Mike Adams: One-Third of Vaxxed People Will Be Dead in the Next Decade

GETTR ^ | Jan 6 | Mike Adams

[RandFan]

One-Third of Vaxxed People Will Be Dead in the Next Decade

Clip...

[Albion Wilde]

“It was never a 40% jump in death. People misunderstood. It was a jump in claims filed.”

If the insurance is life insurance, then a claim is only paid if there is a death.

Don't try to use logic on reactionary denials. It chips away at time-honored freeper tradition.

[Albion Wilde]

The threat of global genocide by vaccine is absolutely real. Dissmissing this threat as crazy talk is literally putting a gun to the head of human existence. There are people who would willingly kill us all. Wake up.

As a precision shootist, you have learned that only a millimeter off at the aim point means missing the center of the target; and that the size of the miss increases exponetially with increased distance in between. Others who have never worked with precision or dynamics often cannot conceive of the range of possibilities here.

I certainly agree with you that all the ingredients for this scale of evil are present in the current situation. What none of us can know are the counterforces that may come into play, since there are also many possible avenues of interference with what appears to be either an evil plan, or a critical mass of venal stupidity nearing a tipping point.

God help us.

[Albion Wilde]

Maybe viruses are involved in the aging process.

There are theories that viruses are at the root of many illnesses, including cancer, stomach ulcers, Alzheimer's, more. There is much yet to be discovered for the benefit of humankind. It's so unfortunate that the scientific method itself is becoming gravely distorted by the global official and media misinformation about the plandemic.

[Albion Wilde]

Insurance providers say their has been a 40% jump in deaths I think this is what he is basing it on?

Statistics can tell part of the truth, but rarely the whole truth, since there are many facets to the truth in a rapidly-changing, dynamic situation.

Several on this thread have dismissed the prediction because a lot of old people took the shot, and they will die anyway within the ten years cited.

But there are other factors within that statistic, including how many elderly usually die from influenza, versus the irregularly low number of flu deaths reported last year—because hospitals were being paid by our government for covid deaths, so many flu cases were counted as covid; and many who had covid on top of very serious co-morbidities were counted as covid for the money. So those deaths need to be deducted from the total death rate of elderly for purposes of prediction.

As far as the overall death rate over ten years, what cannot be known is the degree of success governments will achieve through mandating repeated injections, year after year. Fauci is currently trying for four per year! I don't care what you inject four times a year, there are going to be increases in toxicity galore if the plandemic has its way.

Another dynamic element is the current roll-out of shots for children, toddlers and infants. This is a whole new demographic that may have different results from these past two years. What is also different is that the social impact of the plandemic has been accompanied by increases in spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, drug overdoses and in suicides, especially among teen girls. Those deaths will not be present in the covid rate-of-death stats going forward; but there is nothing to stop the plotters from introducing new strains of toxic experimental injections with each passing year.

All insurance providers, whether life insurance or health insurance, will natually try to fend off claims, deny claims and contribute to obfuscation about any covid-or vaccine-related claims, at risk of going bankrupt. Costs and consumer rates will rise; but that will be blamed on inflation, racism and global warming.

So truly, we cannot know; but we can do everything in our powers personally to overthrow the suppression of accurate, detailed information about vaccine outcomes in all age groups.

[laplata]

Thank you for that good post!

[Allegra]

Excellent post. 👏👏👏

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

— “So truly, we cannot know; but we can do everything in our powers personally to overthrow the suppression of accurate, detailed information about vaccine outcomes in all age groups.”

A sensible and measured remark.

[LanaTurnerOverdrive]

I couldn’t agree more. Go to:

NotYourGuineaPig.Com

Buy one of my NYGP baseball caps in the style of the NYPD caps. A portion of the profits will go to the nurses and first responders that got fired for refusing the vaccine.

[Paladin2]

Deaths are not causal to life insurance claims?

[DoodleBob]

If I may...

Outrageous, factually unsupportable utterances by Fauci, Bidet, et al drive me up a wall. I have lost count of the times I fired up Excel or my HP-12c or my phone calculator to validate some numeric claim or quote, and come up rejecting the object of my numerical assault. My math skills are better since Jan 2020, but my patience for sensationalism is non-existent.

Now, there is always a place for speculation. Of course, it's possible this lot of messenger RNA shots can cause nasty side-effects down the road.... as I posted elsewhere, since 2000 about 59% of vaccine clinical trials failed, with a median length of nine years. But speculation couched as "science" is wretched, regardless if it supports my team.

Many of us detest Dubya nowadays. But in 2004, you risked getting zotted if you yellow carded him. And, to be fair, Lurch was an awful alternative. So many made a political decision to look the other way at Dubya's failures and re-elect him. And I guess that was ok.

But nowadays...well...

I agree, while there are horrible people cheering for the unvaccinated to die, there are some ghouls who smile when someone who got the shots passes away. Many of us have friends and family who've had these shots, many of whom did it out of fear or to defend their livelihood. I don't want those who took the shots - including JimRob - to suffer. Taking these shots should be a voluntary decision, not with the business end of an OSHA mandate or a pink slip staring you in the face.

I think anti-vaxx sensationalism is as wrong as looking the other way at Dubya's failures in 2004. Your mileage may vary.

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

— “I think anti-vaxx sensationalism is as wrong as looking the other way at Dubya’s failures in 2004. Your mileage may vary.”

Interesting assumptions, which in general I share. But....

“Anti-vaxx” is a very large portrait compared to being skeptical about a phase three, continuing clinical trial with legal liability shields for experimental mRNA product(s), in which mandating participation in an official experiment is somehow deemed morally good while skepticism is morally bad.

I hope I haven't shown “sensationalism” in my posts of simple arithmetic and official data.

I am several times vaccinated in my life, including for the bubonic plague during the Vietnam era courtesy of the US Army. On another subject, if your HP12c is among the first, you have a somewhat historical critter. I have among my collection an HP-35 in its gray protective plastic box. We must be getting old.....

[DoodleBob]

My good FRiend I wasn't singling anyone out. And certainly not you.

For the record, there are good studies on clinical trial success/failure here and here which clearly show that these shots haven't been subject to comparable rigor. Thus, I totally get your point.

I'll even go further, and state that releasing these shots under EUAs was ok. This isn't the flu. It's a nasty virus that kills immunocompromised people disproportionately. Many people with comorbidities can and have done their weighing of pros and cons with the proviso that those shots haven't run a full race yet. It's like declaring who will win a baseball game at the end of the top half of the first inning. And that's a personal decision, and as your background shows, everyone's experience varies...that's freedom of choice, not anti-vaxx.

Mandating these shots is unconscionable. I don't care if Trump loves them or if Rand Paul (who wins 2021 Man of the Year for his gain of function questioning) hopes people get them. They're still under EUA and the declining Efficacy show the importance of long trials.

In closing, this HP 12c thread was one of the most entertaining.

[Albion Wilde]

Just a note: FR’s owner asks that freepers refrain from advertising or fund-raising on the site, other than the FReepathon itself that keeps us running.

[Albion Wilde]

I’m in favor of the decision to vaccinate being a personal decision between patient and a doctor who is actually practicing medicine, and not just a progaganda puppet for the plandemic.

The shot may be 1) the best solution for many individuals, or it may be 2) the path to injury or death for others.

Problem is, you don’t know until you play Injection Roulette how it will turn out for oneself.

So it comes down to what kind of personal resources the individual has to fall back on in case of incapacity due to the vaxx, or what kind of preparations or readiness the individual may have accomplished in case of sudden death from a vaxx.

Mandates are not science. Vaxx mandates are tyranny.

[Owen]

I have not done the numbers on this. But 1/3 in ten years may not be absurd and may have nothing at all to do with vaccines causing death.

Rather, the very high % of very old folks who are vaccinated could define 1/3 of the 10 yr deaths.

Again, haven’t done the numbers, but it could happen without any bizarre stuff the guy is implying.

[DoodleBob]

The shot may be 1) the best solution for many individuals, or it may be 2) the path to injury or death for others.

Problem is, you don’t know until you play Injection Roulette how it will turn out for oneself.

Vaxx mandates are tyranny.

[RandFan]

Thanks for the post Doodle

I think Jim’s position is correct.

Seemed to have missed his post on this so thanks for posting it.

He recognizes the argument for and against. Kudos.

We’re allowed to freely express ourselves here which is why I donate every quarter now to keep the lights on.

Feels totally different to the Dubya situation back in the day (I was a lurker *cough* ... )

Hope you have a good weekend.

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

Thanks for the reply. Lesser thing first. The HP links were amusing. Some of the back-and-forth about reverse Polish especially. I still think in RPN. Go figure.

As to the mRNA injections, you rightly see they are “still under EUA and the declining Efficacy [ which ] show the importance of long trials.” For those who wish to voluntarily participate, I have no problem for the choice theirs, but it is and remains an experiment. To mandate participation in an experiment is unconscionable, and in that I think we also agree.

[9YearLurker]

Also likely difficult to file a claim without a death certificate.

[DoodleBob]

Not that you'd WANT to do so, but you can see my long (rambling?) post on Efficacy that demonstrates how much we are indeed in agreement.

Parenthetically, I have an ACTUAL HP 12c app - not a cheapo knock-off version. When I whip that out in meetings, other HP freaks come out of the shadows. It's a full-on party when I bring out my actual 12c. We're a cult.