Read the full Investigation herePosted on 11/01/2021 8:32:50 PM PDT by ransomnote
On October 31st we revealed how an investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.
The investigation uncovered several shocking findings, including that 100% of deaths reported to VAERS as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections were caused by just 5% of the batches produced.
Dr Mike Yeadon, former Vice-President of Pfizer, has detailed his thoughts on the conclusions of the investigation of VAERS data below.
By Dr Mike Yeadon
This information about different safety profiles of different “lots” (batches of finished product of covid19 vaccines) is completely without precedent.
I’m thinking about it and I don’t yet have clear in my mind what the envelope of plausible / possible explanations are.
But the bottom line is that the majority of lots were associated with good short term safety, few hospitalisations & deaths, which is true for both the Pfizer & Moderna injections.
But in both cases, a small number of vaccine lots are associated with incredibly high rates of adverse events including deaths.
How can this possibly happen? Drug manufacturing is performed to exacting standards of control. The ‘active’ agent is made in batches. It cannot be guessed how many doses each batch makes, because no one has ever made commercial scale mRNA products before.
But each batch of what’s called “drug substance” is then used to formulate, fill, pack & label various lots of finished drug product.
Testing methods are developed for all of the manufacturing steps, together with standards for the results to be considered acceptable.
Something happened between drug substance & drug product which resulted in a small number of finished lots for distribution which were destined to kill huge numbers of people.
1. Errors made in the final steps of manufacturing which resulted in certain batches bring reasonably benign & others extraordinarily deadly. I just cannot imagine the kind of mistakes which could produce such radically different clinical profiles. For example, poor handling during shipping & storage prior to administration to people. Problem I have with this is that such handling errors (eg allowing temperate to rise way above limits defined in stability testing) usually result in drug product which doesn’t work properly, as it’s degraded, not in drug product that’s incredible dangerous.
2. At some point in manufacturing, someone or some entity actively modified what was being filled into vials, and it was this which resulted in extreme skew of clinical safety profile.
There has been so much truly awful behaviour of “elites” that I’m simply not willing (as I would have historically) to dismiss the possibility that this has been done on purpose.
What I do know, and this is a test of whether there’s the slightest sign of integrity from these companies as well as the regulatory agencies, is that all use of the affected produce must immediately cease, all batches of drug substance & lots of drug product should cease.
The materials should be recalled to a place of stable storage & an intense analytical investigation initiated.
Unless factors are found which adequately explain the huge differences in clinical adverse event profiles, administration to humans must not restart.
If the manufacturers do not exhibit sufficient control of drug product, the authorisation they hold from various regulatory authorities are utterly voided.
Just when you thought this debacle couldn’t possibly get any worse, it gets much worse.
Expect to hear more about this.
Meanwhile, who in their right mind would roll up their sleeve?
PING
And that kids, is why immunity from lawsuits was wrong and unjustified.
So which states got the most deadly batches? Red states perhaps???
Dr. Jane Ruby (on Stew Peters)
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/11/vaers-reveals-death-by-lot-number-specific-states-get-certain-vials/
Albeit, since the VAERs data is suppressed (many adverse events never being reported), I'm not exactly sure how this muddies the data. I.e., maybe some of the lot to lot variance is due to the data not being reported on lots that were sent to particular locations. So of course the VAERs reports would show those lots as being fairly clean. See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.
“including that 100% of deaths reported to VAERS as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections were caused by just 5%”
I find that 100% number makes this entire claim suspicious. In fact considering the source of the article then I am calling BS on this entire claim. Think about that 100% number. It does not really make sense.
Interesting comment, at link....
Rose
5 hours ago
Likely directed in early release to elderly:
This report shows 336,000 injuries occurred before March 31 with the CDC massively backloading data and withholding submission dates. They targeted the elderly with Midazolam and morphine,
and this was (mostly) a period when the vaccine was restricted to elderly population so it was likely a continuation of their early protocol against our seniors:
Also, they changed the STORAGE TEMPERATURES IN MIDDLE OF FEBRUARY – they said it was for easier logistics but that makes no sense because if the vaccines needed to be stored at a certain temperature for viability, logistics wouldn’t be a factor – they might have just raised the temperatures after they did their early sweep of elderly vaccinations and neutralized whatever harmful ingredient was inducing early deaths (remember the spike in care home deaths)
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-pfizer-idUSKBN2AJ1CJ
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/108340
Yeah, I’m with you. A whole lot of pretty sketchy internet sources with some pretty wild claims. If they were reliable, at least some of the national politicians who have been outspoken critics would be speaking out on this data.
Non-sequiter reasoning aside, this means it can't be guessed if one batch is worse than another based on the number of adverse events.
If one batch was twice as big you would expect twice as many events.
Good grief, this is middle school level stuff.
I read an article today quoting Pfizer saying the lot sizes ranged from 1 to 3 million doses, yet this "analysis" treats them as if they were the same size.
Are the numbers and types of adverse events the same for Pfizer and Moderna? If so, then did BOTH companies have the same QC problems? If the QC problem is limited to Pfizer, then Moderna safety should be considerably higher (assuming that whoever made Moderna vax didn’t have its own quality problems).
It would be too obvious if everybody who got the vaccine died. That’s why the need “boosters,” because most of the time you will be getting a placebo. Just like playing a slot machine where the jackpot is a.trio to the morgue.
“Yeah, I’m with you. A whole lot of pretty sketchy internet sources with some pretty wild claims. If they were reliable, at least some of the national politicians who have been outspoken critics would be speaking out on this data.”
pols have for the most part been awol (bought and paid for).
claims no more wild than biden and the cdc have made.
they seem to have found bad reactions related to bad lots. not far fetched at all.
That Polish scientist who recently analyzed several batches of the “vaccine” found that several of the vials he obtained were nothing but saline solution.
I would not take the crap now even if I thought it was good for me but this may give some relief to those who have taken the jab.
things that make you go s...!
So what this says is that the deaths and adverse reactions are not random, not inexplicable, not having to do with individuals and their random physiology but instead it has to to with IMPURITIES or some other crap in the vaccine!
Just incredible.
Does anyone in their right mind believe a thing this giverment has said about this scamdemic?
Yeah, buddy, I want me some of this crap right in my arm! NOT!
This should be HEADLINE news but it won’t be.
The bad batches were the “vaccine” the rest were placebo. Experiment not working. I’m still part of the control group.
I think the bad batches are the “vaccine” the rest are placebo. just my thots.
I’ve been thinking for a while now they target groups or individuals. Perhaps they know which batches to use against certain populations.
I worry Florida will be attacked again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.