Deadly Blood Clots Develop In 62% of People Receiving COVID Vaccine [35 minute Video and 15 minutes transcribed into notes]

Respected international organizations of doctors, physicians, scientists, epidemiologists, virologists, you name it, have formed in the last year and a half all over the world, and they have been reviewing studies going back decades, and current studies, where it was conclusively known in the literature at prestigious FACILITIES like the University of Texas Level 4 Lab in Galveston Texas, by 2012, that if you try to create a vaccine for the protein shell of a corona virus it makes the body attack the lung, brain and heart and create billions of tiny micro blood clots that then start forming larger blood clots.

And what’s incredible now is, prestigious respected doctors and scientists, and doctors that head up major ER’s in Canada and others, are seeing in their patients that have been injected with these experimental shots, the exact same thing happening.

SNIP I’m going to get to this report and then I’m going to go through some of the background and show you some of the studies.

But first, do you know who funded the major 3-year study at the University of Texas, Galveston? Whose name is on the top of it? Anthony Fauci.

And when they came back to him testing 3 vaccines that would then attack that protein in the Corona SARS family, same as Covid-19, they said, ‘Proceed with extreme caution. Do not make a human vaccine out of this.’ It actually says that.

Now it turns out there are hundreds of prominent studies in the British Medical Journal, in the New England Medical Journal, and others that knew this, and all these other prestigious scientists like Dr. Yeadon, the former Chief Scientist At Pfizer, and Wolfgang Woodarg and others went public before this started a year ago and put out an emergency injunction to the EU saying, 'this is going to happen, blood clots' and they still ignored it. And then you saw the blood clots and the death.

They keep saying 'it's rare, it's rare, it's rare' when your mom, your dad, your neighbor, your son, your daughter or you get really sick or die from it. but it's not.

In the studies of rats, and in the studies of ferrets or other animals. The vast majority of them developed blood clots and then died within a few months. In humans they estimate it will take a few years because we are a lot tougher.

But it gets worse. Dr. Charles Hoffe, very respected, over a whole hospital facility, and has a whole bunch of his own private patients, has been having his patients going that have been given the Moderna, Pfizer or other injections, and they are finding exactly what is in the UT studies, the British studies and others with the blood clots. So many of them, it's just incredible.

So here's a 9 minute report of him on a doctor's round table report, and remember this is being suppressed on Twitter and Face Book.

People with medical degrees, with studies, with science. And then if you question it, Fauci and the media say that were murderers for simply questioning the fact that they are pushing an experimental shot on us.

So watch this report, write this information down. And while he's speaking we're going to be putting on screen some of the main line studies, again from top of the line facilities, that found exactly what he's seeing in his patients, and they're finding this in other hospitals and clinics all over the world.

But they're trying to then gaslight everyone and say , 'you can't question it, and you must take it, and you must have this vaccine passport which is the end game of the global ID, and a social credit score, and they're now going to have carbon credits to track your carbon use, and have a global tax. Klaus Schwab has said that. So they using the fear of the virus to get that global ID, but at the same time to also start depopulating.

So here is Dr. Hoffe, laying it out, and then we've got more information that backs this up and explains why they're doing it.

Doctors were originally told that the vaccine contents stay in the injected arm and do not become intravenious. They now know that only 25% of the vaccine remains in the arm. The other 75% of the mRNA which are molecules (strands) wrapped in lipid capsules, spread out through the body through the circulatory system.

The nanocapsules containing trillions of mRNA molecules are absorbed into the lining of the capillaries and then spike proteins are generated. The spike proteins are embedded in the lining of the cell. The lining of these cells should be very smooth to allow unimpeded blood flow.

But the embedded spike proteins make the lining of the capillaries very rough, like sand paper. Clotting is inevitable because platelets flowing through these roughened capillaries interpret rough spots as damaged vessels and the platlets assume 'this must be a damaged vessel, this vessel needs to be blocked to stop the bleeding.' That's how clotting works.

Because of these spike proteins in the capillary networks, clotting is inevitable. Scans will not reveal these minute clots. The only way to find recent clots is with the D-Dimer test. That test will not reveal old clots, it shows up in new clots. It doesn't tell you where the clot is; it just tells you that the clotting mechanism has been activated.

So he's been recruiting his own patients and others that have heard him speak about this, and he's asked people to have the D-Dimer test within one week of their Covid vaccine injection. Of preliminary results so far, because the study is ongoing, 62% are positive for elevated D-Dimer which means these blood clots following vaccination are not rare, despite what the experts keep telling us. The big clots are rare, but the small ones are clearly happening in the majority of people (62%)

The real concern is, a clotted vessel is permanently damaged, that vessel never ever goes back to normal, so if this theory is correct, which it really looks like by these D-Dimer results, and I'm told it's been done in Australia and the UK which also found elevated D-Dimer. Those countries discarded that information because there was no clinical evidence, but that's because these clots are microscopic and scattered, you're not going to see clinical evidence.

