Or The Crash Test Dummies, "Mmmmm Mmmmm Mmmmmm"
Posted on 12/28/2021 9:54:21 AM PST by Red Badger
Brighton, N.Y. (WHAM) - It's arguably one of the most popular holiday songs in the world, however, it will no longer be sung at Council Rock Elementary in Brighton.
First reported by the online publication, the Rochester Beacon, the school has decided to remove 'Jingle Bells' from it's repertoire due to the song's 'questionable past'.
The Rochester Beacon says principal Matt Tappon confirmed the song, and several others, have been replaced with different songs that don't have the "potential to be controversial or offensive."
The article says a factor in the decision was research published in 2017 by Boston University professor Kyna Hamill.
In her research, the song's first public performance may have occurred in a minstrel show nearly 150 years ago, where white actors performed in blackface.
The district assistant superintendent for Brighton also told the Rochester Beacon that some suggest the use of collars on slaves with bells may be connected to the origin of the song and that even though they are not taking a stance of whether or not that is true, that line of thinking is not in agreement with "district beliefs."
Some people in the community believe banning the song altogether goes too far.
"You hear Jingle Bells and it's just the spirit of Christmas time," says Mary Santiago from Rochester. "Christmas without Jingle Bells isn't Christmas. I feel it's ridiculous," she said.
Ruth Ferguson, whose children were once students at Brighton, believes other schools should follow the same lead.
"It is taking away a Christmas tradition. That's a tradition, like so many traditions, that we need to lose if it's tied to slavery or racism. It's just that simple," Ferguson said.
While speaking with the Rochester Beacon, Hamill says she was surprised a school would ban the song and told the publication she believes it should still be sung and enjoyed by children.
13 WHAM reached out to the Brighton Central School District and Hamill for comment for this story.
On Tuesday, Superintendent Kevin McGowan responded:
Several weeks ago, a resident of the community asked for more information regarding an item that he had noticed on the District’s website regarding work being done to review curriculum with a diversity/equity lens. Specifically, he was curious about the District’s decision to use different songs in the elementary music curriculum based on work being done to be more culturally responsive. Several staff members provided feedback, explaining various reasons why the song “Jingle Bells” was no longer being used. This resident decided to write a piece on the subject and it was published last week by the Rochester Beacon. This article has been distributed by the author and picked up by a variety of media outlets.
First, we couldn’t be more proud of our staff and the work they continue to do to reflect on what they teach and how they teach in an ongoing effort to be more culturally responsive, thoughtful, and inclusive. Let me be very clear, their work has been and continues to be smart, thoughtful, and well intentioned in every way. We stand behind their work without hesitation or question. They are doing work that they have been asked to do and they are doing it exceptionally well K-12 in every discipline.
Second, it may seem silly to some, but the fact that “Jingle Bells” was first performed in minstrel shows where white actors performed in blackface does actually matter when it comes to questions of what we use as material in school. I’m glad that our staff paused when learning of this, reflected, and decided to use different material to accomplish the same objective in class. It is also important to note that a song so closely related to a religious holiday that is not celebrated by everyone in our community was not likely a song that we would have wanted as part of the school curriculum in the first place. Our staff found that their simple objective could be accomplished by singing any one of many songs in class and therefore they chose to simply choose other songs.
Third, choosing songs other than “Jingle Bells” wasn’t a major policy initiative, a “banning” of the song or some significant change to a concert repertoire done in response to a complaint. This wasn’t “liberalism gone amok” or “cancel culture at its finest” as some have suggested. Nobody has said you shouldn’t sing “Jingle Bells” or ever in any way suggested that to your children. I can assure you that this situation is not an attempt to push an agenda. We were not and are not even discussing the song and its origins, whatever they may be. This was very simply a thoughtful shift made by thoughtful staff members who thought they could accomplish their instructional objective using different material. The change in material is also not something being forced on children or propaganda being spread. The teachers have never taught about the song in any way when it was being used then or in the midst of deciding not to use it.
In other words, suggestions that this situation is somehow being used as a way to indoctrinate children just doesn’t make sense either. It is as simple as this, we are using different songs, and we are not teaching about their history at this level. Nobody is discussing politics about the song or anything regarding its history with students. This is not a political situation, it was a simple, thoughtful curricular decision.
Finally, if there is ever a question as to whether or not something might be experienced differently by someone else, shouldn’t we be respectful of that? Is singing the song "Jingle Bells" so important that it outweighs the question about its past or its potential to not be inclusive in a variety of ways. If many, many songs are available to accomplish the same objective, then why wouldn’t we use those songs? I think our teachers answered that question very thoughtfully and I’m proud of their work.
Modern liberals are behaving like judges in the Spanish Inquisition. If no real witches are available to be burned, find some innocent folks to burn. Gotta keep the bonfires going.
These people are kooky liberals looking for something to complain about, nothing more. These jerks really drive me batty with their nonsense.
LOL
Our School District banned Snow Men & Candy Canes for being insensitive
I say it regularly:
You will never meet anyone as narrow-minded, reactionary and as stupid as an “academic.”
Liberalism is a mental disease.
Can’t we just change the words to make it more inclusive?
Kwanzaa Bells, Kwanzaa Bells...
Right on. That’s just one of their great songs.
HAHAHAHA!!! That made me laugh. Thanks, Tom!
Jingle bells lyrics include ‘Dashing through the snow, in a one-horse open sleigh
Over the fields we go, laughing all the way
Bells on bob-tail ring, making spirits bright
What fun it is to ride and sing a sleighing song tonight’
It is a song about snow and a sleigh and the bells on the sleigh.
It was written by James Lord Pierpont and published under the title “The One Horse Open Sleigh” in the autumn of 1857.
There were no slaves in New York after 1799. It was a free state. So 150 years ago in NY there were no slaves and it was written about sleighing, and the sleighs had bells.
Does no one do research before knocking off things?
How absolutly asinine. You cannot erase everything you don’t like. What simple minded ignorance these people have.
Reminds me of the good looking young woman I once knew who wore a tee shirt which stated, “Yes I do, but not with you.”
(Yes, he was a real man.)
If Jingle bells is controversial, there is nothing which does not have the potential to be controversial or offensive.
They didn't finish that sentence. It should, if Leftists could ever speak one word of truth, say, "controversial or offensive to Leftists."
Lefties care not a whit about anything Conservatives find offensive or controversial...
Frosty the Snowman is controversial because snow is white...............
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.