Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5G Health risks ignored. "...scientific misconduct".2020 NCBI
US National Library of Medicine ^ | 15JUL2020 | Lennart Hardell and Michael Carlbrrg

Posted on 08/19/2021 8:49:38 AM PDT by TianaHighrider

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405337/

Excerpt:

...The evaluation of RF radiation health risks from 5G technology is ignored in a report by a government expert group in Switzerland and a recent publication from The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Conflicts of interest and ties to the industry seem to have contributed to the biased reports. The lack of proper unbiased risk evaluation of the 5G technology places populations at risk. Furthermore, there seems to be a cartel of individuals monopolizing evaluation committees, thus reinforcing the no-risk paradigm. We believe that this activity should qualify as scientific misconduct.

(Excerpt) Read more at ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 5g; 5h; health; networking; vaccine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: Harpotoo

Laf. Yep. I rarely put up postings myself. But thout this was interesting. Now I understand why a lot of folks don’t. But it actually encourages me more! 😄


21 posted on 08/19/2021 10:33:10 AM PDT by TianaHighrider (God bless President Trump. Prayers for PDJT and his loyal supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Intar

No I do not trust the government. AND I found it extremely interesting a mountain of professionals published on a government site how the whole government approval process is COMPROMISED.


22 posted on 08/19/2021 10:37:05 AM PDT by TianaHighrider (God bless President Trump. Prayers for PDJT and his loyal supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Intar

Yep.

This is a “double face palm” moment for me every time it comes up...


23 posted on 08/19/2021 10:39:11 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

With the plan to install Harris quickly moving in (notice how all the controlled media turning on biden), I am wondering how all the dictates will be received.


24 posted on 08/19/2021 10:43:00 AM PDT by TianaHighrider (God bless President Trump. Prayers for PDJT and his loyal supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

The point of the article is the goverment comprised approval process.


25 posted on 08/19/2021 10:45:10 AM PDT by TianaHighrider (God bless President Trump. Prayers for PDJT and his loyal supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Dude who added 5h keyword wonder why searchy no worky


26 posted on 08/19/2021 10:48:38 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

” Conflicts of interest and ties to the industry seem to have contributed to the biased reports. The lack of proper unbiased risk evaluation of the 5G technology places populations at risk. Furthermore, there seems to be a cartel of individuals monopolizing evaluation committees, thus reinforcing the no-risk paradigm. We believe that this activity should qualify as scientific misconduct.”

Far as I can tell, neither you nor Intar are biologists, doctors, research scientists You both work in the industry being whose products are being investigated

I would be interested in any research regarding effects of microwave radiation, even low power radiation, on humans. When its done. You might be correct and the risk is minimal.


27 posted on 08/19/2021 11:00:56 AM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TianaHighrider

I’m forever banned on FB for putting up articles not towing the Fascist political/corporate line. You know what? I couldn’t be happier and realized all those folks I had as friends on FB really aren’t. They were just shadows from my past and really don’t partake in my present in any shape and or form.
Now it’s just really me and my REAL friends and family and realize how much time I wasted over the years bothering with virtual FB BS and company.


28 posted on 08/19/2021 11:17:18 AM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
The shortest 5G wavelength is 1000 times longer than UV, which is the longest wavelength of "ionizing radiation". The maximum power of a cell tower transmitter is 50 watts. There is no health danger from 5G.

You put a five watt transmitter to your ear.

29 posted on 08/19/2021 11:20:32 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Harpotoo

Thank you and big hugs too!


30 posted on 08/19/2021 11:26:11 AM PDT by TianaHighrider (God bless President Trump. Prayers for PDJT and his loyal supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TianaHighrider
The effects of radio at various frequencies has been known for a long time. 5G wavelengths are 1000 times longer than that of the lowest radiation that causes ionization. Cell towers transmit at a maximum of 50 watts. At your closest possible distance from such a tower, you are getting well below 1/1000 of a watt per square foot. You get 100 watts per square foot of sunlight, some of which is ionizing UV.

The sun is well known to cause damage to you. 5G is well known not to do so.

31 posted on 08/19/2021 11:27:46 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Nice info.
Still doesn’t address the compromised approval process that cherry picks results.