But in fact all of the frequent side effects of the shots, (headache, nausea, dizziness, fatigue) could all be signs of cerebral thrombosis on a capillary level. You could be having thousands and thousands of tiny tiny little clots in your brain, that won't show on a scan, but they will give you those exact symptoms.

He now has 6 people in his medical practice that cannot exert themselves the way they used to, which is called 'reduced effort tolerance'. 6 people who now get out of breath when they do things they could previously do without any problem.

He beleives these people blocked up thousands and thousands of tiny capillaries in their lungs. He believes they have permanently damaged lungs and that's why they get out of breath. (gives an example of effort tolerance reduced to 1/8 of original).

He's sent some of these people for chest x-rays and CT scans - all it shows is distorted architecture (radiologists describe it as 'increased reticulation), a very non-specific thing and it's because it's microscopic.

The concern is, because these vessels are permanently damaged in a person's lungs, when the hear tries to pump blood through all those damaged vessels, there is increased resistance trying to pump the blood through those lungs, so those people are going to develop something called pulmonary artery hypertension, high blood pressure in their lungs.

And the concern with that is those people will probably develop right-sided heart failure within 3 years and die because they now have increased vascular resistance through their lungs. And lung tissue and heart tissue and brain and spinal - all that does not regenerate. Other tissues can regenerate - liver, kidneys and muscle, but some tissues cannot.

So that's absolutely explains what I'm seeing in my patients and that's what I'm doing to prove it in my studies, which are ongoing.

Alex Jones: It's settled science. The spike proteins are actually causing all the damage we're hearing about and that's what all these scientists said they would do before the vaccines came out.

Now they put advisories on all these vaccines, that they can cause blood clots, that they can cause strokes, they can cause heart attacks. In much of the world, these experimental shots are banned. Did you know that less than 10% of India is vaccinated right now? They are refusing to take this.

Dr. Lee Merrit of America's Front Line Doctors, one of the best organizations out there fighting this tyranny, came out in a long report that's on Infowars.com and she laid out how this is unrestricted warfare by the big banks and the central cartels to destroy the real economy, collapse the 3rd world, and knock out all their competition in the Western world, taking out all the small businesses that they call non-essential.

Once those small businesses have collapsed, and the infrastructure is gone for a few years, then they can give us all universal basic income, but with that will come the strings attached: we've got to take the injections, accept the carbon passports they say they're giving us, and we have to go under this serious, neo-feudalistic control system.

That's what the following 2 minute consortium is about. The full report is at InfoWars.com. I suggest you get it and you share it. This is Dr. Lee Merrit explaining, this is 21st century, 5th generational, unrestricted warfare.

ransomnote: There's another 20 minutes to the video. I will stop recoding notes here other than a few things I noticed before stopping the video.

I note that Jones says Ted Turner put up the Georgia Guidestones - that's the first time I've heard that assertion. The target for Eugencists is a total world population of 500 million and that number is recorded on the Georgia Guidstones.

Assertions that the unvaccinated (FAUCI clip) are to blame for variants are false, and is in fact the result of the vaccine program.

ransomnote: As I said, it looks interesting so I will plan on watching the remainder later.

>> autopsies

In general, the medical community denied therapeutics, collectively blew out the lungs, registered virtually every death as Covid-19, adhered to the Pharma/science narrative.

I wouldn’t expect an accurate disclosure of the clotting factors.

Thanks for the ping. In addition to this Publication, (posted again below for reference)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/

Early on in 2020, I also read a study from several years back of the initial SARS and the conclusion stated that since vaccines were not available and unlikely to be possible, the wisdom of continuing such studies was questionable.

I had that study marked, but my computer crashed, and I was not able to retrieve those files.

what is 62% figure based on? What did I overlook?
***************************************************************************************

The 62% is based on that Doctors patients. He is doing a study and has them take the D-Dimer test a week after the injection.

So far, 62% of those tested have D-Dimer results that they have clots, but they are too small to show up on CT scans etc.

And their symptoms are also consistent with having micro-clots which are most likely blocking very small vessels called capillaries.

The problem with animal testing is that humans don’t necessarily react to things the same way that animals do
*****************************************************************************
Yes, this is true. However, in general they also do studies first to show whether a particular species would be a good stand in for people.

In addition, they sometimes insert genes into those animals to make it even more so. Ferrets and Mice are some of the ones that I recall they established through studies that could be used.

I am sure, though that each expert has an opinion on which animal is the best to use for these type of experiments.

”62% are positive for elevated D-Dimer which means these blood clots following vaccination are not rare, despite what the experts keep telling us. The big clots are rare, but the small ones are clearly happening in the majority of people (62%).”

Survival of the fittest just took a man-made detour.

Autopsies - these people are not dead, so no they didn’t do autopsies.

They had symptoms consistent with microscopic clots in small blood vessels/capillaries and the D-Dimer was used to see if there were new clots within a week of the vaccine. There were.

More data is being collected, and sooner or later the good Doctor’s theory will either be more fully supported or not.

It was perfect timing for them to push this RNA experiment - if it works, they are heroes, if it fails they get to blame their latest “literal Hitler” for it.
*********************************************************************************

winner winner chicken dinner. Ya got it right for sure.

It’s an inaccurate title for the video. It gives the impression that 62% of ALL people receiving the COVID-19 vaccine develop blood clots.

Whoever titled the video was intellectually lazy.

Thank you for doing the work to get this truth out. The great reset has a tagalong of mass murder on a scale never iagined in History of humanity. Albeit a slow death program, meant to hide the truth that the killing was planned and instituted under the guise of saving us from a nearly innocuous virus released upon the world. The proof of this planned murdering is the strenuous effort and media propaganda to prevent people from using HCQ and or Ivermectin to treat the virus early and successfully. The murdering uses the jabs (these are not vacines), knowing the killing will be distributed over a time span which gives ‘plausible deniability’ via media propaganda.

"What a load of blithering nonsense. If this were true, nearly 64% the people I work with would be dead or have been hospitalized. I myself wouldn’t be around to make this reply." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What we know from your statement is that it has affected your ability to read or reason since any damage would not be evident in every case until sometime in the future! (I assume by your statement that 64% of your co-workers have received one of the vaccines.) Snip "The concern is, because these vessels are permanently damaged in a person's lungs, when the hear tries to pump blood through all those damaged vessels, there is increased resistance trying to pump the blood through those lungs, so those people are going to develop something called pulmonary artery hypertension, high blood pressure in their lungs. And the concern with that is those people will probably develop right-sided heart failure within 3 years and die because they now have increased vascular resistance through their lungs. And lung tissue and heart tissue and brain and spinal - all that does not regenerate. Other tissues can regenerate - liver, kidneys and muscle, but some tissues cannot." What is nonsense is to knowingly take a vaccine that has not been thoroughly tested.

Its true, I got the Vaccine, and died from blood clots. Like half the people I know who got the Vaccine died from blood clots.

And (Shucks!) the angels sent you back to learn how to read! (Future effect not present death!)

The D-dimer tests were to be done within one week of vaccination. D-dimer doesn’t show old clots, only new. So if a person has a d-dimer test a couple months after a vaccination would microclots from the vaccination be too old to show up? Is there a time window beyond which it is too late to document the presence of microclots from the vaccine?
~~~~~~~~~~
Likely too late, as other factors cause clots too. Even those getting the d-dimer test within a week haven’t proven that their clots are not caused by something else, it’s the sheer number of them occurring within one week compared with a control group (how many positive D-Dimer tests are ‘normal’ for a non-vaccinated group) that provides evidence it’s the shot.
But, I have no medical background so that’s just a guess. Also, this line of reasoning you’re following may be just the start of many people having the same thought, so perhaps many people getting a D-Dimer a couple of months after the shot could then be compared with a control group tested a couple of months after the shot.

The more data, the better support. It would need to be more people.

The clotting phenonomenon is not on a clockwork, like withing a day or two all the clotting that will occur occurs then no more. The potential for clotting caused by the jabs is spread out over a timeline stretching to perhaps two yeqars from first jab. And every jab thereafter adds to the timeline as well as stimulating immediate reactions. The murder method is sort of like poisoning with arsenic, there is a cumulative effect if a massive dose is not used but instead a steady infusion of small amounts of the poison. Some folks are more sensitive and susceptible, others collapse after an accumulation of microscopic clots.

So if 62% of the people receiving vaccines died of blood clots then how did we miss that?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Did you read the notes I placed at the top of the thread? The text explains that 62% of people test positive with a D-Dimer test within 7 days of vaccination. He tried using scans and chest x-rays to detect clots in those people but the clots are very tiny and scattered throughout the body so they don’t turn up on scans/x-rays. Yet the D-Dimer test shows clotting is occurring.

With thousands of microclots accumulating in locations like the lungs, cardio hypertension results (takes more effort to pump blood past clotted capillaries). The required level of effort to pump blood damages the heart - he expects cardiac function to fail, at this rate, in around 2-3 years.

SO the ‘vaccines’ are setting a course for heart damage, the initiation of which can be detected with the d-dimer within one week of ‘vaccination.’

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.