Posted on 10/02/2021 12:42:08 PM PDT by bitt
Is There a Georgia Election Fraud Connection? No investigation into election integrity and legalities in Arizona would be complete without taking a serious look into the ballot printing.
Arizona’s Attorney General, Mark Brnovich, requested more information from the Arizona Senate following the release of the report from the forensic audit in Maricopa County last week.
On Monday, Brnovich’s Election Integrity Unit sent a letter regarding the 2020 General Election in Maricopa County.
“The Arizona Senate’s report that was released on Friday raises some serious questions regarding the 2020 election,” Brnovich said. “Arizonans can be assured our office will conduct a thorough review of the information we receive.”
Maricopa County officials in Arizona failed to cooperate on crucial matters in the recent forensic election audit. Evidence was obviously removed or destroyed even prior to their subpoena.
According to “official” results, Joe Biden won over President Donald Trump statewide by only 10,457 votes.
However, the audit revealed serious questions on at least 57,722 ballots, more than five times that number.
🔹Tens of thousands of people voted from a prior address, which would technically invalidate the votes if the enforce election law is enforced.
🔹10,342 voters potentially voted in more than one county.
🔹Over 9,000 more ballots were returned by voters than were sent out.
🔹In over 3,000 instances, the official results do “not match who voted.”
🔹There were 2,592 more duplicates than original ballots.
🔹There were 2,382 in person voters who had moved out of Maricopa County 29 days prior to the election.
🔹2,081 voters had moved out of state during the 29 days preceding the election.
🔹Hundreds of votes were cast by people who were not part of the official precinct register, or returned by mail from people who had not been sent ballots.
The ballots in Maricopa County were printed by Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix, Arizona, but many questions remain about these particular ballots.
Who filed a U.S. Patent Application for a computer system for “on-screen ballot duplication” to be used for “generating a revised ballot”?
According to application # 20190311030, Kevin Runbeck did:
....more..
p
Unpossible
Wow, this article is a deep dive and may explain where a lot of ballots came from after 3 Nov. Basically printed as needed to swing the results or to make up for that overnight bump that Biden got.
Stats like these don’t mean much. What we need are actual names of fake and duplicate and voters.
A handful of them confirmed with ironclad certainty is what will break the fraud.
They’re are capable of far more “impossible”. Hate to leave it right but know better.
I'm afraid we are in a moment in history, where the criminality is so ubiquitous it's no longer considered evil because there's no one in power to stop it.
Nothing is impossible if $$$$ is applied at the right point to lubricate the deal.
One of the presenters of the audit results on Friday said they have photos of people sitting at the machines deleting and over writing election data, the day before the machines were to be given to the auditors.
To loud applause, the presenter said “We have the names, but we are not going to make them public here”.
Holding my breath waiting for this all to be resolved. Start by prosecuting Maricopa election officials and decertifying the election results. Then go after illegals that voted and the ones that voted multiple times.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.