Posted on 08/17/2021 8:20:03 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
This is a 5 part friendly debate between Dr. Vladimir "Zev" Zelenko, of Hydroxycholorquine fame and Dr. Jonathan Sarfati, of Creation Ministries International, Moderated by Trump's Election Lawyer, Jenna Ellis regarding the pros and cons of taking the Covid vaccines.
Dr. Zelenko takes the anti-vaccination stance while Dr. Sarfati takes the pro-vaccination stance.
Dr. Zelenko completed his family medicine residency at South Nassau Communities Hospital in Oceanside, N.Y. in May 2004. Since then, Dr. Zelenko has practiced family medicine in New York’s Hudson Valley. He has been described by his patients as a family member to thousands of families, and is a medical adviser to the volunteer ambulance corps in Kiryas Joel, New York.
In March 2020, Dr. Zelenko’s team was one of the first in the country to successfully treat thousands of Covid-19 patients in the prehospital setting. Dr. Zelenko developed his now famous “Zelenko Protocol,” which has saved countless lives worldwide, while he was fighting recurrent and metastatic sarcoma, had open heart surgery, and aggressive chemotherapy. He has also persevered against unrelenting defamation of character from the media, and threats against his person.
Dr. Zelenko is an observant orthodox Jew, married with 8 children, and has authored two books called Metamorphosis and Essence to Essence.
Dr. Jonathan Sarfati was Born in Ararat, Victoria. Sarfati moved with his family to New Zealand as a child, where he became a dual Australian and New Zealand citizen.
He attended Wellington College in New Zealand, later graduating from Victoria University of Wellington with a BSc (Hons.) in chemistry, and a PhD in the same subject for a thesis entitled "A Spectroscopic Study of some Chalcogenide Ring and Cage Molecules".
He co-authored a paper on high-temperature superconductors that was published in Nature in 1987 ("Letters to Nature"), and from 1988 to 1995, had five papers on spectroscopy of condensed matter samples published in other peer-reviewed scientific journals.
In 1996, he returned to Brisbane, Australia to work for the Creation Science Foundation, then Answers in Genesis, then its current name Creation Ministries International. In 2010, he moved to the American office of that ministry.
Sarfati was a founder of the Wellington Christian Apologetics Society in New Zealand, and has long retained an interest in Christian apologetics and the creation–evolution controversy. His first two books, Refuting Evolution in 1999, and Refuting Evolution 2 in 2002, are intended as rebuttals to the National Academy of Sciences' publication Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science and the PBS/Nova series Evolution, respectively.
Aside from being a Physical Chemist, Sarfati is a FIDE Master in chess, and achieved a draw against former world champion Boris Spassky during a tournament in Wellington in 1988, and was New Zealand's national chess champion in 1987–88.
He has given blindfold chess exhibitions at chess clubs and other events, and has played twelve such games simultaneously. His previous best was winning 11/11 at the Kapiti Chess Club in New Zealand.
Jenna Ellis is an American lawyer, known for her work as a member of Donald Trump's legal team. She is a former deputy district attorney in Weld County, Colorado and a former assistant professor of legal studies at Colorado Christian University.
As a private lawyer, she has litigated numerous cases in state courts. In 2015, she self-published The Legal Basis for a Moral Constitution , a book arguing that the Constitution of the United States can only be interpreted in accordance with the Bible.
Ellis was hired by Trump in November 2019 as a senior legal adviser. From November 2020 to January 2021, Ellis was part of the legal team conducting efforts to overturn Joe Biden's victory in the 2020 presidential election.
RE: Which one would you trust?
I found both debaters to be quite measured, even tempered and reasonable.
It’s the FACTS they present that need to be looked at.
They both present data. If the source they are relying their data on are unreliable, then their debating points go out the window.
Yes, I watch it but haven’t seen it on Pluto TV in recent days, and it appears they replaced it with another show.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.