CDC Scientists admit they did manipulate study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women as researchers discover 91% of pregnancies resulted in miscarriage following Covid-19 Vaccination

TheExpose.uk ^ | NOVEMBER 7, 2021 | THE EXPOSÉ

[ransomnote]

In July 2021, The Exposé exclusively revealed how data had been manipulated by scientists carrying out a real world study for the CDC to show that Covid-19 vaccines were safe for use during pregnancy.

The authors claimed that the number of people to suffer a spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) during the study was 104 out of 827 completed pregnancies, equating the risk of miscarriage at 12.6%; 7 – 12% lower than the risk of miscarriage in the general population.

Source

However, our analysis proved that these numbers were extremely misleading due to the fact that of the 827 completed pregnancies, 700 / 86% of the women had received a dose of either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the third trimester of pregnancy, meaning it was impossible for them to suffer a miscarriage due to the fact they can only occur prior to week 20 of a pregnancy.

This meant that just 127 women received either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the first / second trimester, with 104 of the woman sadly losing their baby.

Therefore the rate of incidence of miscarriage was 82%, not 12.6% as presented in the findings of the study, and the authors of the study have since admitted that they made a mistake, issuing a correction six months too late, because the study has been used to justify Covid-19 vaccination of pregnant women and new mothers around the world.

Source

But now two researchers from New Zealand have re-analysed the study and called for countries to halt the administration of Covid-19 vaccines to pregnant and breastfeeding women immediately due to extremely concerning findings.

The correction resolved some of the issues, but there are still more, according to Dr. Simon Thornley, a senior lecturer in the University of Auckland’s Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Dr. Aleisha Brock, another researcher in New Zealand.

According to Dr Thronley “The article’s conclusions haven’t changed substantially as we believe is warranted from our re-analysis of the association related to early exposure to the vaccine in pregnancy, which indicates a substantially increased risk from background.”

Thornley and Brock re-analysed the data and calculated the incidence of miscarriages in the first trimester was actually 82 percent (as concluded previously by The Exposé) to 91 percent in a paper (see here) published in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law.

Source

Of the 827 pregnancies reported through the V-Safe registry, operated by the CDC, 712 resulted in a live birth. Nearly all of them were among women who were vaccinated in the third trimester. Of the other pregnancies, 104 resulted in miscarriage. Most of those occurred before 13 weeks of gestation.

Using data from the study and several estimates, the New Zealand researchers calculated that spontaneous abortions occurred in 81.9 percent to 91.2 percent of the women who were vaccinated before 20 weeks of gestation.

Thornley and Brock conclude in their analysis that they ‘question the conclusions of the Shimabukuro et al. study to support the use of the mRNA vaccine in early pregnancy, which has now been hastily incorporated into many international guidelines for vaccine use, including in New Zealand.’

‘The assumption that exposure in the third trimester cohort is representative of the effect of exposure throughout pregnancy is questionable and ignores past experience with drugs such as thalidomide. Evidence of safety of the product when used in the first and second trimesters cannot be established until these cohorts have been followed to at least the perinatal period or long-term safety determined for any of the babies born to mothers inoculated during pregnancy,” they added.

Pfizer, it was noted, says on its vaccine’s label that the available data on the vaccine “administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy.”

The CDC researchers concluded their findings didn’t show any obvious safety signals among pregnant women who received the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. They said their findings did not necessarily represent the position of the CDC, but the agency links to the study on its website and used it to promote vaccination in pregnant women.

Dr Brock and Dr Thornley strongly disagree and state that considering the evidence presented in their analysis, that they suggest the ‘immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy (Category X)[41] and those breastfeeding, alongside the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines to children or those of child-bearing age in the general population, until more convincing data relating to the safety and long-term impacts on fertility, pregnancy and reproduction are established in these groups.’

As per the latest MHRA Yellow Card data which includes reports of adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines (estimated between 1 – 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported) submitted up to October 28th 2021, a total of 623 women have reported suffering a miscarriage as an adverse reaction to a Covid-19 injection.

This includes 369 reports made against the Pfizer mRNA injection.

Source – Page 73

Two-hundred-and-fifteen reports made against the AstraZeneca viral vector injection.

Source – Page 90

Thirty-seven against the Moderna mRNA injection.

Source – Page 35

And 2 where the brand of Covid-19 vaccine was no specified in the report.

Source – Page 26

The question is, how many of these spontaneous abortions were suffered following the use of a study in which CDC scientists manipulated the data to justify the safety of administering a Covid-19 vaccine during pregnancy?

[hawkaw]

🤦

[CrimsonTidegirl]

Sorry, but that’s not good enough.

[Glinda Whatsit]

Bookmark

[Whatever Works]

“I may seem dimwitted because I am not going to absorb all this data. I will just say I’m tired of being lied to, tired of being mislead by CDC who can’t find their way out of a bag, and Fauci, who is ‘all glorious’. This ‘all things Covid’ worship has to stop.”

Amen!

[blueplum]

” during the third trimester of pregnancy, meaning it was impossible for them to suffer a miscarriage due to the fact they can only occur prior to week 20 of a pregnancy.”

LOL - So how one defines a word defines mortality? Yes, you can miscarry an unborn child in the third trimester. Whether it’s called a miscarriage or a still-birth is immaterial.

Almost all spontaneous abortion occurs in the first 13 weeks. From the above article footnotes, 92% of the abortions in the report were, in the first 13 weeks.

