and late while HCQ/AZ works if treatment is early.
A FReeper said she has used this link for other medications for at least a few years now:
https://www.alldaychemist.com/
I’ll add Ivermectin is now said to work early, mid and late while HCQ/AZ works if treatment is early.>>>
Ivermectin workls in several ways, whichi is why it can work as yoou say. It works in the blood to bind with Covid 18 spike protein, it also works in the pahrnyx and naval cavity, and also in effected organs such as the lung and kidney ( what you call later)/ All three of these occur simultaneously at the solution level of 160 nanograms of IVM per liter of blood, brought by the dosage level of 0.6 mgs of IVM per kilo of body weight per day for 5 days or longer, or as loong as needed if organs are infected.
There is also a very good possibility that the chemistry of IVM brings about a binding with all spike protein in the blood including that generated by mRNA based innoculation, and then its eliminated as waste.
We need to supply ourselves by the millions.Its the only way that this pandemic can end itslef by people overcoming being infected and achieving antibodies.
BTW, thank you for the link. All sources appreciated!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.