Posted on 07/26/2021 6:46:05 AM PDT by ransomnote
>> autopsies
In general, the medical community denied therapeutics, collectively blew out the lungs, registered virtually every death as Covid-19, adhered to the Pharma/science narrative.
I wouldn’t expect an accurate disclosure of the clotting factors.
Thanks for the ping. In addition to this Publication, (posted again below for reference)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/
Early on in 2020, I also read a study from several years back of the initial SARS and the conclusion stated that since vaccines were not available and unlikely to be possible, the wisdom of continuing such studies was questionable.
I had that study marked, but my computer crashed, and I was not able to retrieve those files.
what is 62% figure based on? What did I overlook?
***************************************************************************************
The 62% is based on that Doctors patients. He is doing a study and has them take the D-Dimer test a week after the injection.
So far, 62% of those tested have D-Dimer results that they have clots, but they are too small to show up on CT scans etc.
And their symptoms are also consistent with having micro-clots which are most likely blocking very small vessels called capillaries.
The problem with animal testing is that humans don’t necessarily react to things the same way that animals do
*****************************************************************************
Yes, this is true. However, in general they also do studies first to show whether a particular species would be a good stand in for people.
In addition, they sometimes insert genes into those animals to make it even more so. Ferrets and Mice are some of the ones that I recall they established through studies that could be used.
I am sure, though that each expert has an opinion on which animal is the best to use for these type of experiments.
Survival of the fittest just took a man-made detour.
Autopsies - these people are not dead, so no they didn’t do autopsies.
They had symptoms consistent with microscopic clots in small blood vessels/capillaries and the D-Dimer was used to see if there were new clots within a week of the vaccine. There were.
More data is being collected, and sooner or later the good Doctor’s theory will either be more fully supported or not.
It was perfect timing for them to push this RNA experiment - if it works, they are heroes, if it fails they get to blame their latest “literal Hitler” for it.
*********************************************************************************
winner winner chicken dinner. Ya got it right for sure.
It’s an inaccurate title for the video. It gives the impression that 62% of ALL people receiving the COVID-19 vaccine develop blood clots.
Whoever titled the video was intellectually lazy.
Except he does not know that. At all.
Thank you for doing the work to get this truth out. The great reset has a tagalong of mass murder on a scale never iagined in History of humanity. Albeit a slow death program, meant to hide the truth that the killing was planned and instituted under the guise of saving us from a nearly innocuous virus released upon the world. The proof of this planned murdering is the strenuous effort and media propaganda to prevent people from using HCQ and or Ivermectin to treat the virus early and successfully. The murdering uses the jabs (these are not vacines), knowing the killing will be distributed over a time span which gives ‘plausible deniability’ via media propaganda.
Left the “Sarc” tag off your little fiction!
So if 62% of the people receiving vaccines died of blood clots then how did we miss that?
Its true, I got the Vaccine, and died from blood clots. Like half the people I know who got the Vaccine died from blood clots.
And (Shucks!) the angels sent you back to learn how to read! (Future effect not present death!)
There are bloody clots all up and down my street. Oh the humanity.
The D-dimer tests were to be done within one week of vaccination. D-dimer doesn’t show old clots, only new. So if a person has a d-dimer test a couple months after a vaccination would microclots from the vaccination be too old to show up? Is there a time window beyond which it is too late to document the presence of microclots from the vaccine?
The D-dimer tests were to be done within one week of vaccination. D-dimer doesn’t show old clots, only new. So if a person has a d-dimer test a couple months after a vaccination would microclots from the vaccination be too old to show up? Is there a time window beyond which it is too late to document the presence of microclots from the vaccine?
~~~~~~~~~~
Likely too late, as other factors cause clots too. Even those getting the d-dimer test within a week haven’t proven that their clots are not caused by something else, it’s the sheer number of them occurring within one week compared with a control group (how many positive D-Dimer tests are ‘normal’ for a non-vaccinated group) that provides evidence it’s the shot.
But, I have no medical background so that’s just a guess. Also, this line of reasoning you’re following may be just the start of many people having the same thought, so perhaps many people getting a D-Dimer a couple of months after the shot could then be compared with a control group tested a couple of months after the shot.
The more data, the better support. It would need to be more people.
The clotting phenonomenon is not on a clockwork, like withing a day or two all the clotting that will occur occurs then no more. The potential for clotting caused by the jabs is spread out over a timeline stretching to perhaps two yeqars from first jab. And every jab thereafter adds to the timeline as well as stimulating immediate reactions. The murder method is sort of like poisoning with arsenic, there is a cumulative effect if a massive dose is not used but instead a steady infusion of small amounts of the poison. Some folks are more sensitive and susceptible, others collapse after an accumulation of microscopic clots.
So if 62% of the people receiving vaccines died of blood clots then how did we miss that?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did you read the notes I placed at the top of the thread? The text explains that 62% of people test positive with a D-Dimer test within 7 days of vaccination. He tried using scans and chest x-rays to detect clots in those people but the clots are very tiny and scattered throughout the body so they don’t turn up on scans/x-rays. Yet the D-Dimer test shows clotting is occurring.
With thousands of microclots accumulating in locations like the lungs, cardio hypertension results (takes more effort to pump blood past clotted capillaries). The required level of effort to pump blood damages the heart - he expects cardiac function to fail, at this rate, in around 2-3 years.
SO the ‘vaccines’ are setting a course for heart damage, the initiation of which can be detected with the d-dimer within one week of ‘vaccination.’
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.