Posted on 12/04/2021 11:12:52 AM PST by ransomnote
PING
I am surprised that these negative effects are much more common in the younger age groups. I would expect them to be clustered in older age groups where there may already be some progression towards heart disease, even if minor or undiagnosed.
And that is a fact, Jack.
Great graphic. All we would need to combat everything in it is a President who is not afraid to straight-talk the corrupt, and take action that turns the tables and destroys them.
Oh, we had one of those Presidents. And they cheated him out of office.
Great meme....stolen!
BtTT.
Self ping
I’ve seen the media blaming vaccinated athletes heart attack deaths on drugs, blaming fake variants for myocarditis and also pandemic ptsd. All while pushing more clot shots and boosters. They are gaslighting all of us.
Could be related to immune response which is generally higher in children and young adults.
It's why some flu strains are more deadly in the young causing cytokine storms.
Follow the magic.
I have mentioned Rupert Sheldrake in several posts before and linked to his most famous podcast—The Science Delusion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HybPD0VsFP0
The abuse of science is getting blatant and obvious, but Sheldrake has a much more subtle point—which is that the biases of scientists have real impact not just on how they analyze the data, but the actual data itself.
Such a concept is considered “anti science”, of course....
“Science” is caught in a loop where its conclusions are proven because it assumes them to begin with....and if you do not agree you are not a true scientist and are fired!
Follow the magic.
I have mentioned Rupert Sheldrake in several posts before and linked to his most famous podcast—The Science Delusion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HybPD0VsFP0
The abuse of science is getting blatant and obvious, but Sheldrake has a much more subtle point—which is that the biases of scientists have real impact not just on how they analyze the data, but the actual data itself.
Such a concept is considered “anti science”, of course....
“Science” is caught in a loop where its conclusions are proven because it assumes them to begin with....and if you do not agree you are not a true scientist and are fired!
That’s not science. It’s tyranny!
Thanks.
Rupert’s argument (which is both hilarious and sad) is that scientists in training spend many years conducting the experiments in their field to prove they have mastered the “laws of science” by producing the expected lab results.
If they fail to do so they are not allowed to be official scientists.
In other words, they either learn to be good liars or know how to do magic!
Rupert’s argument (which is both hilarious and sad) is that scientists in training spend many years conducting the experiments in their field to prove they have mastered the “laws of science” by producing the expected lab results.
If they fail to do so they are not allowed to be official scientists.
In other words, they either learn to be good liars or know how to do magic!
So now, those two months or so of heart palpitations that seems to coincide with my second jab were actually PTSD, even though I had spent a year or so mostly in isolation prior, with none of these problems???
COOL!
Coronavirus PING!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.