Could it be that the association of Navarro to Warp Speed and Malone as inventor of mRNA prevents them from admitting the vaccines are poison? Why do Navarro and Malone defend the jabs in any way?
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Doctors Create 'Declaration Of Independence' From Biden's Vaccine Mandates Following Supreme Court Decision, JesusIsLord wrote: |
| I frequently listen to Navarro and Malone on Bannon's War room. IMHO, they speak out of both sides of their mouth when describing the efficacy of the so-called vaccine. On one hand they praise therapeutics like ivermectin and HCQ, to which I agree. On the other hand they speak out to the dangerous side effects, VAERS death and sickness vaccine stats, and the ineffectiveness of the vaccine. Their caveat is that the vaccine should be used on those with high commodities. Why? If the vaccine is inherently dangerous - and ineffective according to Pfizer and others - why should ANYONE be taking these jabs? Could it be that the association of Navarro to Warp Speed and Malone as inventor of mRNA prevents them from admitting the vaccines are poison? Why do Navarro and Malone defend the jabs in any way? |
*
Do you recall a few months back when Biden tasked Homeland Security for monitoring/addressing "vaccine hesistancy" saying it was a 'national security risk'. I think that EO (or whatever it was) had multiple purposes, including being able to 'intervene' with anyone who says the 'vaccines' don't work. I mean, I think they wanted those people to be too afraid to, and those taking a stand (e.g., Malone, Bannon) and saying they are harmful are essentially accepting the risks - they may be accused of engaging in speech that is a national security risk. They do so anyway, and I think part of their reasoning is "Sue me - I'll show up in court with international and domestic research proving the 'vaccines' are a hazard.
But there's something going on, I think, for the high comorbiddities during this span of time when all medications that work are denied.
In reality Covid risk is similar to influenza, and traditionally that's harddest on the elderly. So the CDC denies access to all safe treatments but has in stead the deadly "CDC Covid Protocol." Now it becomes more complicated - if these people in the highest bracket of risk (multiple co-morbidities, often elderly) are denied Ivermectin/HCQ/AZ etc., there is no treatment at all but there is a signficant risk of hospitalization (wait until you sicken so much you need Oxygen). Once the CDC's deadly Covid Protocol kicks in, those elderly with comorbidities are likely at a greater risk if they are hospitalized - they can just be sequestered until they die of the 'the protocol'.
If they get the vax, they stand a chance of getting one of the 'saline/neutral injections'.
And/Or the 'case', if accused of risking national security with anti-vaccine talk, is easier to make for those without worrisome co-morbidities, "You honor, I wasn't inciting anti-vaccine hysteria and causing a threat to national security. Here are all the research papers that prove it...."
Since Witmer/ Newsom and others 'killed' nursing home residents disproportionately, with high numbers of co-mobribidities, utilizing the CDC 'Covid Protocol' and by forcing nursing homes to accept persons with respiratory infections while denying all treatments, I believe such an artificially high risk of dying exists for those with comorbidities people actually getting Covid, to the point that it can be argued that the faccine is less deadly than the CDC COvid Protocol. That's not saying much about either risk.
Bannon and Malone aren't the only ones saying it - I've previously wondered why others say that the only people who need the vax are the additional vulnerable. I think they want to give that group every chance of surviving the Plandemic and the CDC Covid Protocol is worse than the CDC 'vaccine'.
Perhaps without data to point to, high profile people (Bannon, Malone) may be more easily accused of being national security risks for advocating against the 'vaccine' for that demographic too.