So racist! Cancelled.
What else them white devils got?
Posted on 12/28/2021 9:54:21 AM PST by Red Badger
Brighton, N.Y. (WHAM) - It's arguably one of the most popular holiday songs in the world, however, it will no longer be sung at Council Rock Elementary in Brighton.
First reported by the online publication, the Rochester Beacon, the school has decided to remove 'Jingle Bells' from it's repertoire due to the song's 'questionable past'.
The Rochester Beacon says principal Matt Tappon confirmed the song, and several others, have been replaced with different songs that don't have the "potential to be controversial or offensive."
The article says a factor in the decision was research published in 2017 by Boston University professor Kyna Hamill.
In her research, the song's first public performance may have occurred in a minstrel show nearly 150 years ago, where white actors performed in blackface.
The district assistant superintendent for Brighton also told the Rochester Beacon that some suggest the use of collars on slaves with bells may be connected to the origin of the song and that even though they are not taking a stance of whether or not that is true, that line of thinking is not in agreement with "district beliefs."
Some people in the community believe banning the song altogether goes too far.
"You hear Jingle Bells and it's just the spirit of Christmas time," says Mary Santiago from Rochester. "Christmas without Jingle Bells isn't Christmas. I feel it's ridiculous," she said.
Ruth Ferguson, whose children were once students at Brighton, believes other schools should follow the same lead.
"It is taking away a Christmas tradition. That's a tradition, like so many traditions, that we need to lose if it's tied to slavery or racism. It's just that simple," Ferguson said.
While speaking with the Rochester Beacon, Hamill says she was surprised a school would ban the song and told the publication she believes it should still be sung and enjoyed by children.
13 WHAM reached out to the Brighton Central School District and Hamill for comment for this story.
On Tuesday, Superintendent Kevin McGowan responded:
Several weeks ago, a resident of the community asked for more information regarding an item that he had noticed on the District’s website regarding work being done to review curriculum with a diversity/equity lens. Specifically, he was curious about the District’s decision to use different songs in the elementary music curriculum based on work being done to be more culturally responsive. Several staff members provided feedback, explaining various reasons why the song “Jingle Bells” was no longer being used. This resident decided to write a piece on the subject and it was published last week by the Rochester Beacon. This article has been distributed by the author and picked up by a variety of media outlets.
First, we couldn’t be more proud of our staff and the work they continue to do to reflect on what they teach and how they teach in an ongoing effort to be more culturally responsive, thoughtful, and inclusive. Let me be very clear, their work has been and continues to be smart, thoughtful, and well intentioned in every way. We stand behind their work without hesitation or question. They are doing work that they have been asked to do and they are doing it exceptionally well K-12 in every discipline.
Second, it may seem silly to some, but the fact that “Jingle Bells” was first performed in minstrel shows where white actors performed in blackface does actually matter when it comes to questions of what we use as material in school. I’m glad that our staff paused when learning of this, reflected, and decided to use different material to accomplish the same objective in class. It is also important to note that a song so closely related to a religious holiday that is not celebrated by everyone in our community was not likely a song that we would have wanted as part of the school curriculum in the first place. Our staff found that their simple objective could be accomplished by singing any one of many songs in class and therefore they chose to simply choose other songs.
Third, choosing songs other than “Jingle Bells” wasn’t a major policy initiative, a “banning” of the song or some significant change to a concert repertoire done in response to a complaint. This wasn’t “liberalism gone amok” or “cancel culture at its finest” as some have suggested. Nobody has said you shouldn’t sing “Jingle Bells” or ever in any way suggested that to your children. I can assure you that this situation is not an attempt to push an agenda. We were not and are not even discussing the song and its origins, whatever they may be. This was very simply a thoughtful shift made by thoughtful staff members who thought they could accomplish their instructional objective using different material. The change in material is also not something being forced on children or propaganda being spread. The teachers have never taught about the song in any way when it was being used then or in the midst of deciding not to use it.
In other words, suggestions that this situation is somehow being used as a way to indoctrinate children just doesn’t make sense either. It is as simple as this, we are using different songs, and we are not teaching about their history at this level. Nobody is discussing politics about the song or anything regarding its history with students. This is not a political situation, it was a simple, thoughtful curricular decision.
Finally, if there is ever a question as to whether or not something might be experienced differently by someone else, shouldn’t we be respectful of that? Is singing the song "Jingle Bells" so important that it outweighs the question about its past or its potential to not be inclusive in a variety of ways. If many, many songs are available to accomplish the same objective, then why wouldn’t we use those songs? I think our teachers answered that question very thoughtfully and I’m proud of their work.
So racist! Cancelled.
What else them white devils got?
When Trump is re-elected, his FIRST act should be to RESURRECT/REDISPLAY every statue the Marxists took down.
Yes.
And, since I speak every language, allow me to interpret....
"Imperialist Yanqi running dogs so stupit".
Stephen Foster is rapidly becoming an ‘unperson’ in the music world. The Kentucky Derby has used “My Old Kentucky Home” as a theme song but ‘modified’ it playing with a ‘moment of thoughtful silence’.
While not Foster, when Maryland dropped “Maryland, My Maryland” as the state song, so did the Preakness (Baltimore) as it was also deemed racist!
There you go.
There was a black band called The Carolina Chocolate Drops who played old-style stringband music, along with some pieces from Foster and some that had roots in minstrel shows. I wonder what they would think about this.
Brighton elementary school bans ‘Jingle Bells’ due to song’s ‘questionable past’
I DON’T CARE. We will sing Jingle Bells, play Jingle Bells and enjoy Jingle Bells in spite of it’s ‘questionable past’.
lefturd loons are the most miserable unhappy people on earth so they have to make everyone else as miserable and unhappy as they are
“Is like Gorky says in ‘Lower Depths’...Quote...Miserable being must find more miserable being, then he’s happy...Unquote.”
Mental Illness - that is the only explanation for crap like this. It won’t stop until we get involved in every school board in the country. The school boards are getting to be like the FRBI - we cannot trust either one.
“Liberalism is a mental disease.” - Michael Savage..........................
It is about dismantling our culture, period. Everyone knows and loves this silly sleighing song, therefore it must go.
The article’s suggestion that the song is connected to a religious holiday is ridiculous. There is nothing religious about Jingle Bells. We just happen to pull it out at Christmas time.
lol
I hung a candy cane on my door, upside down, looked like a “J”.
“E-Mail no longer workie. I think he is in hiding.”
I expect he’s been called out on every point he attempted to make in his word salad denial memo. He knows he has become the puppet of his super-woke staff who have left him out to dry on the flimsiest basis possible, the “may have been used in a minstrel show” that had no evidence cited. A competent board would pull all the likely suspects in for an executive session to figure out who was hitting the bricks for such sloppy decision-making and slipshod academic process. Depending on how that how works out, the voters could then decide if a house-cleaning of the board is in order.
ACADEMIC (ak-uh-DEM-ik): An individual educated beyond his intelligence who is unwilling or unable to create or provide anything of value to others, who while hiding out in a think-tank, college or university pontificates and expects to be paid for it, usually from public funds.
Let’s Go Brighton.
I don’t know about that. I once saw a documentary about the Spanish Inquisition and there weren’t any lawyers.
thinking is not in agreement with “district beliefs.”
Without a doubt. And this guy’s long justification? All BS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.