From the above article reporting of the “Yellow Card” reporting system for the UK, 623 British women have had a miscarriage following vaccination - out of 81,000 pregnant women given the vaccine as of Oct 11 (NYT figure). The Yellow Card system also doesn’t give any information as to what may have complicated the 623 pregnancies.

One in five of England’s most critically ill Covid patients are unvaccinated pregnant women
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/11/world/pregnant-women-covid-vaccine.html

Physicians in UAB Medicine’s Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine report than 39 unvaccinated pregnant women have been admitted to UAB Hospital this month. Of those, 10 are in the intensive care unit and seven of them are on ventilators.These are extraordinary numbers of pregnant women for UAB’s ICU, says Steve Stigler, M.D., director of UAB Hospital’s Medical Intensive Care Unit.

https://www.uab.edu/news/health/item/12238-uab-hospital-icu-population-includes-alarming-number-of-pregnant-women

Doctors see surge in unvaccinated pregnant patients critically ill with COVID-19
Their deterioration is quicker,” said Dr. Todd Rice, director of Vanderbilt’s medical intensive care unit.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/wellness/doctors-see-surge-in-unvaccinated-pregnant-patients-critically-ill-with-covid-19/ar-AANKcP4

Through September 27th, there were more than 125,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in pregnant people including more than 22,000 hospitalized and 161 deaths; of which, 22 deaths occurred in the month of August alone. Cases... have a two-fold risk of admission into intensive care and a 70 percent increased risk of death [and] are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes that could include preterm birth, stillbirth, and admission into the ICU of a newborn also infected with COVID-19.
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0929-pregnancy-health-advisory.html

[Jane Long]

So profound, with your drive by profanity....and, nothing to back up YOUR opinion.

🙄

[Jane Long]

Slimes......CDC.....msn.....

Seriously?

From the person who thinks keeping one’s health record private, is abhorrent.

What part of “CDC scientists admit” are you not following, vax troll?

Defending these shots, especially for pregnant women, when previous experimental shots/drugs have historically been excluded from being given to pregnant women.....is just beyond reprehensible.

[Mark was here]

Thanks for the answer.

I had covid earlier this year. I really have not seen that my natural immunity is not sufficient. I don’t want the jab and I am not willing to hurt my employer. FJB

[Mark was here]

Thanks for the answer.

[ARW]

From you article…

“ In Norway, although vaccination during the first trimester is not recommended…”

How come it’s not recommended?

[Jim Noble]

IDK. At the time the study was done that was the rule in Norway. Based on the study results, it’s now recommended.

[ARW]

No they are not…the current guidance from Norway gov…

“ As a precautionary principle, pregnant women are not usually recommended to be vaccinated in early pregnancy.”

[EasySt]

Problem: Bad News getting out about the vaccines (Or whatever)
becomes unavoidable.

Fix: Immediately publish over the top stories that are somewhat worse
than the truth, then debunk the over the top portion of those stories.

Result: The ugly truth gets dismissed with the debunked portion.

Rinse and repeat as necessary.

(More and more our daily life experience…)

Are we getting it yet?

[sarge83]

There should be criminal prosecutions for crimes against humanity. I await the FR vax proselytizers arrival to defend their warped science.

If these women can’t sue big Pharma they should sue the CDC, NIH, WHO and the doctors, scientists and spokesmen who shoveled their lies and syringes of death!

[SomeCallMeTim]

Ping2

[greeneyes]

👍You Betcha.

[blueplum]

Pregnant women are routinely encouraged to get a flu vaccine and a pertussis vaccine, and, possibly, HepA/B. Pregnancy planning includes getting current on all missing vaccines at least one month prior to becoming pregnant, especially MMR. If you apply to careers that involve patient or people contact, vaccinations are a job requirement, as are TB tests for those applying to work in schools and health care facilities such as nursing or rehab homes.

I’d wager 80% of working Americans have ‘given up their health records’ by peeing in a cup for employment/continued employment over the past 40 years with not an eyelash batted. If a commercial provider underwriters reject you for their group coverage, the employer is privy to the reason. They are also privy to the claims made against that policy for the year (as part of premium actuarial analysis and/or workers comp claims made)

Everything is ‘experimental’ when in the middle of a novel virus pandemic. Some things are less experimental, like experimental monoclonals or experimental vaccines which have been proven to save lives. (7 billion doses/18 months track record)

THose who have moved past the home remedies and whatifs of 2020 and look to the advancements in treatment developed in 2021 against a faster moving virus than 2020 aren’t trolls. They just have a different opinion and outlook than those who cling to the past and attempt to paralize others with fear into doing nothing.

[Jane Long]

I await the FR vax proselytizers arrival to defend their warped science.

---

Oh, they’re already here, attempting to do so. Daily.

[ransomnote]

Frankly, I don’t understand why anyone of childbearing age gets the jab. I will not be surprised to see too many sterile young people and too much pregnancy loss in the next 18 months or so.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They are frightened and shamed into getting the jab.
Walensky is one of the medical oligarchy who put out a message urging pregnant women to get vaccinated, hinting that Covid-19 can harm the baby and saying, “We’re not seeing any evidence...” that the vaccine would harm the baby.

So the women getting vaxxed were proud to get the vax and “know that they’ve done everything in their power to protect baby”. For some, it seems like a right of passage for them, their first active step in their role as mama bear - that’s how they seem to see it.

In social media posts, there are the posts which say “This Mom-to-be is now 100% vaccinated” and a smiling pregnant woman, followed later by a ‘lost the baby’ post. Those women didn’t know, but the CDC/Fauci/NIH/Walensky always knew.