Website Forced To Issue Major “Clarification” In Mike Lindell Hit Piece

Here’s a pretty interesting interview with Wiebe talking about Montegomery, along with election fraud more generally:
https://banned.video/watch?id=611f96b563db74600b02c158
Wiebe still very sharp, if you listen all the way through.

Wiebe is a retires NSA security analyst. He has a lot of good things to say about Dennis Montgomery, both personally and professionally. Of note is that Montgomery is under a gag order to not discuss things like election hacking. So, people are attacking a guy who isn't allowed to talk about what he knows. Most people would think that very unfair.

Yes. Lots of claims that Montgomery is a con man, etc., but our intel agencies also plant and fabricate evidence while going after those who know something that they might spill the beans on, so hard from afar to tell.

But I took Wiebe’s vouching for Dennis having worked on our agencies’ interception of foreign elections in that way (totally believable) much increases the chance that the tech was indeed used, as well as with the other, lower tech, election fraud. Also makes the motivation and sourcing to Lindell make more sense. I wasn’t aware that Montgomery was working a possible legal solution, perhaps before upping his directness of approach, if neither that nor anything else works.

But I took Wiebe’s vouching for Dennis having worked on our agencies’ interception of foreign elections in that way (totally believable) much increases the chance that the tech was indeed used, as well as with the other, lower tech, election fraud. Also makes the motivation and sourcing to Lindell make more sense. I wasn’t aware that Montgomery was working a possible legal solution, perhaps before upping his directness of approach, if neither that nor anything else works.

Hmmmm...Well if we had the ability to monitor foreign election returns over the Internet, and POTUS issued an EO to impose harsh sanctions if any foreign nation was involved in hacking our elections, then why is it so far fetched to think that someone in the U.S. government recorded the Internet data from the 2020 election?

What he actually said is that we were able to intercept Internet voting traffic and change elections in foreign countries that way—and that Montgomery had worked on such systems. There undoubtedly are intel community technologies to read Internet traffic in real time, if you know what you’re looking for. He also mentioned that the election tech that Montgomery had worked on wasn’t known to him with the names that have been reported (undoubtedly because those were products that Wiebe was involved with and of a different focus.

What he actually said is that we were able to intercept Internet voting traffic and change elections in foreign countries that way—and that Montgomery had worked on such systems. There undoubtedly are intel community technologies to read Internet traffic in real time, if you know what you’re looking for. He also mentioned that the election tech that Montgomery had worked on wasn’t known to him with the names that have been reported (undoubtedly because those were products that Wiebe was involved with and of a different focus.

This gets into how the globalists intervene in "friendly" nations to help their friends. Politicians routinely get around domestic surveillance laws by sharing spying on the domestic opposition with their foreign friends in reciprocal favors. So the U.K. can spy on people in the U.S., and the U.S. can spy on people in the U.K. Then they just share the intel with each other shamelessly. It wouldn't be at all surprising if they were doing similar things with election hacking. That could explain the Obama-Renzi connection and the allegations the 2020 election hacking was centered in Rome.

Actually no, he (Rob Graham) didn’t confirm that Lindell had 2020 election data. What’s not explicitly said in those Tweets of his is that he (Graham) made that coded data himself, from GA election data that’s public record. So it’s not part of the data that Lindell provided that’s the main point.

What he (Graham) showed was, given data that has no point of reference (data cryptographically coded as Lindell’s was, with a “key” that only that guy who had a stroke the night before the symposium apparently has, Dennis Montgomery), there’s no way to “dis-prove” that the data didn’t contain election data, because there’s no “key” to decrypt it in a way that is analyzable.

So yeah, Graham couldn’t “disprove” that there was election data in what was given because there’s no way to independently verify it without that decryption by Montgomery. Who strangely has been silent since then. Well I guess not “strangely” if he really did have a stroke (I feel bad for him I do, if that’s what happened). But just another “error” in this comedy of errors that seems to be anything audit/election related.

The main point to remember is, not whether or not something contained “election data”, it doesn’t matter if it did or didn’t, because “election data” by itself proves nothing. The PROOF, according to Lindell and his “red team” (before the syposium that is) was in the PCAPS that were going to “prove” that the data in the record was actually a hack from China or wherever. But again, those PCAPS, which were hyped for MONTHS, were NOT GIVEN. The last minute excuse was because of some “poison pill” somewhere in the data (that could potentially expose logon credentials like passwords and stuff of people). That’s not really a “poison pill” as Graham himself has explained in another Tweet by the way see here: https://twitter.com/ErrataRob/status/1425876826648240131 (#68 and 69). It was clearly a bait and switch at the end, either preciptated by Montgomery’s absence or maybe independent of it, doesn’t matter it’s clearly bait and switch when they realized “hey there really are experts here, dunno if this will hold much longer”. AT least that’s what it seems like to me. Again, I don’t think Lindell was involved, I think he’s just a sucker with a fat bank account that was taken for a ride.

See here for a good synopsis of where we are, in reality:

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/fivepoints/five-points-on-mike-lindells-dumpster-fire-cyber-symposium-election-fraud-event

By the way, I came to FR today to look for confirmation the AZ audit was delivered to the AZ Senate today, do you (or does anyone know) if it was? Looks like it wasn’t (I’m still looking), which again, that’s not a “shocker” really when you think about it. (still looking though, so maybe I’ll be wrong in my cynicism here....)