'We made a big mistake’ — COVID Vaccine spike protein travels from injection site, can cause organ damage

nationaldailyng ^ | June 6, 2021 | Megan Redshaw

[RandFan]

COVID vaccine researchers had previously assumed mRNA COVID vaccines would behave like traditional vaccines. The vaccine’s spike protein — responsible for infection and its most severe symptoms — would remain mostly in the injection site at the shoulder muscle or local lymph nodes.

But new research obtained by a group of scientists contradicts that theory, a Canadian cancer vaccine researcher said last week.

“We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now,” said Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario. “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.”

[StolarStorm]

There is no way in hell I’m getting this “vaccine.”

[egfowler3]

And not just any “debunked” either, but the “... debunked by ‘experts’” kind of debunked!

s/ We must all bow down before the almighty, all knowing, all seeing Experts. /s

[Lean-Right]

House Atreides....where are you?
“Fear is the mind killer”!
Randfan...thanks for posting. Very
informative.

[kiryandil]

OK, Dr Bridle’s claims have been proven wrong by empirical science described by experts.

"experts"

     

[SoConPubbie]

Question has to be asked, of the doctors you have mentioned, how many have been corrupted by BIG PHARMA?

[olivia3boys]

I agree. A huge difference between over 50 and under 50. However now even the under 50s “need” the vaccine in CA to attend college or (now) to eat at a restaurant in LA. So there are now not only Heath considerations but also access considerations.

[SoConPubbie]

OK, Dr Bridle’s claims have been proven wrong by empirical science described by experts. Dr Bridle has no empirical science to back up his claims. To the circular file go his misinformation.

So you say.

As far as we know, the doctors you've mentioned, and you yourself, have no empirical science to back up your claims.

[enumerated]

“They absolutely are NOT going through enough testing.”

I agree that they were introduced way too soon without enough testing.

But what amount of testing over what period of time would have been “enough”? One year? Two years? 10 thousand test subjects?

My point is that however stupid it may have been to risk it, tens of millions of people have now taken the JJ vaccine starting as long as 6 months ago.

They can now be considered test subjects - and that is a LOT of testing.

We can watch them for a little while longer and consider the JJ vaccine well tested.

I haven’t been vaccinated - mostly because Covid doesn’t scare me at all. I don’t believe in getting vaccinated for something I’m not even worried about catching.

But if I had to - for whatever reason - I’d pick JJ because it’s a real vaccine and at this point with all the people that have already taken it (and not sprouted a third ear or anything) - I’d consider it well-tested.

[jonrick46]

The J and J vaccine uses the same technology as the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine which has been halted in the UK because of the risk of rare blood clots. Both vaccines use the viral vectored technology where a “harmless” adenovirus — from a large family of viruses, some of which cause common colds — has been engineered to carry the genetic code for the SARS-2 spike protein.

The Swine Flu vaccine uses a weakened form of the virus grown in fertilized chicken eggs. From what I understand, that egg material has caused allergic side effects, like Guillain-Barre syndromme.

[SoConPubbie]

But what amount of testing over what period of time would have been “enough”? One year? Two years? 10 thousand test subjects?

The same standard testing, 10-15 years, that each and every other vaccine goes through.

On the other side of the equation, just as with other vaccines, when the death count from the vaccines started climbing, the vaccines should have been pulled.

Instead, even after the death count for these current COVID-19 vaccines far exceeded the death count for all other record vaccine events in the history of VAERS, they doubled-down and kept lying about everything about these Vaccines.

[foundedonpurpose]

I’ll pass. This show is just beginning.

[jonrick46]

When you try to discredit the peer reviewed empirical knowledge of scientist because of an assumed bias by Big Pharm, you will need to back up your assumption with facts. Come on, lets get real!

[SoConPubbie]

When you try to discredit the peer reviewed empirical knowledge of scientist because of an assumed bias by Big Pharm, you will need to back up your assumption with facts. Come on, lets get real!

Sorry, but when you ignore the fact that these vaccines are killing people at a rate higher than every other vaccine in the history of VAERS and combine that fact with the fact that historically, only 1% to 5% of actual adverse events get reported to the Voluntary VAERS system, which means somewhere north of probably 100,000 people have died from these vaccines I don't need to try and discredit anything.

The performance of the vaccines themselves discredits the vaccines.

[Gene Eric]

I’m aware of the coercion, and it certainly complicates things for so many.

[jonrick46]

"Voluntary VAERS system, which means somewhere north of probably 100,000 people have died from these vaccines."

Those who use VAERS statistics to determine real side effects do not understand they are dealing with raw data. The actual cause of the deaths/side effects has not been investigated. A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.

[greeneyes]

And not just any “debunked” either, but the “... debunked by ‘experts’” kind of debunked!

s/ We must all bow down before the almighty, all knowing, all seeing Experts. /s
*******************************************************************************
So an appeal to authority, but no citing of actual scientific studies that we can review. I put that about even with Fauci says.

[exnavy]

One might survive the virus, i did. The vaxx will kill you, 1 year, 5 years, we do not know when. The vaxx is pure poison.

[napscoordinator]

The problem I have is that people take as gospel all the death numbers from the ones getting the vaccines, but shun the death numbers from corona otherwise. I don’t see how you can have it both ways.

[napscoordinator]

We have no idea what the future holds for those that had corona. Your future may be bleak as corona wreaks havoc on your body in the future. No studies have figured out long term affects of having corona. Of course I wish you luck and nothing happens.

[enumerated]

“The same standard testing, 10-15 years, that each and every other vaccine goes through.”

I didn’t realize it was that long .. point well taken