Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome dramatically increases after mRNA Covid Injections, a new Study finds

dailyexpose.uk ^ | NOVEMBER 22, 2021 | RHODA WILSON

[ransomnote]

PING

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Can’t acknowledge it until all the deplorables are dead.

[Steely Tom]

Something new for Facebook and Google to suppress.

[Bobalu]

[NWFree]

Dr Fubar can’t wait to test it on babies 🤪

[House Atreides]

Oh noooeeee… I’m gonna have Acute Coronary Syndrome!

[nascarnation]

Gundry...that's the guy on all my iPhone pop up adverts.

[Aria]

I wonder how many people I know will drop dead from this. I had one J&J in March and was tested AGAIN the other night - no clots - normal EKG and one other test that I don’t know the name of. But still....not sure if I’m still at risk or not.

[Terry L Smith]

556 folks out of jow many millions?

also, no mention of ‘the other guys’ just moderna.
smells fishy.

I’ve had the 2 moderna shots, and with the tw(*)t running the cdc, and her 2 shots are none idiocy, im just cya and getting the booster.

and yup, my blood fouls the dialysis machine, at least once a week. but its better to foul the machine than to keep it inside me!

[Buttons12]

I have a friend whose husband got chest pains and severe nausea after a covid shot. I think it was in March. He recovered but now she’s saying he has an “enlarged” aorta. I don’t know if that’s the same thing as an aneurysm but he’s walking around like it’s not serious. Before that shot he was in good health, no issues at all, and had regular checkups.

[ifinnegan]

This is a typically poor article.

Paragraphs 3-5 are good in spreading the information of the new study in Circulation.

That’s good and appreciated.

Here is the study’s abstract and link

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

[ransomnote]

The DailyExpose is a good publication - good enough to reliably attract the same trolls.

[PMAS]

***

[laplata]

“Oh noooeeee… I’m gonna have Acute Coronary Syndrome”!

You shouldn’t have gotten the jabs.

[DannyTN]

Is this a temporary risk increase or a long term risk increase.

I think we all knew that blood clots and heart attacks and mycarditis and periocarditis were all included in the risks of the vaccine. Rare but a risk. Those same risks occur if you get covid.

In other news, I drove by the cemetery the other day, and everyone there was dead.

[Seruzawa]

If it follows the usual track record the site will post increasingly lurid exaggerations and lies to the point where Jim Robinson finally says, “Enough!” And thus cometh the ZOT.

[ransomnote]

There is no valid test for ‘Covid’. They deny all treatments to those with respiratory illnesses who test postive. Treatment reduces risk of hospitalization and death by 85% - that’s why the CDC/NIH/FDA/FAUCI/WALENSKY all pretend there are no treatments.
The risks of myocarditis and pericarditis for those having the “vaccine’ are intentionally minimized and dismissed. It’s not a rare risk and certainly not the same risk as if you get whatever collection of illnesses they have deemed ‘Covid’ via their fake test.

[ransomnote]

Seruzawa wrote:

If it follows the usual track record the site will post increasingly lurid exaggerations and lies to the point where Jim Robinson finally says, “Enough!” And thus cometh the ZOT.

This website publishes good information, better than the MSM (New York Times, CNN etc.) and that's why it reliably draws trolls out of the woodwork who denounce the publication and all who think the CDC and Wuhan Fauci may not be telling the truth.

[bagster]

If it follows the usual track record the site will post increasingly lurid exaggerations and lies to the point where Jim Robinson finally says, “Enough!” And thus cometh the ZOT.

Rah rah sis boom bah
Yay censorship!

Do you work for Facebook?