Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/04/2021 11:12:52 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cathi; Unrepentant VN Vet; metmom; Fractal Trader; SecAmndmt; bagster; doc maverick; ...

PING


2 posted on 12/04/2021 11:13:46 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

I am surprised that these negative effects are much more common in the younger age groups. I would expect them to be clustered in older age groups where there may already be some progression towards heart disease, even if minor or undiagnosed.


3 posted on 12/04/2021 11:25:29 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

4 posted on 12/04/2021 11:26:43 AM PST by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote; Travis McGee

BtTT.


8 posted on 12/04/2021 11:43:55 AM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: El Cid

Self ping


10 posted on 12/04/2021 12:17:21 PM PST by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

I’ve seen the media blaming vaccinated athletes heart attack deaths on drugs, blaming fake variants for myocarditis and also pandemic ptsd. All while pushing more clot shots and boosters. They are gaslighting all of us.


11 posted on 12/04/2021 12:19:56 PM PST by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Follow the magic.

I have mentioned Rupert Sheldrake in several posts before and linked to his most famous podcast—The Science Delusion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HybPD0VsFP0

The abuse of science is getting blatant and obvious, but Sheldrake has a much more subtle point—which is that the biases of scientists have real impact not just on how they analyze the data, but the actual data itself.

Such a concept is considered “anti science”, of course....

“Science” is caught in a loop where its conclusions are proven because it assumes them to begin with....and if you do not agree you are not a true scientist and are fired!


13 posted on 12/04/2021 12:29:03 PM PST by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Follow the magic.

I have mentioned Rupert Sheldrake in several posts before and linked to his most famous podcast—The Science Delusion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HybPD0VsFP0

The abuse of science is getting blatant and obvious, but Sheldrake has a much more subtle point—which is that the biases of scientists have real impact not just on how they analyze the data, but the actual data itself.

Such a concept is considered “anti science”, of course....

“Science” is caught in a loop where its conclusions are proven because it assumes them to begin with....and if you do not agree you are not a true scientist and are fired!


14 posted on 12/04/2021 12:29:04 PM PST by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote; Vermont Lt; BobL; Kartographer; JRandomFreeper; Tilted Irish Kilt; Jane Long; ...

So now, those two months or so of heart palpitations that seems to coincide with my second jab were actually PTSD, even though I had spent a year or so mostly in isolation prior, with none of these problems???

COOL!

Coronavirus PING!


19 posted on 12/04/2021 12:51:53 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Florida: America's new free zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
"rates per million doses"

Considering that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines require two doses (and now a booster) for maximum efficiency, it is also possible that the negative effects may also require two or more doses before they become apparent. So, the actual incidence of these heart effects - if based on a CUMULATIVE impact of the vaccines - may be much higher than the per-dose chart suggests.

For example, if 35 of 100,000 people report heart problems after being vaccinated, the percent is .035%. But if those 100,000 people had 220,000 doses, the percent per dose drops to .0159% - less than half of the per-person percentage. What's my point? That basing the statistics on doses rather than persons may understate the extent of the problem.
20 posted on 12/04/2021 1:00:16 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Why are they calling it “post-pandemic” stress disorder? Does that mean the pandemic is over?


23 posted on 12/04/2021 1:27:35 PM PST by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

It’s not stress.

It’s the jab.


26 posted on 12/04/2021 2:48:38 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
This means that they can wave away little Jack's enlarged heart by saying that he was just stressed out over asking little Jill out on a date.

-PJ

27 posted on 12/04/2021 2:50:36 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson