Temperature Dependence of Maximum Excess Power in 3 New Experiments (Letts, Parkhomov, & Mizuno)

*Dept. of Engineering Physics & Dept. of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing CHINA ^ | June 2020 | S.X. Zheng* , G.S .Huang, Z.M. Dong, C.L .Liang, B. Liu, S. Chen, J. Tian, X.Z. Li

[Kevmo]

HuangC: Temperature Dependence of Maximum Excess Power in 3 New Experiments (Letts, Parkhomov, & Mizuno)

S.X. Zheng* , G.S .Huang, Z.M. Dong, C.L .Liang, B. Liu, S. Chen, J. Tian, X.Z. Li

*Dept. of Engineering Physics & Dept. of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing CHINA

At ICCF-21, the resonant surface capture model was proposed to relate the inelastic process (Excess heat) to the elastic process (Diffusion); then, we are able to derive the straight line behavior in the semi-logarithmic plot.

Three sets of experimental data supported this model as Fig.1 (Ed. Storms, M. Fleischman, and Tsinghua Univ.). After ICCF-21, three new sets of data are available (Letts, Parkhomov, and Mizuno) to test this model (Fig. 2, 3, & 4).

The agreement is very well, but only the maximum excess power for each temperature follows this straight line behavior. It implies a hidden variable which controls the excess power at each given temperature. Only if this hidden variable matches the optimum value; then, the system might reach its Optimum Operation Point as named by M. Swartz.

(1)Dennis Letts’ Pd cathode heavy water electrolysis. A tunable laser was used to trig the excess heat in parallel with a gold coating. Only if the thickness of the gold coating was right, a peak of excess power appeared as a function of laser frequency. Among 9 peaks, 8 peak points (black) are on the straight line from 56.5 oC to 81.25oC.

(2)Parkhomov’s Ni-H gas-loading system. Only if the temperature was higher than 1000oC, excess power was measurable. For each given temperature the excess power reached it maximum in the early period of operation. After 225 days, the fuel was exhausted, and no excess power was measurable. 10 points are on the straight line from 1167 oC to 1856oC.

(3)Mizuno’s Ni-Pd gas-loading system (R-19 reactor). During 92 days operation with H2 gas, among 55 data points only 4 maximum power were found on this straight line from 23.64 oC to 382.7oC.

This resonant surface capture model is based on Bethe’s solar energy model (the weak interaction) and Oppenheimer’s Nuclear stripping reaction model (the strong interaction); therefore, there is no strong neutron or gamma radiation accompanied with excess heat, and it may work for high Z materials to explain Miley, Iwamura, Biberian and B. Liu’s nuclear transmutation data as well.

Many thanks to Drs. Letts, Parkhomov, and Mizuno for their kindness to make their data available in advance.

[Kevmo]

As Temperature goes up, Max Excess Power [MEP] goes down. This suggests a Bose Einstein Condensate is triggering MEP.

Images: https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366&bih=625&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=%22Temperature+Dependence+of+Maximum+Excess+Power%22+in+3+New+Experiments+(Letts,+Parkhomov,+%26+Mizuno)&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjtt_vmqJbzAhWMTjABHa9mBGMQjJkEegQIGhAC

[Kevmo]

for the cold fusion ping list

[Wonder Warthog]

The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles

Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
chat—science

—

http://lenr-canr.org/

Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y

Best book to get started on this subject:
EXCESS HEAT
Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette

https://www.abebooks.com/9780967854809/Excess-Heat-Why-Cold-Fusion-0967854806/plp

---

Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts

If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc. ~Jim Robinson

---

This topic has a following, people who wish to learn and discuss the materials presented.

Please refrain from posting anything that doesn’t legitimately address the issue.

Something is going on in this segment of science. There are a considerable number of research groups studying the matter. -Sidebar Moderator

---

The issue isn’t whether we allow skepticism, it is whether we allow hyperskeptics and skeptopaths to ruin the scientific dialog. Civil discussion of the involved science is desired.

---

[Steely Tom]

I wonder where are the physicists from MIT who said cold fusion was poppycock, that Pons and Fleischmann were sloppy in their procedures and didn’t know how to do calorimetry, who declared “The Death of Cold Fusion” back in 1989? We don’t hear much from them anymore.

I know of one who for sure is no longer among the living, so maybe that’s a factor.

[BobL]

“Three sets of experimental data supported this model as Fig.1 (Ed. Storms, M. Fleischman, and Tsinghua Univ.). After ICCF-21, three new sets of data are available (Letts, Parkhomov, and Mizuno) to test this model (Fig. 2, 3, & 4). “

I remember the Fleischman name from the Cold Fusion days 30 plus years ago. Seems he was on to something after all!

[Wonder Warthog]

"I know of one who for sure is no longer among the living, so maybe that’s a factor."

I suspect it is. I forget the exact quote and who said it, but it ran something like "paradigms change one death at a time".

The rest are probably too embarrassed to open their pie holes.