Posted on 10/31/2021 4:13:34 AM PDT by ransomnote
An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.
But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.
The data used in the investigation was pulled from the publicly accessible VAERS database which can be viewed here. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a United States programme for vaccine safety, co-managed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The programme collects information via reports made by doctors, nurses, and patients about adverse events (possible harmful side effects) that occur after administration of vaccines to ascertain whether the risk–benefit ratio is high enough to justify continued use of any particular vaccine.
The reports pulled from the database were ones that had been submitted up to October 15th 2021 and they included all adverse reactions reported against the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injections, as well as all adverse reactions reported against the influenza vaccines; which were used to generate a control dataset .
The VAERS database showed a total of 1,608 adverse event reports against the flu vaccines alongside 15 deaths and 73 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 494.
The ‘lot number’ is a specific string of numbers and letters that tracks a specific batch of vaccine from production and into a persons arm and it is usually found on a vaccine label or accompanying packaging.
The above chart shows the number of adverse event report made to VAERS against the influenza vaccines sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event.
Except for a few spikes the number of adverse events per lot number was generally the same, with no more than 26 reports being made against a single lot number of influenza vaccine.
The above charts shows the count of lots by number of reports of adverse reactions per lot for the influenza vaccines. It shows that 33% of the lots (165 / 494) only had a single adverse reaction report made against them, whilst just 0.6% of the lots (3 / 494) had at least 20 adverse reaction reports made against them.
The above chart shows how many times a specific lot number was identified in an adverse reaction report of which the person had died following vaccination against the Flu. Ninety-seven-percent of the lots (480 / 494) were associated with zero deaths, whilst 13 lots were associated with a single death and 1 lot was associated with 2 deaths.
The above chart shows the number of states within the USA a specific log number of the influenza vaccine was distributed to.
The VAERS data shows that 44% of the lots (219 / 494) were sent to just a single state within the USA, whilst a further 17% (86 / 494) were sent to 2 states, 10% (50 / 494) were sent to 3 states, 5% (24 / 494) were sent to 4 states, 3% (17 / 494) were sent to 5 states, 2% (11 / 494) were sent to 6 states, and just 0.4 (2 / 494) were sent to 12 states within the USA.
All of the above data was then used as a control dataset to compare against VAERS data for the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.
The VAERS database showed a total of 171,463 adverse event reports against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,828 deaths and 14,262 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 4,522.
This data alone shows that there have been 106 times as many adverse reactions, 189 times as many deaths, and 195 times as many hospitalisations due to the Pfizer Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.
The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event. We do not have reliable information about standard lot size, but news articles indicate an average lot size of 1000 vials (approx. 6000 doses).
The highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the influenza vaccine was 26. Which makes it all the more shocking to discover that the highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine up to October 15th 2021 was 3,563, and this isn’t an anomaly.
Thousands of adverse event reports have been made against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine numerous times, and unfortunately the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine hasn’t fared any better.
The VAERS database showed a total of 188,998 adverse event reports against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,603 deaths and 10,225 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 5,510.
This data alone shows that there have been 118 times as many adverse reactions, 174 times as many deaths, and 140 times as many hospitalisations due to the Moderna Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.
The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event, and it shows that the Moderna jab fared even worse than the Pfizer jab in this department with the highest number of adverse event reports against a single lot number of Moderna Covid-19 vaccine totalling a staggering 4,967.
The above chart shows the count of lots against the range of adverse events reported per lot of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. The data reveals that 2,908 lots (64%) had just a single adverse event report made against them, whilst 2 specific lots had over 3000 adverse event reports made against them.
Shockingly we can also see from the data that 30 lots of Pfizer vaccine had between 1,000 and 1,499 adverse event reports per lot, another 20 lots had between 1,500 and 1,999 adverse event reports per lot, and another 23 lots had between 2,000 and 2,499 adverse event reports per lot.
This suggests that there were a small quantity of dangerous batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine and a large quantity of seemingly harmless (at least in the short term) batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.
But the investigation of VAERS data also revealed that reported deaths due to the Pfizer vaccine were again only associated with certain batches of the jab. The chart above shows that 96% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,828 reported deaths were associated with just 4% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine.
Five lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each, a further 5 lot numbers were associated with 81-100 deaths each, and just 2 separate lot numbers were associated with over 100 deaths each.
The same can be seen for the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine. Ninety-five-percent of the lots of Moderna vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,603 deaths were associated with just 5% of the lots of Moderna vaccine.
Thirteen lot numbers were associated with 41-60 deaths each, 2 lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each and 1 lot number was associated with 81-100 deaths.
The investigation of VAERS data also found that specific batches of the pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines which were distributed to between 13 and 50 states across the USA had an unusually high number of adverse event reports and deaths compared to lots that were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA
As you can see from the above table 4,289 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA, recording 9,141 adverse event reports against them alongside 99 deaths and 657 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 2 adverse event reports per lot and 0 deaths and hospitalisations.
However, a further 130 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to between 13-50 states across the USA, recording 166,170 adverse event reports, 2,799 deaths, and 14,155 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 1,278 adverse event reports per lot number, alongside 22 deaths and 109 hospitalisations.
This data therefore shows that each lot from the 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people.
The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘EK9231’; causing over 3,500 adverse event reports.
The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘EN6201’ causing almost 120 deaths.
The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports against the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘039K20A’; causing over 4,000 adverse event reports.
The second most harmful batch of Moderna vaccine was assigned lot number ‘041L20A’, and media reports show that it was actually recalled by the Orange County Healthcare Agency in January 2021 following reports of allergic reactions.
The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘039K20A’ causing almost 100 deaths.
This investigation of VAERS data reveals several concerning findings which warrant further investigation, but it also leads to questions of why authorities within the USA which are supposed to monitor the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines have not discovered this themselves.
The data clearly shows that the Covid-19 vaccination campaign has been significantly more harmful and deadly than the influenza vaccination campaign. This fact alone begs the question as to how the FDA advisory committee could possibly vote Seventeen to Zero in favour of approving the Pfizer vaccine for use in children aged 5 to 11.
One voting member of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee admitted that it will not be fully known whether Pfizer’s vaccine is safe for 5 to 11-year-old children, until it begins being administered.
Dr Eric Rubin of Harvard University said – “We’re never going to learn how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes”.
But the investigation of VAERS has also identified the specific batches of Pfizer and Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm across the USA, which leads to other extremely serious questions requiring urgent answers.
Why is it that certain batches of the vaccine have proven to be more harmful than others?
Why is it that certain batches of Covid-19 vaccine have proven to be deadlier than others?
Why is it that the most harmful and deadly Covid-19 vaccines were distributed across the entire USA, whilst the least harmful and deadly were only ever distributed to a few states? Was this done on purpose?
Could this just be a quality control issue?
A Pfizer whistleblower from a Kansas manufacturing facility did after all reveal that “People are being made to sign off on things that normally they wouldn’t, and then they wonder why their own employees won’t take it”.
I gotta admit he has more experience being obtuse that anyone else I can recall off the top of my head...
Not just 13 states, it could have been 30, 40 or all 57.
True...here's why.
Missiles are missiles. Its science.
My bullshit meter has been set to LOW SENSITIVITY. And it is flashing at highest level of the scale on this story.
Please stay with me for a minute.
All of a sudden they are putting out all these minute details on the result of these clot-shots? Haven’t they been telling us that the shots are perfectly safe?
I am glad for them to dig deeper into what may be “different” about these Lots. (Maybe we call the the Lot’s wife batches?) But I think we have all learned that we can’t trust the “scientists” at these institutions with all the built-in conflicts of interest.
Ding! Ding! Ding!
Well, we all know it is an experiment.
I don't think you can conclude that from the VAERS data because VAERS doesn't attribute cause of death. That's not a half truth, it's a fact.
I acknowledge the number of reported adverse events, including deaths, may exceed any previous vaccine but I think the reason may be simple - we've never had a mass vaccination with a new vaccine and all of the attendant publicity. I think events are much more likely to be reported with the Covid vaccines than the other widely administered ones.
I think someone who has heart issues two weeks after a flu vaccination is much less likely to report it to VAERS than if they had the same event two weeks following a Covid shot.
The flu shot has been so common for so long that people are much less likely to consider it as a possible cause when something happens to them.
The same is true for tetnus, MMR, TDAP, etc.
The CDC and FDA also review the VAERS events and conduct additional safety monitoring.
Based on these reviews they haven't identified widespread harm from the vaccinations.
This is why I asked if you thought the CDC was lying. They've examined the incidents and concluded that the vaccines aren't causing deaths.
Now you may say you do think they're lying, which implies a massive conspiracy, but I don't see how you can deny the facts about what they say or what VAERS represents.
I believe you are deliberately ignoring the facts, cherry picking snippets of data, and misrepresenting CDC disclaimers to serve your masters.
I believe you are a dishonest craven liar and are serving your ultimate boss, the Prince of Lies himself.
Yet you can't see your way clear to identify one of those lies or misrepresentations.
Perhaps I missed something. Prove me wrong.
You're the one accusing me of lying. I believe the burden is on you.
Also, one needs to consider that the VAERS reporting is supposedly very incomplete. It is reportedly a time-consuming hassle to fill out the VAERS forms, AND ... there is no extra funding to encourage comprehensive reporting. In fact, the system is built to DISCOURAGE the reporting of adverse events.
Nonetheless, if we assume .... never mind. That gives this entire “study” a veneer of legitimacy which is not deserved.
"The investigation of VAERS data also found that specific batches of the pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines which were distributed to between 13 and 50 states across the USA had an unusually high number of adverse event reports and deaths compared to lots that were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA"
Actually reading reports like this make my head hurt for some reason. Wife's out of town so I'm stuck watching football. ;-)
Better than perfectly safe, so safe and effective you are the next best thing to a murderer if you don't get jabbed as many times as we tell you to.
So why indeed?
Let me speculate (and keep in mind I run the Nut-Job Conspiracy Ping List, so I can really get way out there if I put my mind to it!).
There can come a time in any con, in any war, in any charade when people start to realize that the end is in sight, and they are on the losing side.This is a major crack, just one of many to come, in the dam.Perhaps they have noticed in increased interest in war crimes and crimes against humanity trials. The chiefs are probably doomed, even if they have made contingency plans.
The Nazi elites squirreled away funds in Switzerland, made travel arangements to Argentina, or arranged to get vaccuumed up by Operation Paperclip. Some of them got away with it.
The bottom level, the front line foot soldiers pretty much escaped.
The managers and apparatchiks who knew, or could be expected to know, the big picture, the actual crimes, and actively supported the Reich and didn't have the means to get out of Dodge didn't fare so well.
The only possible defense, the only slim hope is to be able to assert: "I was just like you, I got snookered! I really though we were all doomed unless we did such and such. BUT as soon as I found out I did all I could to stop it! Did you see how I exposed the lie, at considerable risk to my life, the lives and freedom of my family, and our fortune! I rang the alarm bell! They were trying to get me when the lie collapsed. I was one of them. I became one of you!" or something along those lines.
Damn them all...
Mine too, yet we do anyway.
Some people seem to enjoy finding ways to color the data to please their masters.
I doubt they will find much value in those 30 pieces of silver when they realize how much they lost earning them.
Because you brought it up.
Some day you Q-turds will learn not to bring up subjects that make you look like a complete morons.
Meanwhile...
Evidence that supports a helicopter:
- Radar data of a helicopter in that location, at that time.
- Confirmation from the crew that flew the route.
- An image that matches the light trails left by the moving boats in the same video, which is consistent with what one would expect from a long exposure shot of a vehicle with multiple lights.
- Basic photography knowledge that moving objects generally disappear on long exposures, confirmed by the boats in the video.
Evidence that supports a missile:
- It looks like a missile
True story. That shiznit looked exactly like a missile
in that picture y'all were all getting ruffled up about.
Me, I'm just trying to see where AF1 was in that picture.
Because, you know, without seeing any TARGET for that heli-missile... well...
It's just kind a picture of some smoke, ain't it?
You're probly right, bumpkin. Cause everybody knows missiles can only target things within eye sight.
But keep trying, you're getting warmer.
#ProudOfMyBoy
Why, because I called you 'helicopter boy'? Well, that's your moniker. You are forever known as the boy who sees helicopters.
Evidence that supports a missile:
- It looks like a missile
- Q said it is
- Q would know
I rest my case.
Some day you Q-turds will learn not to bring up subjects that make you look like a complete morons.
And some day you norm-tards will figure out that your derp dance to pretend things aren't what they are makes you look like prancing gaylords with brain damage.
Now back on topic, helicopter boy. Get busy defending the derp state covid/vax hoax. The vax ain't gonna pimp itself.
All of these shots are deadly. That is all anyone needs to know.
So what is it that makes that picture show that AF1 is being targeted?
It's a missile, it's smoke. How do y'all figure what the target was?
Imagination, that's how. You can't prove Jack Sheets.
Some one of the former Qtard luminaries said so.
Well whoop-de-do and a pile of poo, that proves nothing.
But hey.. I'll admit... sure looks like a missile to me.
Are there any other missile pix that you figure were aimed at AF1?
Look, here's some kids throwing rocks at Trump!
No, Trump ain't in the picture but I'm telling you they are some
naughty little leftist rock-throwers and thank Baby Jesus they didn't hit Trump.
Either your theory isn’t that nutty on the face of it or things have gone so quickly from the furtive imaginations of conspiracy theorists to stone cold reality in the last 18 months that it would take a bona fide paranoid schizophrenic tripping on acid and suffering 48 hours sleep deprivation to actually come up with something far-fetched these days.
Because I don’t think the average person coming up with the average conspiracy theory is really doing a good job of coming close to identifying the true motivations and machinations of the true conspirators who actually exist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
