Please Support FR
Click The Pic To Donate.
On what basis?!
Sounds like another example of black robes legislating from the bench.
Aren’t wolves...dangerous?
“...after hunters exceeded their kill limit by nearly 100 wolves...”
Splitting hairs, here. Between 80-100 (I forget exact #) wolf tags are set aside for the Native Americans to hunt, though they never hunt them so it was basically a wash and hunters stayed within the limits.
But, I guess they lost this round on a technicality.
I wonder how many of these ‘animal activists’ who live in and around ‘The People’s Republic of Madiston’ and only see SQUIRRELS from their apartment windows, have lost their house pets and livestock to wolves?
I’m willing to venture, NONE.
3 Ses
Shoot, Shovel, and Shut-up.
Wolves…..the friendly Wal Mart greeters of the woods.
I wonder if the judge would keep the same view if a pack of wolves ate his granddaughter?
Idiot.
Please Support FR
Click The Pic To Donate.
1. I’m sure the dairy farmers will applaud this move
2. Diana, my sister works for the WI DNR. I’ll have to ask her about this.
But then again, she hates hunting. I said to her, “Have you ever eaten meat from the grocery store in styrofoam trays?”
At least animals caught in the wild, if they are lucky enough get a good hunter (no, Biden’s son is probably not a good shot), have a quick death.
Unlike the cattle raised in captivity.
To me, anyone who eats meat and complains about hunting is a hypocrite.
All the donations they get from people thinking they are saving innocent little kittens and puppies go to their lawyers suing the states' to stop hunting practices.....
“The order comes as part of a lawsuit wildlife advocacy groups filed in August seeking to stop the hunt and invalidate a state law authorizing annual seasons”
So maybe there will be a wolf overpopulation and when looking for food backyard pets and maybe kids will be their targets. Kinda reminds me of California bowing to environmentalists and letting the forests go untouched until the state burns down. Now the environmentalists are pushing to ban fossil fuels to “save the planet”. Don’t expect them to give up their Hummers.
Ban the wolf hunt? There is NO WAY the wolves will comply. I doubt they can read, or would even recognize the legitimacy of the court if the could.
Those wolves will hunt.
Wolves should be trapped and relocated into the judge’s community and the communities of those on the wildlife group.
The wolf quota was 200. They harvested 218.
The Natural Resources Board set the next quota at 300, attempting to get the wolf population back toward the stated goal of 350. It is currently at about 1,000 or more. To bring the population down, they have to harvest at least 300 wolves, probably more than 400.
The Department of Natural Resources (DNR), which is governed by the board ignored the governing body and said we set the quota, not you, a first in Wisconsin history. Even the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel was shocked. It was done by the DNR with the cooperation of Governor Evers, I am sure.
Now the judge says "no hunt". It is all to screw the people in the rural North of Wisconsin, who are the ones who have to live with the wolves.
Dane County (Madison). That’s all you need to know.
I think it is good to have scary animals in the deep woods. I propose we only allow hunting of large predators on public lands with hand held pointed wooden sticks. And you have to eat them, there, then, in the woods.
I have a rifle that can hit a pie plate at a thousand yards. What fun is it to shoot an animal with it? It’s no fun.
When I go camping, I would rather run in to a wolf pack than a troop of entitled millennials. Come to think of it, could we have an entitled millennial season? We could kill them with pronouns and male toxicity!
This judge need to watch what a few wolves can do to dogs and livestock.
Check around and see how many people have packed up their picnic baskets to go look at the wolves.
It’s not about looking at wolves.
If there are no wolves in WI, then this wouldn’t be a problem. Hunters should make the wolves ‘disappear’ and no more tax dollars will be spent on the issue.