Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/01/2021 8:32:50 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Cathi; Unrepentant VN Vet; metmom; Fractal Trader; SecAmndmt; bagster; doc maverick; ...

PING


2 posted on 11/01/2021 8:33:09 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

And that kids, is why immunity from lawsuits was wrong and unjustified.


3 posted on 11/01/2021 8:45:55 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

So which states got the most deadly batches? Red states perhaps???

Dr. Jane Ruby (on Stew Peters)
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/11/vaers-reveals-death-by-lot-number-specific-states-get-certain-vials/


4 posted on 11/01/2021 8:47:41 PM PDT by Qiviut ("Fear is the 'virus'. TRUTH is the Cure." [Mikki Willis])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
Thanks for the posting.
I first saw this data on the Stew Peters show today (actually at Frankspeech.com). The lady reviewing the data said that 12 States only received the 'good lots'. That happenstance could have been coincidental.
She said that she was trying to find out the States who received the various lots, but at the time of the showing she did not know (and perhaps the data will never be available). It could be interesting, but it might also just be another random factoid.
Nonetheless, interesting if the VAERs anomalies (which show a much higher incidence seen on the CoVid shots vs prior vaccinations) are due to a quality control issue. I.e., some lots are relatively 'fine' (understanding that 'fine' means that they provide minimal protection against CoVid infections for a few months, but also minimal chances of negative side effects), but a few lots are virtual poison to the unlucky recipients.
Hopefully the digging through the data continues.

Albeit, since the VAERs data is suppressed (many adverse events never being reported), I'm not exactly sure how this muddies the data. I.e., maybe some of the lot to lot variance is due to the data not being reported on lots that were sent to particular locations. So of course the VAERs reports would show those lots as being fairly clean. See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.

5 posted on 11/01/2021 8:50:55 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
If silicon wafers had 95% yield, those companies would probably go out of business. And this is death these vaccine companies are dealing out.

6 posted on 11/01/2021 8:58:13 PM PDT by Kevmo (I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

“including that 100% of deaths reported to VAERS as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections were caused by just 5%”

I find that 100% number makes this entire claim suspicious. In fact considering the source of the article then I am calling BS on this entire claim. Think about that 100% number. It does not really make sense.


7 posted on 11/01/2021 9:01:41 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Interesting comment, at link....

Rose
5 hours ago
Likely directed in early release to elderly:

This report shows 336,000 injuries occurred before March 31 with the CDC massively backloading data and withholding submission dates. They targeted the elderly with Midazolam and morphine,

https://www.unite4truth.com/post/covid-19-treatment-dnrs-attributed-to-early-death-clusters-in-care-homes-hospitalized-others

and this was (mostly) a period when the vaccine was restricted to elderly population so it was likely a continuation of their early protocol against our seniors:

https://www.unite4truth.com/post/2-400-covid-19-vaccine-deaths-occurred-in-first-six-weeks-of-program-cdc-back-loading-data

Also, they changed the STORAGE TEMPERATURES IN MIDDLE OF FEBRUARY – they said it was for easier logistics but that makes no sense because if the vaccines needed to be stored at a certain temperature for viability, logistics wouldn’t be a factor – they might have just raised the temperatures after they did their early sweep of elderly vaccinations and neutralized whatever harmful ingredient was inducing early deaths (remember the spike in care home deaths)

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-pfizer-idUSKBN2AJ1CJ


8 posted on 11/01/2021 9:12:25 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
We’re they stored improperly?

https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/108340

9 posted on 11/01/2021 9:14:12 PM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
It cannot be guessed how many doses each batch makes, because no one has ever made commercial scale mRNA products.

Non-sequiter reasoning aside, this means it can't be guessed if one batch is worse than another based on the number of adverse events.

If one batch was twice as big you would expect twice as many events.

Good grief, this is middle school level stuff.

I read an article today quoting Pfizer saying the lot sizes ranged from 1 to 3 million doses, yet this "analysis" treats them as if they were the same size.

