It’s true that - besides the missing signature - the entire document is fraudulent, because the “witnesses” falsely attested to witnessing him sign. Hard for the powers that be to “overlook”.
## It’s true that - besides the missing signature - the entire document is fraudulent, because the “witnesses” falsely attested to witnessing him sign. Hard for the powers that be to “overlook”.
You would think so. Kinda goes to the entire heart of the very concept of a Notary doesn’t it?