Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

The D-dimer tests were to be done within one week of vaccination. D-dimer doesn’t show old clots, only new. So if a person has a d-dimer test a couple months after a vaccination would microclots from the vaccination be too old to show up? Is there a time window beyond which it is too late to document the presence of microclots from the vaccine?


57 posted on 07/26/2021 12:55:02 PM PDT by rx (Truth will out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rx

The D-dimer tests were to be done within one week of vaccination. D-dimer doesn’t show old clots, only new. So if a person has a d-dimer test a couple months after a vaccination would microclots from the vaccination be too old to show up? Is there a time window beyond which it is too late to document the presence of microclots from the vaccine?
~~~~~~~~~~
Likely too late, as other factors cause clots too. Even those getting the d-dimer test within a week haven’t proven that their clots are not caused by something else, it’s the sheer number of them occurring within one week compared with a control group (how many positive D-Dimer tests are ‘normal’ for a non-vaccinated group) that provides evidence it’s the shot.
But, I have no medical background so that’s just a guess. Also, this line of reasoning you’re following may be just the start of many people having the same thought, so perhaps many people getting a D-Dimer a couple of months after the shot could then be compared with a control group tested a couple of months after the shot.

The more data, the better support. It would need to be more people.


58 posted on 07/26/2021 1:25:07 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: rx

The clotting phenonomenon is not on a clockwork, like withing a day or two all the clotting that will occur occurs then no more. The potential for clotting caused by the jabs is spread out over a timeline stretching to perhaps two yeqars from first jab. And every jab thereafter adds to the timeline as well as stimulating immediate reactions. The murder method is sort of like poisoning with arsenic, there is a cumulative effect if a massive dose is not used but instead a steady infusion of small amounts of the poison. Some folks are more sensitive and susceptible, others collapse after an accumulation of microscopic clots.


59 posted on 07/26/2021 1:29:20 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson