>> in those under 50 repeated vaccination is, on balance, more-dangerous than the virus and in those under 18 it is always more-dangerous even from the first use.
Predators are going after the youth.
All this sounds really good Karl, but you are basing this on the premise that we live in a nation of laws, we live in a Nation of Men and the Law means what we want it to mean when we need it, got it?
Seriously: that doesn't matter.
It's a Brave New World.
These are obviously too-broad ranges but they're the CDC's numbers. We could take a stab at disentangling them using the NYC Coroner data, for example, and I have -- but we don't have to in this case because the CDC has provided enough data on their own, within the Federal government, to complete the analysis.
VAERS says the risk of death shortly following vaccination for Covid-19 is at least 15,386 / 200,000,000 (remember, this is "died with" not "died of" in both cases of vaccination and infection) or 7.69/100,000. This, by the way, is wildly higher than that for the flu shot (about 20-30 deaths per year across 170 million shots delivered) and thus is very unlikely to be a coincidence.
But even that analysis is too generous to the vaccine. It doesn't correct for the greater incidence of vaccination than infection. They want to vaccinate everybody, whereas maybe only 30% of the population might contract COVID, at least to a degree that they'd end up getting counted in the stats. So to be apples to apples, you need to calculate the risk of dying from/with COVID for the ENTIRE population, both infected and uninfected, which would make the author's point even more strongly.
Good read, thank you.
Sue the bastards!
Can we get a team of about 1,000 really aggressive, really nasty lawyers to go after this hammer and tongs for about six months pro bono? It would do the country an enormous service.
Ping
The judiciary is not going to save us.
On to the next option.
The major constitutional problem with government “vaccine” mandate is this imo. Non-elected governent bureaucrats, like those under the umbrella of the unconstitutional (imo) Health and Human Services Department, don’t have the express constitutional authority to make such decisions imo.
More specifically, the delegates to the Contitutional Convention had intended for popularly elected government officials to accept the risk of getting voted out of office for voting the unpopular way on such decisions. (Government health officials perhaps need to be popularly elected.)
Unfortunately, corrupt career lawmakers have learned the dirty trick of front-ending their legislative responsibities with unconstitutional, so-called government regulatory agencies so that non-elected bureaucrats can make lawmakers’ unpopular regulatory decisions for them.
This unconstitutional transfer of power not only gives crook lawmakers a way to keep their voting records clean, making it easier to get reelected, but it also scandalously weakens the voting power of ordinary citizens.
Insights welcome.
The ultimate remedy for unconstitutionally big, alleged election-stealing, Democratic Party-pirated federal and state governments oppressing everybody under their boots...
Consider that all the states can effectively “secede” from the unconstitutionally big federal government by doing the following.
Patriots need to primary federal and state elected officials who don’t send voters email ASAP that clearly promises to do the following.
Federal and state lawmakers need to promise in their emails to introduce resolutions no later than 100 days after start of new legislative sessions that proposes an amendment to the Constitution to the states, the amendment limited to repealing the 16th and ill-conceived 17th Amendments.
A new term to remember: “Vaccinazification”. Using an illusory threat of a disease to impose fascist controls over others.
No, they are not! Sheesh! Look words up before publishing!
Corona viruses are a large part and an ever mutating member of the, "common cold". We shut the world down for a bad strain.
“So can an employee ever be forced to be vaccinated on the premise of protecting others? Maybe.”
uh no. there is no “maybe.” the right to informed consent for any health procedure is an individual right under our system. no blanket rule can be enforced on an individual without that individual’s consent or the gov’t must allow due process to inflict any coercion. the fact that biden is already using coercion with vaccine mandates is illegal in my view.
in fact **any** coercion negates informed consent and is immoral and illegal.