Posted on 08/01/2021 2:04:58 AM PDT by RandFan
@RepThomasMassie
Question for folks planning to take the third shot soon:
Do you hope the third shot conveys semi-permanent immunity or
Do you believe you’ll need to get a shot every 6 months or
Do you believe we can eradicate this corona virus?
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Are you willing to gamble your health on a vax that is experimental, EUA with out FDA approval? Especially since there are other treatments which have been out there for many years!
I KNOW! I have a hard time wrapping my head around that. You put it perfectly: Cognitive dissonance.
The COVID “vaccine” is not the Polio vaccine. It is a shoddy, leaky Marek’s disease vaccine. It will only make the virus stronger until “vaccination” is necessary for life, just like Marek’s in poultry.
The “vaccine” is given to you by the same people (if you want to call them that) who gave you the virus.
I’ll let you figure out motive.
That’s why the coronavirus itself was created in the first place. The “vaccine” was created to clean it up and probably was already in existence back in March 2020 when everything first got rolling. At the same time, I’m not going to not take the vaccine and potentially put myself at greater risk of dying if I get the coronavirus. I’m over 40 and not a model of perfect health. Did I do it out of fear? Sure. It just is what it is.
There is great danger from badly utilized antibiotics. There is the same danger from this shoddy “vaccine”.
The percentages you offer are meaningless. Americans can live their lives in the near certainty that they will NEVER contract Polio. That will NEVER be the case with this virus and “vaccine”. To pretend that they have the same ends is dishonest.
How’s the Kool Aid taste?
Our immune systems got us through the worst cases of flu of the past. The current “Rona” has to be continually fed to keep the fear and fright alive.
You mean that, after the injections, your immune system didn't react?! It wasn't "triggered?" It didn't mount a defense against the (apparent) attack?
That's odd!
Regards,
Establishment Medicine and big pharma are TOTALLY CORRUPTED by MONEY! It is always perpetual symptom treatment or some obscenely costly treatment, because that produces the most money. AVOID. It does take knowledge and work but the rewards are fantastic.
The probability of you surviving C19 is app 99%. These odds are reduced to 98.76843% if you smoke, drink, are tall, speak English, have a comorbidity, or kick your dog.
What money? Yuan? There won’t be a Dollar by the time this is through.
This is a Government Virus from a Government Lab. Raise your sights, a little.
I was about to ask you that. The facts are against your case. So I ask YOU, how do you like chugging down the pool aid?
The CCCP aren’t that competent
That’s 3 questions you Commie/democrat paid shill
Not guessing.
Thanks for this. Inside the text is reference to the Declaration of Helsinki, which is also relevant>
In other words, what we are going through is massive human experimentation now arriving at the point of compulsion. Most people, who couldn’t name 3 justices on the US Supreme Court, gave into receiving the vax under coercion due to fear propagated in the media and/or not asking for/receiving sufficient information to truly make informed consent. It doesn’t help that the givernmint is using its proxies in big tech and the media to censor information. CCP is given a pass for what they did to the world.
“Why is the “scientific” world only focusing on the vaccines and not the therapeutics to treat Covid?”
Israel is testing two therapeutics both antivirals and a preventative nasal spray. Pfizer USA is in phase 1 of an anti viral like tamaflu for COVID in the USA. Contrary to the internet bloggers HQC never showed peer reviewed two sigma results indicating that is was anything near a “cure” same for the horse wormer neither has shown medically proven results enough to call them a cure. There has been some anecdotal correlations but no where near the R^2=0.95 of valid double blind peer reviewed research. I’m sure the shrills will.show up pimpin both at some point ask them to point to a Lancet or.Johns Hopkins study backing up the dribble they won’t have such because there is no science to support it.
“they won’t have such because there is no science to support it.”
Do you beleive the official 2020 election numbers? If not, please verify your belief by pointing to a reputable major news source that supports your belief.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.