Here’s Why No One Can Force You to Take Pfizer’s Newly ‘Approved’ Comirnaty Vaccine

Children’s Health Defense ^ | 8-30-21 | Meryl Nass, MD

[Meah]

On Aug. 23, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued its approval (also known as a license) for Pfizer’s Comirnaty COVID vaccine.

The FDA documents related to the vaccine’s approval are as difficult to understand as the new brand name is to pronounce.

According to the FDA, although Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine is now approved, considerable amounts of the vaccine will remain under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

Also, the approval of the Comirnaty vaccine was limited to adults over age 16 receiving their first two doses.

Vaccination with the EUA Pfizer-BioNTech or the Comirnaty vaccine in the 12- to 15-year age group, or providing a third booster dose of either, are still considered an unapproved use — however, those uses remain authorized under EUA.

FDA made some clear but cagey statements about the differences between the Comirnaty vaccine and the Pfizer-BioNTech EUA vaccine.

For example:

“The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”

What does that statement mean? What, specifically, are the “certain differences” that make the two vaccines “legally distinct?”…

[dragnet2]

No stinking employer should have the right to threaten to fire people if they don't get some questionable injections put into their bodies. People don't work at these companies for life, so the employer should not demand something of the employee which can negatively impact them for the rest of their lives. This is way beyond reasonable.

It seems that you insist that the employer has no rights

I did not imply or suggest that. Nice spin slick.

I'd expect that type of response from the posers at CNN. Nice job.

[firebrand]

I personally know many people who have been vaccinated with no ill effect, or a very mild one.

I finally ran into an old friend the other day who developed a symptom, tinnitus.

I also know several people who have lost family to covid.

If you want to get anecdotal.

[samkatz]

It’s ebonics, silly.

As in, we need to get this vaccine out into our COM-IRN-ATEE.

[Petrosius]

If a PRIVATE employer decides to mandate vaccinations — that is his prerogative.

NO IT IS NOT! My private medical choices are none of my employer's business.

[BiglyCommentary]

So what invasive medical procedures does an employer have a right to demand you have performed? That is the real question. Hand amputations to diminish the chance you steal from them? How about having to take tranquilizers so you don’t annoy people at meetings? WHERE DOES IT END?

[ready2brd]

There is enough case history and legal guidance that any cases against employers are going to fall flat

[Petrosius]

The employer does not owe the employee a living. The employee is not bound to the employer — it is a two way street. It seems that you insist that the employer has no rights and must be subject to the whims and thoughts of the employee. It is a two way street. If the employee disagrees with employer — the free market says he can take his talents to a competitor.

The only proper relationship between an employer and an employee is a full day's wages for a full day's work. An employee's personal medical decisions are none of the employer's business.

[Petrosius]

So what invasive medical procedures does an employer have a right to demand you have performed? That is the real question. Hand amputations to diminish the chance you steal from them? How about having to take tranquilizers so you don’t annoy people at meetings? WHERE DOES IT END?

We do not have to worry where it ends if we do not allow it to begin. Private medical decisions are just that, private.

[wgmalabama]

Good summation. The good Dr doubles down on his vanity.

[BiglyCommentary]

So name some invasive medical procedures that employers demanded in the past.

[BiglyCommentary]

IT ENDS NOW but only if people do not just meekly give up their basic rights and freedoms.

[dragnet2]

That's because these concoctions they're injecting into people clearly affect people differently. I'm neutral meaning I don't care who does or doesn't get the jab. But I think it's undeniable some people have become pretty messed up and or dead. Based on this, I think for anyone who chooses to refuse these jabs is perfectly legitimate. And it's my opinion these employers are waaay out of their league demanding people get injected under threat, if they want to keep their jobs.

[Petrosius]

Where are the Republicans proposing legislation protecting the private medical decisions of individuals from corporate and government diktats? As usual, they want our support at election time but offer us no protection in exchange.

[ready2brd]

Vaccines have been required for employment and school for decades. You can claim this isn’t a vaccine till you are blue in the face, but that is a simple fact.

It is very clear that no cases will succeed for termination because of jab refusal. And, contrary to what many Freepers post, one is usually not eligible for unemployment after quitting or termination.

Every major company will be requiring this soon, so buckle up.

[SheepWhisperer]

Lies

Read your propaganda for months.
You’re an angry poison pusher.

Here’s a good plan going forward.
You want the toxins and risks, fine,v take the the risks you desire, but do not post your propaganda to young minds here.

Here’s an even better idea...
You claim to be a doctor

Fine

POST YOUR BONA FIDE NOW.
REAL NAME
REAL ADDRESS
REAL PRACTICE
REAL BOARD CERTIFICATIONS
REAL Degrees with institutions issuing then and years issued

My real doctor had this prominently displayed
Put up or shut up.

IF YOU DON’T, YOU’RE A FRAUD

IF YOU DO, YOU OWN THE LIABILITY FOR ALL MEDICAL ADVICE YOU DISPENSED HERE and AND! We will file a complaint for every diagnosis, perception, medical advice you posted without seeing any FR PATIENTS. Welcome to liability insurance land!

THIRD OPTION... SHUT THE F UP.

PICK ONE
Choose wisely alleged “Dr”

Oh...pretending to be a doctor and dispensing medical advice is a PERSONAL liability to you, your assets and current and future income.

Liar, liability disclosure, or simple loser?
Which will it be?

One of these will be hung on your user name from tonight forward.

we’re waiting g-A$$dr

Yes.
Im calling you out

Your reply will have consequences.

I’ll even up the pressure with a courtesy ping here to the bag-man to make sure your reply is echoed for weeks

So...we’re waiting

[musicman]

"Who pays me ...."



Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Battle !!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

[walkingdead]

“you dont believe in at will employment or an employers rights.“

So what if an employer mandated sterilization for its employees? I mean when a woman goes out of paternity leave, it is a hardship to the company right? Is this within employer rights?

What if an employer mandated speed pills so you could work longer and harder? Is that within their employer rights?

The slope on which you stand, is so very slippery, I am surprised you are not flat on your back already.

Quite simply no employer has the right to mandate anything to be injected into any human being. And if you think the title “employer” grants them some super power to disregard all that freedom holds dear, then you are in fact supporting an employer based fascism.

[zeestephen]

Re: Comirnaty - What the hell is that?

CO-MI-RNA-TY

CO - COVID

MI - Mitochondrial

RNA - Ribonucleic Acid

TY - Thank You?

[Meah]

This article is right over the target because it triggered our Troll in Residence. (Perhaps employed by a government agency?)