Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

There are no consequences for doing or failing to do anything in the Democrat Party. This is funny.

Forgive me if someone already posted this.

1 posted on 08/27/2021 9:42:26 AM PDT by FryingPan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FryingPan101

Paperwork errors, if inadvertent are often are to enforce. That the “witnesses” signed is a nice complication. What did they witness?


2 posted on 08/27/2021 9:46:29 AM PDT by Reno89519 (Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101

Does anyone think a Virginia court will remove him from ballot, will any prosecutor take up the perjury of the witnesses?


3 posted on 08/27/2021 9:47:39 AM PDT by Reno89519 (Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101

Silly Wepublicans!
Wules are for everyone EXCEPT Democwats!


4 posted on 08/27/2021 9:52:16 AM PDT by HandBasketHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101

This has no chance of succeeding. Zero.

Rules are only for Republicans.


5 posted on 08/27/2021 9:53:40 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101

The worthless GOP needs to give it up. The next governor is the old governor.


6 posted on 08/27/2021 9:56:48 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101

Ironically, McAwful used the same tactics on Ralph Nader.


7 posted on 08/27/2021 9:58:18 AM PDT by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101

It’s true that - besides the missing signature - the entire document is fraudulent, because the “witnesses” falsely attested to witnessing him sign. Hard for the powers that be to “overlook”.


8 posted on 08/27/2021 10:06:42 AM PDT by LizzieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101

Omigosh. The GOPee is actually putting up a fight in Virginia!

I shall mark this moment down for when the Virginia GOPee returns to its usual Assistant Democrat position.


10 posted on 08/27/2021 10:16:32 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Florida: America's new free zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101

So the DMV will issue me a driver’s license if I don’t bother signing the paperwork?

No way they pull him from the race.


11 posted on 08/27/2021 10:26:02 AM PDT by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101
Call me jaded but these sorts of suits only work against republicans. Obama built his entire career on stuff like this. But I remember when US Senator Bob Torricelli (D) in NJ was caught red handed taking bribes (and the FBI deemed him resigning from the Senate as punishment enough for his many crimes and not charging him) right before an election.

The law was crystal clear, they were too close to substitute another name. There was a deadline in black and white in the law and it had past. Torricelli could stay on it if he wanted (he did not, presumably he'd have been prosecuted like a regular person if he tried to stay a Senator) but nobody else. Yet everyone knew Torricelli could not win and the republican would be elected. So the courts in NJ stepped in and said that NJ voters deserved to have a democrat nominee who would win and they set aside that law so demential addled former Senator Frank Lautenberg could be put on at the last second. And yeah, he won.

I expect every time a dem faces a question like this that the courts will preserve him regardless of what the law says. It just is one of those immutable facts of life now.

12 posted on 08/27/2021 10:33:45 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101

I wish someone would post the dates...

What was the last date he could apply to run...

What was the date the GOP discovered he had not signed thus completed the paperwork...


13 posted on 08/27/2021 10:42:04 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101

Silly rabbit, tricks are for commies!


15 posted on 08/27/2021 10:56:57 AM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101
It's kind of like Newsom in California forgetting to list his party affiliation.

The California courts ruled that he cannot add his party to the ballot listing.

-PJ

16 posted on 08/27/2021 10:57:47 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101

The two who signed as witnesses perpetrated a fraud on the Commonwealth of Virginia


18 posted on 08/27/2021 11:26:28 AM PDT by Bulwinkle (Bulwinkle, a.k.a. Daffy Duck )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FryingPan101

I looked at the form and the box for “Democrat primary” is checked, not the box for “General.” I suppose the argument must be that if he was not a lawful candidate in the primary then he couldn’t win the primary?

Does that mean the second place finisher in the Dem primary would become the candidate in the general election?

Or can the Dems declare McAuliffe the candidate in the absence of any other candidate?

The Republican lawsuit is unclear to me.


19 posted on 08/28/2021 8:37:45 PM PDT by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson