Source – Page 15
Posted on 12/17/2021 10:54:56 AM PST by ransomnote
Since the first Covid-19 vaccine was authorised for use in the United Kingdom, and administered on the 8th December 2020, there have been hundreds of thousands of adverse reactions reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. But there is one particular adverse reaction which is both concerning and strange, and the number of people suffering from it is increasing by the week – Blindness.
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme analysis print for the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA jab shows that since the first jab was administered on the 9th December 2020, and up to December 8th 2021, 132 people have reported suffering blindness due to the injection. Another 6 people have also reported central vision loss, whilst a further 3 people have reported sudden visual loss.
Fifteen people have also reported an adverse reaction known as ‘blindness transient’ due to the Pfizer vaccine. This is where a person suffers visual disturbance or loss of sight in one eye for seconds or minutes at a time. And a further six people have reported an adverse reaction known as ‘unilateral blindness’. This is where a person is blind or has extremely poor vision in one eye.
In total there have been 6,682 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab as of 8th Dec 21.
The AstraZeneca viral vector injection has also caused hundreds of people to go blind. As of December 8th the MHRA has received 306 reports of blindness, 3 reports of central vision loss, 5 reports of sudden visual loss, and 26 reports of blindness transient among 14,448 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the jab.
The Moderna mRNA injection, which was first administered in June and has the lowest number of injections administered in the UK, has also caused several people to suffer blindness.
As of 8th Dec 21 the MHRA have received 19 reports of blindness, and 34 reports of visual impairment as adverse reactions to the Moderna injection.
In all, when including adverse reactions reported where the brand of vaccine was not specified, there have been 22,060 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections, with 461 of these reactions being complete blindness. Now, “fact-checkers” alongside authorities have been on the case to sweep this data under the carpet and have labelled it as unreliable. Their reasoning is that “just because someone reports the event after having the vaccine, it doesn’t necessarily mean it is due to the vaccine”.
But what they’re not telling you is that it also doesn’t necessarily mean it is not due to the vaccine, and we imagine every single person who has reported an adverse reaction would disagree with the fact checkers and authorities attempts to play down these reports.
For instance one person who goes by the name of Louis has been documenting the story of his wife on Twitter since she had the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine.
Unfortunately his wife went completely blind in her left eye and 30-60% blind in her right eye after having the AstraZeneca jab and the neurologist treating her, categorically told her not have the second dose.
As you can see the misery which the fact checkers are disregarding as “not necessarily the fault of the vaccine” is very real for the people who are reporting them. But why are the Covid vaccines causing people to go blind?
Well there is another extremely concerning adverse reaction that has been reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme, one which has seen an astronomical increase in the number of reports in the past few weeks – stroke.
As of 8th Dec 21, the MHRA has received 652 reports of stroke due to the Pfizer mRNA injection, which is now the primary booster jab being administered to Brits. These reports include 14 reports of subarachnoid haemorrhage, which is an extremely rare type of stroke, 48 reports of cerebral haemorrhage, 55 reports of ischaemic stroke, and 414 reports of cerebrovascular accidents.
Sadly these 652 reported strokes have resulted in 47 deaths.
Unfortunately the AstraZeneca vaccine has also caused hundred of strokes. Up to 8th Dec 21 the MHRA has received 2,193 reports of stroke as adverse reactions to the jab resulting in 154 deaths. The 2,193 strokes include 180 cerebral haemorrhages, 114 subarachnoid haemorrhages (supposed to be rare), 156 ischaemic strokes, and a shocking 1,275 cerebrovascular accidents.
But what does this have to do with people going blind? Well this helpful fact sheet provided by the Stroke Foundation in Australia provides the answer as to why. According to the fact sheet around one-third of stroke survivors suffer visual loss, and most sadly never fully recover their vision.
The reason strokes cause blindness is that vision depends on a healthy eye to receive information and a healthy brain to process that information. The nerves in the eye travel from the eye through the brain to the occipital cortex at the back of the brain, allowing you to see.
Most strokes affect one side of the brain. Nerves from each eye travel together in the brain, so both eyes are affected. If the right side of your brain is damaged, the left side vision in each eye may be affected. It is rare for both sides of the brain to be affected by stroke. When it does happen, it can result in blindness.
So if you’ve been wondering how on earth the experimental Covid vaccines could cause a person to go blind, you now know why. It’s the vast amount of strokes the Covid injections are causing that is contributing to this devastating and life-changing adverse event. Strokes will not be the only contributing factor of course, but the numbers suggest they are most likely the main adverse reaction at fault.
With a national campaign to administer a third jab to millions of Brits within the space of a few weeks we dread to think how many more people will have to suffer the life debilitating condition of blindness due to an experimental injection that does not work and makes the recipient worse according to the UK Governments own data.
It isn't simply a matter of trust, and it isn't just the CDC.
There are thousands of CDC and FDA employees and clinicians looking at this data and tens of thousands of healthcare professionals across the country monitoring and reporting these events.
If the administrators lied to cover up a lot of actual vaccine deaths there would be hundreds of people blowing the whistle.
The alternative is a massive conspiracy involving thousands, and as I've said before I don't believe those exist.
After the election I was just sick when I realized that Biden was going to keep Fauci as a major Covid spokesdoctor.
Many countries have de facto control groups because they simply don’t have enough vaccine to give to everyone. This has in effect actually been done in India regarding Ivermectin where some states like Uttar Pradesh have actively promoted an Ivermectin protocol (I wish I knew what else they included when their health workers distributed it in many thousnds of villages). On the other hand, other Indian states actively prevented using Ivermectin if what I read is correct and had much worse Covid statistics.
Now, “fact-checkers” alongside authorities have been on the case to sweep this data under the carpet and have labelled it as unreliable. Their reasoning is that “just because someone reports the event after having the vaccine, it doesn’t necessarily mean it is due to the vaccine”.
But what they’re not telling you is that it also doesn’t necessarily mean it is not due to the vaccine, and we imagine every single person who has reported an adverse reaction would disagree with the fact checkers and authorities attempts to play down these reports.
Look, they're talking about YOU, banned liberal troll formerly known as Mojo.
#MojoTheFactChecker
Thank you for looking those figures up. And the 60,000 is the lower amo unt of people reporting blindness on VAERS, but going with that, it’s an 87.5% increase.
That’s not even close enough to say it’s within the margin of error.
Going with the larger number it’s an 181% increase.
I have enough trouble with my eyes. No thank you to any vaccines. They also increase inflammation, and that would add to my eye problems.
We would never know, the mainstream media is censoring the news. But still, there are quite a few leaks by physicians saying they are being threatened. And nurses. I don’t know what number you need for it to pass the threshold of whether it’s believable or not, but it’s enough for me right now.
Very interesting, thanks for that. I guess we’ll hear those comparison numbers eventually, or not, depending if we keep having propaganda and censoring.
As for what they are given you could look at the front line docks pages. It may not match but it is their recommendation.
I believe the only reason they vaccinated their control group is to erase the control. They are fully weaponized and unaccountable to the public. THere’s a reason there are 70 CCP members on Pfizers ‘Investments Board’.
We don’t have any evidence that there’s a higher rate of blindness in the vaccinate
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
False. We have evidence that blindness is associated with Covid vaccines at a far higher rate than any other vaccine, including the annual flu vaccine. There’s no reason for deaths, strokes, heart failure, blood clots, neurological damage and other injuries, like blindness, to cluster around Covid ‘vaccine’s at drastically greater levels than all other vaccines, often linking onset closely in time to injection (e.g., within 2 days). You keep deflecting from the obvious truth.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine?, gleeaikin wrote: |
Many countries have de facto control groups because they simply don’t have enough vaccine to give to everyone. This has in effect actually been done in India regarding Ivermectin where some states like Uttar Pradesh have actively promoted an Ivermectin protocol (I wish I knew what else they included when their health workers distributed it in many thousnds of villages). On the other hand, other Indian states actively prevented using Ivermectin if what I read is correct and had much worse Covid statistics. |
That's ridiculous. De facto control groups are irrelevant as they are not monitored or part of any study. Pfizer's Covid 'vaccine' trials had 1200 deaths within the first few months and that figure was going to keep increasining exponential; having a control group would expose the depths of evil in play behind forced toxic vaccinations.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine?, gleeaikin wrote: |
Many countries have de facto control groups because they simply don’t have enough vaccine to give to everyone. This has in effect actually been done in India regarding Ivermectin where some states like Uttar Pradesh have actively promoted an Ivermectin protocol (I wish I knew what else they included when their health workers distributed it in many thousnds of villages). On the other hand, other Indian states actively prevented using Ivermectin if what I read is correct and had much worse Covid statistics. |
That's ridiculous. De facto control groups are irrelevant as they are not monitored or part of any study. Pfizer's Covid 'vaccine' trials had 1200 deaths within the first few months and that figure was going to keep increasining exponential; having a control group would expose the depths of evil in play behind forced toxic vaccinations.
I think the weaponized Pfizer contracts which demand secrecy and that China’s Pfizer ‘face’ controls all aspects/information/distribution of the Covid ‘vaccine’ includes letting Pfizer/China state and determine who represents the vaccine program in the US. So China is holding up Biden as a puppet and directing the conduct of biowarfare through our own medical agencies (i.e. Fauci).
I concur.
And that’s why they are panicking, because there are enough of us left that when the vaccinated start dropping like flies, the difference in occurrences and death rates from different diseases will be obvious.
Even if true that says nothing about blindness in the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated.
There’s no reason for deaths, strokes, heart failure, blood clots, neurological damage and other injuries, like blindness, to cluster around Covid ‘vaccine’s at drastically greater levels than all other vaccines...
And we don't know that they do.
What we know is there have been many more events reported to VAERS related to Covid vaccines than for any other vaccine.
But we've never had a situation like this of mass vaccination of hundreds of millions of people since the VAERS system was created.
Given that the vaccines are new and there's been massive media coverage (an understatement) I'd fully expect people to be more likely to report any event that occurred after a shot.
For instance, I think someone who experienced blindness two weeks after a tetanus shot would be much less likely to report it to VAERS than they would be after a Covid shot.
Never mind that we've never gotten close to the numbers of people vaccinated in a short period of time.
That's why the test has to be vaccinated vs. unvaccinated, or at least what you would expect in an unvaccinated population.
VAERS is self reported or mandatory for healthcare providers even if there's no causal connection to the vaccines.
It's the definition of anecdotal.
I fully believe those events happened. What neither I nor you have is the evidence to show the level of serious adverse events exceeds what you would have without the vaccines.
semimojo: Even if true that says nothing about blindness in the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated.
IF true? YOu're just flat out denying reality so that CDC records available to the public in VAERS for review actually don't exist or are the product of conspiracy theories?
Your statement is false. Every year about 250+ million unvaccinated people have flu vaccines. Everyone was not vaccinated with the Covid 'vaccines' oustide of the PFizer trial through 2020. There's decades of unvaccinated data in VAERS to compare with the horrific toll the Covid gene therapy 'vaccines' are causing.
quoting ransomnote: There’s no reason for deaths, strokes, heart failure, blood clots, neurological damage and other injuries, like blindness, to cluster around Covid ‘vaccine’s at drastically greater levels than all other vaccines...
Semimojo: And we don't know that they do.
Yes we do. We absolutely are witnessing first hand side effects never seen before in any prior year. Deaths in the newspaper no longer state cause. Funeral home business and all cause mortality were flat until 2020. In 2021 business is booming in mortuaries and church funerals. Karl Denninger of Market Ticker is asking where 2 million working age adults 'went' because they dropped out of demographics without a trace - something he's never seen happen before.
So far, Steve Kirsch's team has identified 150,000 deaths as a result of the Covid 'vaccines' (45K unreported deaths in the Medicare database) and he is citing another team which claims to have 388,000 post Covid 'vaccine' deaths. The true number will continue to climb.
What we know is there have been many more events reported to VAERS related to Covid vaccines than for any other vaccine.
Amazing isn't it? Inspite of threats, gag orders, firings and removal of hospital privileges and an intentional neglect wherein doctors don't even know what VAERS is, and those who say they do also state it takes too long and is too hard to file a report - just as the CDC intended - there's STILL an unprecedented number of reports filed to VAERS.
I mean it's hard to imagine given the CDC has received more reports of post Covid adverse events than it is willing to publish. It's withholding data. Then, given a year to prepare their intentionally balky, awkward database that logs users out without warning so they have to start their reports over from the beginning, the CDC created a separate, private database that only they can access and made the app available to everyone who was vaccinated. How's that for sneaky? 30 years of centralized data collection until Covid - then it's pushing the public to use 'V-Safe' on their phones, to their reports are only available to the CDC.
But we've never had a situation like this of mass vaccination of hundreds of millions of people since the VAERS system was created.
You have to be joking. All school children are vaccinated. Annually flu vaccinations average 250+ million. The annual flu shot is the mass vaccination.
What's new and novel is the unprecedented levels of human rights abuses, Constitutional Rights violates, and Communist Regime tactics to force people to get a toxic 'vaccine' they don't need. The Nuremberg Code was supposed to prevent this from happening, but dictators on the world stage don't follow codes, laws, rights or decency.
Given that the vaccines are new and there's been massive media coverage (an understatement) I'd fully expect people to be more likely to report any event that occurred after a shot.
There's no staffing to spend 1 hour (because VAERS is designed to be slow and akward to deter reporting) filing a VAERS case. Those who do go out of their way to file are punished and threatened into silence. MEdical staff have gag orders. The 'Massive Media' coverage you cite is an unprecedented propaganda blitz serving the biowarfare effort. When asked if they're going to report to VAERS, some doctors ask, "What's VAERS?" Disinformation is real - as you know better than most.
For instance, I think someone who experienced blindness two weeks after a tetanus shot would be much less likely to report it to VAERS than they would be after a Covid shot.
HEre you are, carrying water for Fauci and others who want us dead. You're pretending that an unprecedented level of threats/harrassment and firing in addition to gag orders are not in play. You're pretending Google and other technolords are not censoring free speech.
Never mind that we've never gotten close to the numbers of people vaccinated in a short period of time.
Well that's just not true is it? Take annual school vaccinations and annual flu vaccinations and put 'em together. Compare with 1 year of Covid 'vaccinations'.
That's why the test has to be vaccinated vs. unvaccinated, or at least what you would expect in an unvaccinated population.
No. The test is unvaccinated in 2020 compared with vaccinated in 2021. Or the 30 years prior of no Covid vaccines compared with 2021.
VAERS is self reported or mandatory for healthcare providers even if there's no causal connection to the vaccines.
Self reported? So you're saying blind people use VAERs to type in their personal tragedy? Are those who died as a result of the Covid 'vaccine' self reporting?
As I said, the world is well aware the CCP administration is doing everything it can to suppress reporting of vaccine harm. I'm living in the real world, not your propaganda bubble, watching medical staff be fired or quit because of the abuses meant to keep the biowarfare a secret and lure as many victims into the Covid 'vaccine' program as possible.
VAERS is a safety signal meant to stop what's happening, not signal a need for more research that will never happen/never be funded/never be allowed to be published/never used if published.
It's the definition of anecdotal.
Incredible how low you'll go. Congress mandated the CDC to provide a system to function as a safety signal so that if a hazardous product were introduced, the safety signal would cause the halting of the program until all safety concerns were thoroughly addressed. Your kind implies the killing/maiming simply has to continue until those battling to get the truth past the censors somehow prevail against state-level attacks.
I fully believe those events happened. What neither I nor you have is the evidence to show the level of serious adverse events exceeds what you would have without the vaccines.
What an evil, malevolent fabrication. With 1200 deaths during the Pfizer trial, there was always rock solid evidence to show that Covid 'vaccines' were more deadly than anything else in VAERS.
By January, there were already unprecedented numbers of deaths in the 'vaccine rollout' and the CDC started throttling data releases. Instead of weekly data releases, they began backfilling so in late January, records from December were 'updated' - instead of continuing with current records.
The Safety Signal is functioning but the CDC has created a 'safety algorithm' which mathemeticians have proven is impossible to cross. The CDC metaphorically set the bar at infinity. Literally no number of deaths could cross the CDC's safety threshold
But you're right in there with Fauci/CDC, claiming there's no proof.
And don’t forget
plenty of self-claimed “doctors” here, or at least they play one anonymously on the internet,
were here doing their best to bash those doctors as well
As you well know I've never denied those reports. What I deny is these reports necessarily being associated with the Covid vaccines.
Accidental deaths following Covid vaccination have been reported to VAERS. Would you say those deaths are associated with the vaccines?
Every year about 250+ million unvaccinated people have flu vaccines.
Your numbers are too high but even so, you reinforce my point.
After 170 million doses of flu vaccine don't you think there were tens of thousands of adverse medical events among that population? They weren't reported to VAERS.
The difference is the flu vaccines are routine and long known to be safe so people don't associate bad events with the flu shot. Not the case with Covid.
In 2021 business is booming in mortuaries and church funerals.
Is it disproportionately the vaccinated who are dying, after correcting for demographics?
So far, Steve Kirsch's team has identified 150,000 deaths as a result of the Covid 'vaccines' (45K unreported deaths in the Medicare database)
45K deaths in the Medicare database attributed to Covid vaccines? Citation, please.
All school children are vaccinated.
Not every year. Most get vaccinated once for each disease, plus as I've said those same vaccines have been administered for generations. People are much less likely to associate events following a Tdap to the vaccine than events following a Covid vaccination. Partly because of the volume of misinformation that's been pushed out about the Covid vaccines.
What's new and novel is the unprecedented levels of human rights abuses, Constitutional Rights violates, and Communist Regime tactics to force people to get a toxic 'vaccine' they don't need.
OK, but that's politics. I'm talking about health data.
HEre you are, carrying water for Fauci and others who want us dead.
Right. They want us dead.
Drama Queen much?
Self reported? So you're saying blind people use VAERs to type in their personal tragedy?
I said self reported - which could include a loved one physically entering the data - or mandatory for healthcare providers. Don't misrepresent.
VAERS is a safety signal meant to stop what's happening...
Close. It's a safety signal meant to help identify significant risks from the vaccines and to your great consternation it hasn't as of yet.
At least not to the professionals who know what it represents and have the resources to investigate bad outcomes.
...the safety signal would cause the halting of the program until all safety concerns were thoroughly addressed.
And it will. Your problem is simply that you disagree with the public health professionals.
And frankly, given the dishonest nature of much of what you post I'd go with them over theexpose.uk, for instance.
With 1200 deaths during the Pfizer trial, there was always rock solid evidence to show that Covid 'vaccines' were more deadly than anything else in VAERS.
First of all, there were exactly 6 deaths in the Pfizer trial.
Second, clinical trials don't use VAERS.
The 1200 number you quote comes from collecting all adverse event reports from the first (almost) three months after the vaccine was rolled out.
Like all of these AE reports not all these deaths were attributed to the vaccine!. In fact, none of them were!
Old, sick people, who were the first to get the vaccine, die fairly frequently. I can't tell from the documents I saw how many doses were administered during that period but I'd expect it was millions. What makes you think 1200 reported deaths over 3 months is unusually high for that population?
The Safety Signal is functioning but the CDC has created a 'safety algorithm' which mathemeticians have proven is impossible to cross.
As I've said, I'm not a believer in large conspiracies.
“...there have been 6,682 eye disorders (blindness) reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab...” and
“reports are increasing by the week...”
I am not blind, but I am severely hard of hearing, and I am on medication to control my epileptic seizures. I refuse to take any Covid-19 vaccine because there is NO KNOWN evidence that any of these NEW Covid vaccines:
- will not affect my hearing ability, nor my seizures to get worse;
- has no toxic interactions between my seizure drugs Lamotrigine or Levetiracetam with these vaccines; and
- if these vaccines are safe. “In 1998, took an average of 7 years from the date of filing to determine if a vaccine is unsafe”*
I don’t have a problem if others opted to taking them. I just ain’t gonna be a guinea pig.
If my part time job at my food store requires a vaccine, I will regrettably quit.
I’m not even taking the flu vaccine this year. Isn’t it too early to tell if there are any reactions between flu shot and the Covid-19 drugs? Flu shots are about are only 50% effective (flip your coin). And I can’t help but worry if the new flu or the Covid-19 vaccines are deliberately designed to be lethal...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
