“including that 100% of deaths reported to VAERS as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections were caused by just 5%”
I find that 100% number makes this entire claim suspicious. In fact considering the source of the article then I am calling BS on this entire claim. Think about that 100% number. It does not really make sense.
Yeah, I’m with you. A whole lot of pretty sketchy internet sources with some pretty wild claims. If they were reliable, at least some of the national politicians who have been outspoken critics would be speaking out on this data.
The data was harvested directly from VAERS, the article provides a link for you to verify, that is pretty transparent if you want to make the effort to look.
They show every event recorded by lot number and every lot number that had no deaths. Again, pretty darn transparent.
I really don’t care to sell you and don’t need to because you are looking for a reason to dispute the study. Others may want to learn something though. I don’t believe everything I read either but the burden of proof is on the giverment and the most credible and consistent information is not coming from that source.