32 posted on 08/19/2021 11:32:40 AM PDT by TianaHighrider (God bless President Trump. Prayers for PDJT and his loyal supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Intar

Re: 7 - If I swallow a 5G phone, will I be harmed if an Incoming is received while the phone is in my stomach?


33 posted on 08/19/2021 11:36:21 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission
You know NOTHING about me. In fact, I am one of the engineers RESPONSIBLE for the safety of wireless emissions of my company's products. I calculate SAR and MPE, which are measures of tissue heating by RF radiation. And YES, I can provide EVIDENCE to you that 5G devices, on bands below 27 GHz, do NOT appreciably heat tissue. Ah, never mind, you wouldn't understand it anyway.

Also, if you knew ANYTHING about physics, you'd know that electromagnetic radiation below X-ray wavelengths is NOT ionizing radiation.

But I'm wasting keystrokes. You going to fear-monger, no matter what.

34 posted on 08/19/2021 11:36:55 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (But what do I know? I'm just a backwoods engineer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Intar

an Incoming CALL is received.


35 posted on 08/19/2021 11:37:01 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Yes.


36 posted on 08/19/2021 11:37:20 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (But what do I know? I'm just a backwoods engineer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
The power of the transmitter and your distance from it are the ONLY factors that determine a transmitter's danger to you. For longer wavelengths, your body is transparent. Shorter wavelengths heat the water in your body, causing thermal damage. An AM commercial transmitter will kill you if you are too close to the antenna, even though that is long wave.

Once the wavelength is short enough, we call it "infrared light"; and, it is no longer radio. Shorter wavelengths are known as "visible light", and then "ultraviolet" at even higher frequencies.

UV wavelengths are over 1000 times shorter than the shortest radio wavelengths. So, radio does not impinge upon molecules. Radio can only transfer heat into your body, which is quickly dissipated due to the very low power levels you are experiencing.

The maximum allowed power of a cell tower's transmitter is 50 watts. If we assume that 50 watts is the energy level at one foot, then at 1000ft the energy level per square foot would be 1/1,000,000 of a watt. No heat.

Now consider the sun. That baby gives you 100 watts per square foot at ground level, some of which IS ionizing UV. The sun is way more dangerous to you.

Even that five watt transmitter you stick up to your ear doesn't impart enough energy to you to case a temperature rise. No temperature rise, no ionizing radiation, no affect on your health.

37 posted on 08/19/2021 11:48:32 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TianaHighrider
still doesn’t address the compromised approval process that cherry picks results.

The approval process merely measures the wavelength of the radio energy and the power levels at various distances. Those are the only factors needed to guarantee human safety. The process was established by the IEEE organization in conjunction with medical research. I'm sure you can find approval records for any cell phone or tower.

No approval process was compromised. The knowledge base for radio energy safety is well established and widely distributed, and completely followed.

38 posted on 08/19/2021 11:55:36 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

The compromised approval process it talks about calls out distinctly “conflicts of interest”, “Cartels of individuals monopolizing evaluation committees”, and how the information cannot be trusted.

It is irrelevant that you support the 5G technology. It is the corruption of the process and possibilities it could pose problems being ignored that the article is about.


39 posted on 08/19/2021 12:15:12 PM PDT by TianaHighrider (God bless President Trump. Prayers for PDJT and his loyal supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TianaHighrider; Intar
...whole government approval process is COMPROMISED...

We engineers must submit working radio transceivers to two organizations for approval before manufacturing can begin. The Federal Communications Commission is one organization, which is government. The other is the Underwriters Laboratory, which is private. Both organizations test the equipment very carefully for a variety of things, including product safety. Neither organization misses any fault, and each pass through their labs cost a great deal of money. The final UL test totally destroys the device under test.

I can assure you, none of this is taken lightly and there is no way to circumvent it.

Just because one has a phd doesn't make one omniscient. My guess is that those raising the alarm are hunting government money to keep their research projects going. I say this because a great deal of research by cooperation between engineer phds and medical phds went into compiling the safety standards and rules.

40 posted on 08/19/2021 12:16:55 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson