Replies

But I took Wiebe’s vouching for Dennis having worked on our agencies’ interception of foreign elections in that way (totally believable) much increases the chance that the tech was indeed used, as well as with the other, lower tech, election fraud. Also makes the motivation and sourcing to Lindell make more sense. I wasn’t aware that Montgomery was working a possible legal solution, perhaps before upping his directness of approach, if neither that nor anything else works.

Hmmmm...Well if we had the ability to monitor foreign election returns over the Internet, and POTUS issued an EO to impose harsh sanctions if any foreign nation was involved in hacking our elections, then why is it so far fetched to think that someone in the U.S. government recorded the Internet data from the 2020 election?

What he actually said is that we were able to intercept Internet voting traffic and change elections in foreign countries that way—and that Montgomery had worked on such systems. There undoubtedly are intel community technologies to read Internet traffic in real time, if you know what you’re looking for. He also mentioned that the election tech that Montgomery had worked on wasn’t known to him with the names that have been reported (undoubtedly because those were products that Wiebe was involved with and of a different focus.