i see we have now reached the "cover up" stage of the vaccination campaign | did someone leave the gaslight on?

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/i-see-we-have-now-reached-the-cover ^ | el gato malo

[ransomnote]

[H/T Travis McGee]

ransomnote: I enjoyed this article, even with the author's lack of capitalization.

there is a point where even loquacious internet cats start running out of snark.

THIS is just staggering in its predatory mendacity.

 

there is not a shred of evidence to support it nor any remotely plausible reason to even put forward such a hypothesis.

frankly, it’s patently absurd and has no precedent in other stressful events. being bombed nightly during the blitz did not cause this.

this is a desperate lie from a desperate class of state run doctors desperate to shift the blame for that which they have wrought.

nothing more.

is there literally anyone who wants to take the other side of the “this trend of “PTSD” is going to be nearly totally limited to those who received one or more dose of covid vaccine” bet?

because i’m making book.

 

you can tell a lot about what people are afraid of when they start answering questions that were not really asked.

it goes double when the answers don’t make any sense.

there is no question that lockdowns, social alienation and ostracization, etc have cased piles of mental health problems. this is what makes it a great smokescreen. but there is no way that’s translating to heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and myo and pericarditis in young people like this. it doesn’t do that (or at least not to any meaningful extent).

what DOES do that are these vaccines. and it concentrates MOST in the young and, seemingly, in athletes.

MORE AT LINK

[ransomnote]

PING

[Steve_Seattle]

I am surprised that these negative effects are much more common in the younger age groups. I would expect them to be clustered in older age groups where there may already be some progression towards heart disease, even if minor or undiagnosed.

[EasySt]

[.44 Special]

And that is a fact, Jack.

[JennysCool]

Great graphic. All we would need to combat everything in it is a President who is not afraid to straight-talk the corrupt, and take action that turns the tables and destroys them.

Oh, we had one of those Presidents. And they cheated him out of office.

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

Great meme....stolen!

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

BtTT.

[EasySt]

[El Cid]

Self ping

[Trillian]

I’ve seen the media blaming vaccinated athletes heart attack deaths on drugs, blaming fake variants for myocarditis and also pandemic ptsd. All while pushing more clot shots and boosters. They are gaslighting all of us.

[seowulf]

I am surprised that these negative effects are much more common in the younger age groups.

Could be related to immune response which is generally higher in children and young adults.

It's why some flu strains are more deadly in the young causing cytokine storms.

[cgbg]

Follow the magic.

I have mentioned Rupert Sheldrake in several posts before and linked to his most famous podcast—The Science Delusion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HybPD0VsFP0

The abuse of science is getting blatant and obvious, but Sheldrake has a much more subtle point—which is that the biases of scientists have real impact not just on how they analyze the data, but the actual data itself.

Such a concept is considered “anti science”, of course....

“Science” is caught in a loop where its conclusions are proven because it assumes them to begin with....and if you do not agree you are not a true scientist and are fired!

[cgbg]

Follow the magic.

I have mentioned Rupert Sheldrake in several posts before and linked to his most famous podcast—The Science Delusion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HybPD0VsFP0

The abuse of science is getting blatant and obvious, but Sheldrake has a much more subtle point—which is that the biases of scientists have real impact not just on how they analyze the data, but the actual data itself.

Such a concept is considered “anti science”, of course....

“Science” is caught in a loop where its conclusions are proven because it assumes them to begin with....and if you do not agree you are not a true scientist and are fired!

[miserare]

That’s not science. It’s tyranny!

[Steve_Seattle]

Thanks.

[cgbg]

Rupert’s argument (which is both hilarious and sad) is that scientists in training spend many years conducting the experiments in their field to prove they have mastered the “laws of science” by producing the expected lab results.

If they fail to do so they are not allowed to be official scientists.

In other words, they either learn to be good liars or know how to do magic!

[cgbg]

Rupert’s argument (which is both hilarious and sad) is that scientists in training spend many years conducting the experiments in their field to prove they have mastered the “laws of science” by producing the expected lab results.

If they fail to do so they are not allowed to be official scientists.

In other words, they either learn to be good liars or know how to do magic!

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

So now, those two months or so of heart palpitations that seems to coincide with my second jab were actually PTSD, even though I had spent a year or so mostly in isolation prior, with none of these problems???

COOL!

Coronavirus PING!

[Steve_Seattle]

"rates per million doses"

Considering that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines require two doses (and now a booster) for maximum efficiency, it is also possible that the negative effects may also require two or more doses before they become apparent. So, the actual incidence of these heart effects - if based on a CUMULATIVE impact of the vaccines - may be much higher than the per-dose chart suggests.

For example, if 35 of 100,000 people report heart problems after being vaccinated, the percent is .035%. But if those 100,000 people had 220,000 doses, the percent per dose drops to .0159% - less than half of the per-person percentage. What's my point? That basing the statistics on doses rather than persons may understate the extent of the problem.