Posted on 12/01/2021 9:25:14 AM PST by weston
The DOJ and Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers have made a deal that her “little black book” of contacts will never be made public https://t.co/ydzLFkrtlm— Jack Posobiec ✝️ (@JackPosobiec) December 30, 2021
Looks like Dinesh was right, about Slick Willie’s post *trial* celebration.
All for cover....for these vile and nasty elites....who should be locked up, for life.
😡
No, not at all.
The evil logic is they don’t want to get sued by people they are harming and the families that have lost loved ones to death by VAX.
You are right on there is NO science.
That is adorable!
Hugs right back! 💞
....
I found this from 2017:
http://sonorannews.com/2017/07/03/vaccine-manufacturers-exempt-liability/
Why vaccine manufacturers are exempt from liability
By Linda Bentley -July 3, 2017
WASHINGTON – In 1986 Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), creating a no-fault compensation program to stabilize a vaccine market adversely affected by an increase in vaccine-related lawsuits and to facilitate compensation to claimants who found pursuing legitimate vaccine-inflicted injuries too difficult and cost prohibitive.
The NCVIA allowed for a party alleging a vaccine-related injury to file a petition for compensation in the Court of Federal Claims, naming the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary as the respondent.
The court was required to resolve the case by a specified deadline and then the claimant could decide whether to accept the court’s judgment or reject it and seek tort relief from the vaccine manufacturer.
Awards were paid out from a fund created by an excise tax on each vaccine dose.
However, the NCVIA also provided vaccine manufacturers with significant tort-liability protections and eliminated manufacturer liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable adverse side effects.
Under 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22 – Standards of responsibility: Paragraph (b), which addresses “Unavoidable adverse side effects; warnings” states, “(1) No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.
“(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), a vaccine shall be presumed to be accompanied by proper directions and warnings if the vaccine manufacturer shows that it complied in all material respects with all requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act …” unless the plaintiff is able to show the manufacturer engaged in specific conduct or failed to exercise due care by clear and convincing evidence in its compliance with the Act.
Section (c) Direct warnings, states, “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, solely due to the manufacturer’s failure to provide direct warnings to the injured party (or the injured party’s legal representative) of the potential dangers resulting from the administration of the vaccine manufactured by the manufacturer.”
Section (e) prohibits states from establishing or enforcing a law that would bar an individual from bringing civil action against a vaccine manufacturer for damages for a vaccine-related injury or death if such civil action is not barred by the NCVIA.
The U.S. Supreme Court granted review in the case of Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth LLC with Justice Antonin Scalia delivering the opinion of the court on Feb. 22, 2011.
The court held, “The NCVIA preempts all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs seeking compensation for injury or death caused by the vaccine’s side effects.”
Scalia opened by stating, “For the last 66 years, vaccines have been subject to the same federal premarket approval process as prescription drugs, and compensation for vaccine-related injuries has been left largely to the states. Under that regime, the elimination of communicable diseases through vaccination became ‘one of the greatest achievements’ of public health in the 20th century. But in the 1970s and 1980s vaccines became, one might say, victims of their own success. They had been so effective in preventing infectious diseases that the public became much less alarmed at the threat of those diseases and more concerned with the risk of injury from the vaccines themselves.”
He noted most of the concerns were centered on the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) vaccine, which was blamed for children’s disabilities and developmental delays and led to a massive increase in vaccine-related tort litigation.
Between 1978 and 1981 only nine product liability suits were filed against DTP manufacturers but by the mid-1980s lawsuits rose to over 200 per year.
The lawsuits destabilized the DTP vaccine market, causing two of the three manufacturers to withdraw, leaving only Lederle Laboratories, which estimated its tort liability exceeded its annual sales by a factor of 200.
Despite the large number of lawsuits, many still complained that obtaining compensation for legitimate vaccine-inflicted injuries was too costly and difficult.
A significant number of parents began declining vaccinations for their children while concerns about compensation further threatened to depress vaccination rates.
Public health officials became concerned and claimed vaccines were only effective in preventing outbreaks of disease if a large percentage of the population was vaccinated.
Congress enacted the NCVIA to stabilize the vaccine market and make it possible to provide fast, informal adjudication via the Act’s Vaccine Injury Table, which lists the vaccines covered under the Act; describes each vaccine’s compensable, adverse side effects; and indicates how soon after vaccination those side effects should first manifest themselves.
We can have the party over here and dance on my new floors! No stiletto heels please.
Gotta love MTG! I agree!
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene suggests a ‘national divorce’ between red and blue states
NY Post ^ | 29 Dec 2021 | Jesse O’Neill
Posted on 12/30/2021, 9:39:58 AM by DUMBGRUNT
Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene renewed calls for a “national divorce” between red and blue states, arguing that Americans who move to conservative states from California and New York should have a “cooling off” period before being allowed to vote.
...“All possible in a National Divorce scenario,” Greene wrote. “After Democrat voters and big donors ruin a state like California, you would think it wise to stop them from doing it to another great state like Florida. Brainwashed people that move from CA and NY really need a cooling off period.”
RE: NEW FLOORS...
We could have a SOCK HOP!
😂
Maybe so!!
Well, no, it did not go well. Through neither our fault, not Delta's fault, we were not allowed on our initial flight. We have, after about four or five hours of effort on the part of Terrance, and a young lady, we are now scheduled to leave around five this afternoon. Hopefully, the truly bad weather going through the ATL airport will be gone by then.
We are currently sitting in the Delta Sky Lounge re-hydrating and relaxing, watching the clouds go by. We'll arrive only three hours later than our originally scheduled time.
Ah, you must be flexible these days!
............
I remember back in the early 60's, my dad just put in a new linoleum floor and he made it known that he did not want my mom's sewing club to come over because many of them wore high heals on a regular basis and several were very heavy.
That sounds great!
I’ll wear socks....will that work?
We can have a sock hop 😂
JUST IN - Robert Koch Institute report released today states that 95.58% of the #Omicron cases in Germany are fully vaccinated (28% of those had a “booster”), 4.42% are unvaccinated.
71.1% of the total population is fully vaccinated in Germany.
https://twitter.com/Tim_Roehn/status/1476575806969335812
@disclosetv
🙃
I listened to War Room off and on, and I heard some discussion between Bannon and Posobiec about an hour long show explaining everything that’s going on....it sounded very worth while listening to. I think it’s tomorrow’s show, but not sure. Did you hear them, Gran?
Now, you're talking my language.
Have a happy flight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.