Posted on 09/27/2021 5:27:21 PM PDT by nickcarraway
The painting superimposes the visage of Diego Rivera, Kahlo's husband, over the space where her third eye would be.
Frida Kahlo’s indelible image has permeated the cultural membrane so thoroughly, it stands to reason her artworks tend to do incredibly well at auction, and an upcoming auction at Sotheby’s seems destined to continue this trend: scheduled for this November, the planned sale of Kahlo’s gorgeous Diego y yo (Diego and I) is predicted to net upwards of $30 million. The painting is reportedly the last bust portrait the artist completed before her death in 1954, and depicts how Kahlo conceived of the overlapping intellects shared between herself and her prolific husband, the monumental muralist Diego Rivera.
Towards the end of her life, Kahlo was bedridden after having her leg amputated; nevertheless, she continued to work and to pay homage to her husband, who was her constant companion. Rivera championed his wife’s work regularly. “I recommend her to you, not as a husband but as an enthusiastic admirer of her work,” Rivera once told Picasso. “Acid and tender, hard as steel and delicate and fine as a butterfly’s wing, lovable as a beautiful smile, and profound and cruel as the bitterness of life.”
Diego y yo is a profound example of their connection: Kahlo painted the visage of her husband at the center of her forehead, directly where her third eye would be in a more spiritual portrait. However, she also chose to render Rivera’s face with a third eye, creating a doubling effect that speaks to the artist’s deep wells of insight and foresight.
“A painting by Kahlo of this quality and excellence is a rarity at auction,” Julian Dawes, the Co-Head of Impressionist & Modern Art at Sotheby’s New York, said in a statement. “When I look at this painting, the phrase ‘abre los ojos,’ Spanish for ‘open your eyes,’ immediately comes to mind. In the literal sense, it refers to the penetrating stare of Kahlo as the sitter of the portrait (and the double portrait of Rivera), but I think it also symbolizes the incredible moment this painting will surely usher in for Kahlo, as the market opens its eyes to Kahlo in a new way and secures her place in the auction echelon she belongs.”
I wonder if there is any confession in the painting that she and/or Diego murdered Leon Trotsky for the big guy?
Say...she wasn’t a moonbat crazy Commie was she?
AND she had a mustache! I mean a real mustache!
Isn’t his third eye upside down?
I’m pretty sure she was. Typical German.
I’ll never understand art.
Frida Kahlo is an icon among secular feminist hispanic women. She’s pretty much famous for being famous, and much like Maya Angelou among black women, is admired by those who know almost nothing about her. Kind of like the young idiots that admire Che Guevera.
Which is why it makes no sense she would house Leon Trotsky aka Emmanuel Goldstein, the most hated man in Sovietdom.
Unless, she and Diego had orders to icepick him.
I also read Julius Rosenberg may have driven to Mexico related to that.
The first time really WAS a surprise.
Don’t understand art? Contact Hunter! He’s a very successful artist and I’m sure he can explain all
As crazy as she was ugly.
Yep
Rivera’s third eye is looking up, an obvious reference to his unconscious longing for God, reinforced by the triangular “trinity” composition of eyes above her unibrow. The portrait also refers to the Five Eyes intelligence network, which Kahlo believed had its “eyes” on them. bs/
The Mexican Communist Party’s job was to keep an eye on Trotsky and his aides (I met one of his personal secretaries, George Novack, many years ago. Intellectual lightweight).
When Trotsky became a threat to Stalin, the NKVD was ordered to have Trotsky killed. Other Mexican/Soviet painter/agent, Siquieros, also once tried to kill Leon but failed.
Frieda was a hardcore communist/killer and I don’t think a great painter. Sort of a female Hunter Biden minus the talent and icepick.
Trotsky was never a threat to Stalin. Certainly not after he was no longer in the Soviet Union. He was just the necessary boogie man for their two minute hate. And, let’s face it, there was more than a little anti-semitism in their demonization of Trotsky. Which they inherited straight from Karl Marx.
The Chief Rabbi of Moscow went to Trotsky to plead for the plight of Russian Jews. Trotsky told him he was a communist, he didn't consider himself Jewish. The Chief Rabbi said, "The Trotskys make the revolutions, the Bronsteins pay the bills." [Bronstein was Trotsky's birth name.]
No, that’s normal for Venusians.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.