11 posted on 11/01/2021 9:20:23 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Are the numbers and types of adverse events the same for Pfizer and Moderna? If so, then did BOTH companies have the same QC problems? If the QC problem is limited to Pfizer, then Moderna safety should be considerably higher (assuming that whoever made Moderna vax didn’t have its own quality problems).


12 posted on 11/01/2021 9:28:35 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Everything Woke turns to shit.” ~ President Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

It would be too obvious if everybody who got the vaccine died. That’s why the need “boosters,” because most of the time you will be getting a placebo. Just like playing a slot machine where the jackpot is a.trio to the morgue.


13 posted on 11/01/2021 9:30:16 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

That Polish scientist who recently analyzed several batches of the “vaccine” found that several of the vials he obtained were nothing but saline solution.


15 posted on 11/01/2021 9:34:47 PM PDT by Blurb2350 (posted from my 1500-watt blow dryer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

I would not take the crap now even if I thought it was good for me but this may give some relief to those who have taken the jab.


16 posted on 11/01/2021 9:42:56 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.I ha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

things that make you go s...!

So what this says is that the deaths and adverse reactions are not random, not inexplicable, not having to do with individuals and their random physiology but instead it has to to with IMPURITIES or some other crap in the vaccine!

Just incredible.

Does anyone in their right mind believe a thing this giverment has said about this scamdemic?

Yeah, buddy, I want me some of this crap right in my arm! NOT!

This should be HEADLINE news but it won’t be.


17 posted on 11/01/2021 10:02:59 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.I ha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

The bad batches were the “vaccine” the rest were placebo. Experiment not working. I’m still part of the control group.


18 posted on 11/01/2021 10:23:39 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

I’ve been thinking for a while now they target groups or individuals. Perhaps they know which batches to use against certain populations.
I worry Florida will be attacked again.


20 posted on 11/01/2021 10:39:44 PM PDT by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

From the comments at The Expose.

BTW, how reputable are The Expose? Just asking if anyone knows them? I read their about and they claim they are just people like some of us who are disgusted with media and giveryemnt lies. It does not look like they made up the data.

Question:

The fact that the vaccine companies distributed the more deadly batches differently from the more benign batches means that the companies knew that those deadly batches were distinctly different before distribution. That means that it was planned out in advance to distribute widely the death and hospitalizations from the COVID-19 vaccines. This proves intent!

Answer:

Simply put, YES. It would surely appear to be that way.

Isn’t it also amazing how much information the VAERS dB contains? A dB that has been condemned as inconclusive and subject to fraud in spite of being more or less the gold standard for monitoring of all manner of vaccines for three decades? It is so useless that CDC / FDA in their October 20 presentation last year cited VAERS as the primary means to monitor the vaccine performance and adverse effects which is necessary being there was no extended trial?

This stinks to high heaven. How many ways do we have to know we have been scammed before we call BS? I did long ago but the sheeple have not woken up.


21 posted on 11/01/2021 10:44:08 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.I ha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
its called TARGETING.....certain areas are being targeted and I am not surprised....

thx to all the branch covidians who insisted on lockdowns from the get go....

28 posted on 11/01/2021 11:18:56 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

“For example, poor handling during shipping & storage prior to administration to people.”


I expressed concern about that fact since the day it was reported that some of the ‘vaccines’ would require super-cold storage. At the time it was the #1 reason I stated that I’d refuse the jab, now one of many.

There is no pattern, so it’s unlikely a manufacturing problem...unless Pfizer has an unreported plant problem like J&J.

But with no liability, where’s the motivation to get it right?


35 posted on 11/02/2021 3:25:58 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Is the VAERS data being manipulated in such a way that people will conclude that this is just a manufacturing issue that must surely have been corrected by now?

That way people will stop worrying about getting the jab now and in the future, and stop all this “my body, my choice” silliness and willingly submit to their masters.


36 posted on 11/02/2021 3:46:50 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (You are not a horse, you are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson