Brian Kennedy of the Claremont Institute states that the administration's Afghanistan move "WAS DONE ON PURPOSE," as part of the Great Reset to demoralize our Military & reduce America's position globally

Ping

Guy has a point, but never underestimate the “stupid factor” of Obama’s ass kissing, boot licking generals.

Totally believable. And what I also think.

IMHO it’s obvious it was deliberate. I can’t comprehend how an entire administration, with all the resources available to them, could screw this up this badly.

It’s not just a little “hmm...in hind-sight we could’ve done a couple of things better”. It’s more like “anybody would do everything differently”.

He left an arsenal of weapons to our enemy and then surrendered to them, all while leaving our citizens behind enemy lines.

TREASON. It is quite clear.

Certainly believable, and not at all surprising.

Remember what Lara Logan told Tucker “This is happening because the United States wants it to happen”. She said we can see through walls....we were watching it in real time...we knew the taliban was coming fast...and we could have stopped it any time.

Our government is run by traitors to the Constitution. They’re murderers, liars, and thiefs. I can barely believe what danger we are in.

So supposedly Biden droned the ISIS planner - well how exctly did they know where he was? First I doubt they actually did this but if they did why didn’t they use the same technology to stop this whole disaster in the first place? Answer: Because as Lara Logan said “The United States wants this to happen”.

What is most alarming is how completely the DS controls our Military. I thought SCOTUS was the last straw but I was wrong - this is.

NO ONE should believe Biden bombed the ISIS “planners” UNTIL THEY ARE NAMED. Even then, be suspicious.

bfl

Yah, I went way overboard here... too big for most FR’s to have time or attention for.

Treason and Sedition are applicable to both American civilians and anti-American military.

My best guess, if the shoe were on the other foot -

AND

1 - Trump had been involved with massive anti-American and international conspiracy to commit actionable and national scale election fraud (which is in reality a *hard evidence attempted effort to formally end the US Constitution)

2 - Trump had taken massive campaign money from foreign enemy powers (through his family) ahead of election - money derived from enemy powers seeking to overthrow the legitimate US government

3 - Trump had been involved in using his authority (in conspiracy with US intel and rogue DOJ) to fraudulently frame his presidential opponent, using false foreign enemy derived “evidence” (RUS), to carry out multiple very real coup attempts, and including leftist ideologically rogue Gen Staff and foreign born officer operative’s (Vindmans)

4 - Trump had been treasonously installed

5 - Trump had then *intentionally recklessly* paid back to our enemy, large blood fought and US held nations (plural) and their citizens (knowing they were going to get slaughtered), to the same enemy powers which had enriched his family, AND proactively committed massive election fraud to install him as their foreign puppet/pawn president over the US to begin with

6 - And Trumps general staff, IC, DHS/CISA (we have proof), etc..., had been involved in *JOINT enemy nation conspiracy to unleash a mild gumby Bio-Weapon to steal and end US elections, then used his own rogue leftist nominated anti-American DOJ-FBI, DHS, IRS, etc..., to end the entire US Bill of Rights, and his rogue anti-American leftist agency heads fraudulently framed, set up, and imprisoning all US citizen dissenters, and denied them their Constitutional rights...

IF TRUMP, (and all involved in his conspiracy) HAD COMMITTED ANY OF THESE VERY REAL CRIMES, HE (they) WOULD HAVE ALREADY BEEN LAWFULLY EXECUTED !!!

And likely after a LAWFUL MILITARY TRIBUNAL!!!

What is really going on here is much bigger.

Strategically, this intentional Afghan debacle formally eliminates what some of us have for years referred to as the “Iranian Straddle” (or also the “ME-Wall”, or “The Fire Wall”).

Very important, and Right or Wrong, the Reagan/Bush era (1980’s 1990’s) derived “IR Straddle” or “The Fire Wall” strategy, was initially aimed largely at blocking, or significantly slowing further Russian development (including foreign advanced RUS proxy WMD Research & Development), of Iraqi and Iranian nuclear power (later known as “Iran as RUS Nuclear and Bio/Chem War Proxy”). Putin’s effort went into unprecedented overdrive in 1998 (under Clinton). Both Iraq and Iran had long been external diversified Russian WMD R&D proxies and theater (battle space) weapons storage and staging proxies.

[[An aside — not unlike Russian GRU affiliated (and German based Paragon Group/SCYTL affiliated Lazarovich) Alexandre Lazarovich’s *EXTERNAL Serbian cyber/crypto team developed a clever Python variant of IBM’s SMOTE called SMOTE-B designed to throttle and control elections. It is this code which was/is today the underlying code used in *DoD/CIA SCORECARD to throttle and decide target elections. SMOTE-B was and is also integrated into all former Diebold (Soros owned) voting platforms, as well as all current Smartmatic (a RUS/CHI controlled company in VEN) integrated platforms, which include Canadian based Dominion (Soros run), ES&S, and Hartintercivic (Romney owned) platforms = equaling 80% percent of all US voting platforms, from 2008-2020.]]

— Since 1997, Russian *EXTERNAL efforts much more heavily infiltrated (Paris based) French Pasteur Institute’s located globally (*Pasteur as proxy), which were heavily tied to, and financed by NIH’s NIAID director Dr. Fauci. Beside their P4 labs in Wuhan (and one other P4 lab in China) and Havana (Cuba), Tehran, Iran has long been home to one of the Pasteur Institute’s prolific P4 labs. While not at all alone, there was significant Russian (Siberian P4 bio lab) and Chinese P4 “traffic” involving the Pasteur Tehran P4 lab. This was logically part of Bush 43’s “IR Straddle” calculus.

— In the run up to the 1991 Gulf War, while Iran was the greater threat, (even while both Iraq and Iran wanted to take Saudi Arabia), Russia had at least 12 segregated and joint Iraqi (*as proxy) WMD R&D storage and staging sites.

Several of these were deep Russian engineered UFAC’s, designed for more stable long term WMD storage (mostly Chemical Weapons Storage), some of which could/can last for well over a generation. Beside potential regional use, this also allowed the Kremlin to circumvent some WMD R&D scrutiny, and WMD weapons volume scrutiny.

In 1991, in the middle of all the “stupid” brought on by Saddam Hussein and his (Moscow backed) socialist Baath Party taking Kuwait, taking portions of Northern Saudi Arabia, and hitting Riyadh and Israel with Russian SCUD’s, the US and NATO took control of most of the Iraqi WMD sites.

Some of the smaller sites were destroyed. Larger sites were much more involved and dangerous. Large convoys of Chemical Weapons trucks and other weapons, were destroyed mostly attempting to exfill to Syria. Russian officers and personnel were some of those killed in the CW convoys enroute to Syria. WMD convoys were also destroyed attempting exfill to Iran. However, some vehicles made it through to both Syria and Iran.

NATO put in place a “No Fly Zone” over most of Iraq. The large WMD sites were foolishly turned over to the UN for security. From 1993-2003, there were hundreds of ground breaches into WMD sites in Iraq.

The largest Chemical Weapons site was known as Al Muthana. Al Muthana was a deep UfAC West of Balad, Iraq (estimates over 4700ft’feet deep).

In 1991, after roughly two weeks of US DoD and NATO inspection, Al Muthana was estimated to contain approx 160 thousand drums of mostly chlorine, but also very large volumes of other mixed CW. The media and internet were carefully scrubbed.

Between 1993-2003, Al Muthana was breached nearly 1800 times. WMD proliferation had become a critical issue. The largest breaches involved highly organized efforts from Syria. As Russian engineers would complete construction of hardened underground facilities (UGAC’s) in Syria, there would soon after be convoys of CW trucks entering Iraq at high speed, which would include obvious collusion from Hussein in Iraq, to enable the convoys to move across checkpoints and canals, to and from Al Muthana, back into Syria.

In violation of his own signature agreements with the UN, NATO, and the US, Hussein then went all in with mostly China and Russia, to rebuild much more advanced SAM sites, and including reconstruction of his Army. To pay for it, he would give Russia and China the largest energy fields in Iraq. Germany and France also violated UN and NATO agreements, and were also involved in rearming Hussein. This was done by violating the UN “Oil for Food” agreement to keep the Iraqi people from starvation. (Ironically, when Bush 43 went back to war with Iraq, leftist psyops campaigns, and leftist organized rallies around the world targeted Bush 43 with slogans like “Blood for Oil”, when it was entirely leftist governments which were doing all of weapons for oil deals with Hussein, and causing Iraqi people to starve.

Afer 9/11, Hussein gave Al Qaeda training sites, logistics support, and cash, in an effort to strengthen and enable Al Qaeda.

In this timeline, keep in mins, Hussein has been simultaneously working with the Kremlin to exfill CW from Iraq to mostly new Syrian UFAC sites.

In 2003, Bush 43, working with all Clinton Intel Community people, desired to organize another multi nation coalition, before invaded Iraq.

However, arguably, as a terminal and tactical political error, Bush 43 wanted to get UN condemnation of Hussein in Iraq, so he could build another multi n as tiin coalition
against Hussein.

Condemnation of Hussein and Iraq was primarily held up by Russia and China in the UN Security Counsel. Worse, Putin demanded focus of Iraqi WMD’s (with efforts yet under way for Russian WMD exfill to mostly Syria), and any investigation into CW whereabouts be ended.

Putin firther threatened to cut off critical US military air space into Northern Afghanistan, which we were heavily dependent on in our war with Al Qaeda, and the Taliban who were supporting them.

HOWEVER !

While cloaked, the actual reason for all US efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan, were from the beginning, STRATEGIC.

While there were other very significant factors, the STRATEGIC motivation was the “IR Straddle” or “The Fire Wall”.

Iraq and Afghanistan were the Russia and China blocking “Straddle”. “The Fore Wall” was also used to temper or hinder efficient Pakistani - Iranian activity.

Pakistan ISI was already largely aligned with China against India.

China is now moving quickly to establish energy and logistic routes not just to Iran, hut to Iraq and Turkey.

Sorry for the many mistakes!

I sent that from my small phone.

They intentionally threw the war to teach us a lesson.

Remember the late actor Ron Silver. He was upset at a military flyover during the Clinton inaugural. Then he thought "Those are our planes now" and was happy.

Those are -- or were before the Taliban got them -- Team Biden's planes, helicopters, humvees and and guns. I doubt they'd intentionally throw them away.

They aren't going to do anything that could cost them the power they've been after for so long.

You must ask your self this basic question, if I wanted to deliberately sabotage a military operation by violating nearly every principle of sound operational and tactical doctrine, would I have organized this debacle in any manner other then that in which it has shown to have been arranged? I think that the answer must surely be a resounding NO!!!!, if you assume even the most bare bones level of competence of ANY party associated with it.

But that's what failure is. It's when everything goes so wrong that it looks like it must have been intentional. France in 1789. Russia in 1917. France again in 1940. China in 1949. Jimmy Carter in 1979. It looks like it must have been intentional, but you can go broke underestimating the capacity of political elites to mess things up.

absolutely terrible!!!!!!!!!

Bttt!

There was something recently on FR or possibly elsewhere about the Taliban and the Afghan government making a deal. That could have been part of it, if true.

It’s almost as if we should hold our elected officials accountable or something. /sarc

Just as it was deliberate to shut down domestic oil production.

Just as it was deliberate to open the southern border.

The deliberate destruction of our nation.

If only….

I go to Claremont Institute’s age, and click on his bio to read his articles. His are nowhere to be found—Stephen Hayward’s are. I click the link to his twitter feed, and his account no longer exists.