Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pratt & Whitney Outlines Vision for Renewing the B-52
Air Force Magazine ^ | 5 Aug 2021

Posted on 08/06/2021 9:04:22 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT

The Air Force has set an ambitious goal for the B-52 Stratofortress: Update the aircraft for the modern battlefield so the legendary bomber can continue flying combat missions at least 100 years after its first flight.

Re-engining the venerable B-52 Stratofortress could keep the legendary bomber flying into the 2060s, and possibly beyond. New engines, such as Pratt & Whitney's PW800 commercial engine, promise greater reliability, fuel efficiency, and power.

Today’s B-52 is a lot like the one Air Force Maj. Gen. Andrew J. Gebara, the director of strategic plans at the Air Force Global Strike Command, piloted early in his career. But once new engines are on board it will be “a very different B-52 than what I flew as a lieutenant.”

(Excerpt) Read more at airforcemag.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: b52
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Mogger

This is also assuming that an aircraft like the B-52 will even have a role in future conflicts.


21 posted on 08/06/2021 9:49:30 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

“Those airframes have got to be fatigued.”

The Air Force brings them to Kelly Air Force Base in San Antonio for Air Frame maintenance. Fatigued parts are removed and replaced.


22 posted on 08/06/2021 9:51:56 AM PDT by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, roughneck, geologist, consultant, pilot instructor, pharmacist , retired now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Since when was Briggs & Stratton in this business!


23 posted on 08/06/2021 9:56:38 AM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

100 years: Big Ugly Senile Plane.


24 posted on 08/06/2021 10:04:03 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mogger

“This is assuming there will be a USA in 2060”

China will be around, for sure. Russia will, if they can maintain a credible threat against China, given Russia’s huge nuke arsenal, and despite a declining number of Russians. Japan, maybe, if they can hold off China - but that gets harder year-by-year. Western Europe will be long dead, US will also be dead, although will hold out a bit longer than Western Europe. Eastern Europe will survive, providing they’re willing to join Russia in an alliance.


25 posted on 08/06/2021 10:10:05 AM PDT by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

—” Big Ugly Senile Plane.”

Function over form.
Considering the age and the designers/engineers probably used wood slide rules! Adds luster to a work of art.

Not ugly in my view.


26 posted on 08/06/2021 10:15:52 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (("The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!"Dien Bien Phu last message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BobL

—”Eastern Europe will survive, providing they’re willing to join Russia in an alliance.”

A sharp old friend has maintained for over 50 years, when it comes it will be USA and Russia against China.

Mostly for reasons of religion and race.

???


27 posted on 08/06/2021 10:19:49 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (("The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!"Dien Bien Phu last message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Russia was saying the same to us back during the Cold War: “You know, it’s the Chinese we all have to really worry about”. We all laughed...back then.


28 posted on 08/06/2021 10:21:39 AM PDT by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The tooling to build a new B-52 don’t exist any more, just like the F-22.
The process tooling up a production line would be almost as bad designing and building a brand new bomber.


29 posted on 08/06/2021 10:36:51 AM PDT by Little Ray (Civilization runs on a narrow margin. What sustains it is not magic, but hard work. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BobL

For many years I disagreed with my friend on this topic.

Now I see a push to remove religion from the USA.

Gotta have a “New Man” and the old religion will not work.

“I say, beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes. If there is not a new man, how can the new clothes be made to fit?”
Said a very early hippy.
Henry David Thoreau,


30 posted on 08/06/2021 10:38:12 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (("The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!"Dien Bien Phu last message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BiglyCommentary

Robust and well engineered to begin with, surviving B-52 airframes have also benefitted from upgrades and repairs intended to extend service life by replacing fatigued structural elements and worn out components. The cost benefit case for doing so is compelling due to the B-52’s low operating costs.


31 posted on 08/06/2021 10:44:49 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

I wonder what percentage of the airframe is original?


32 posted on 08/06/2021 10:49:49 AM PDT by Ben Dover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PUGACHEV

“bundles of wires with cloth covering”

That’s not exactly cloth. Has to do with EMP sheilding.


33 posted on 08/06/2021 10:51:04 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

I’ve always seen that about the buff. It would cost less to build a new one. The new designs are with just 4 engines. Wait around long enough and they’ll only need two.


34 posted on 08/06/2021 10:54:35 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

“Considering the age and the designers/engineers probably used wood slide rules!”

While the designers of the way over budget F-35 had all the computing power they could ask for.
Give me a William Boeing or Donald Douglas and a bunch of slide rule engineers who love their work any day.
It ain’t enough to know the theory, ya gotta be able to work the problem...on PAPER, WITH A PENCIL.


35 posted on 08/06/2021 10:58:09 AM PDT by oldvirginian (I’m getting tired of being part of a major historical event.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Can you imagine how that would go? By the time the AF generals got their say-so, then the house and senate to approve the funding, it would cost 10’s of billion$ per plane and then they would scrap it because it wasn’t all electric to meet the green goals of Congress


36 posted on 08/06/2021 10:59:38 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii; DUMBGRUNT

Do they have to disassemble the entire plane to get to the frame?


37 posted on 08/06/2021 11:33:17 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I wish they would build some new ones.

I find the B-52s very attractive.

And no, I'm not talking about a dance band out of Athens, GA.


38 posted on 08/06/2021 11:42:20 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (Give me a Pigfoot and a Bottle of Beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

8^)

5.56mm


39 posted on 08/06/2021 11:43:17 AM PDT by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho need to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BobL

cmon

soviet diversion/deflection is just that

shoulda let patton dealmwith soviets then

and then dealt with china


40 posted on 08/06/2021 11:54:24 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson