Posted on 07/19/2021 7:02:43 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
In an interview with a Candian broadcaster on 28 May 2021, Dr Byram Bridle — a viral immunologist at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada—claimed the spike protein generated by the Covid-19 is capable of damaging the cardiovascular system.
But the claim is based on assumptions not supported by evidence.
As we have written before, there is a protein on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (the virus which causes Covid-19), called a spike protein. This spike protein helps the virus enter cells and is also one of the ways the human body’s immune cells recognise a virus and attack it.
The Covid-19 vaccines approved for use in the UK work by giving the body instructions on how to make the spike protein, so that if the person is later infected, their immune system can generate a response that attacks the virus (via the spike protein) faster and more effectively.
Dr Bridle’s concern rests on two claims. Firstly, that the spike proteins generated by the vaccine cause cardiovascular damage if they get into the bloodstream. Secondly, that the spike protein produced by the vaccine does not just act locally, at the site of the jab, but gets into the bloodstream and is carried to many other sites in the body.
Scientists who reviewed Dr Bridle’s claims for fact checker Health Feedback have described these assertions as misleading, as they “misrepresented the results from scientific studies and [were] based on cherry-picked information”.
There have been some studies showing that SARS-CoV-2 can damage endothelial cells, which line the blood vessels. One study found signs of endothelial damage and fragments of SARS-CoV-2, including the spike protein, in the brains of 13 people who had died of Covid-19. Researchers injected the spike protein into mice and found that the animals displayed neurological symptoms similar to those seen in Covid-19 patients.
But as the Health Feedback article sets out, Dr Bridle’s claim rests on the assumption that if the viral spike protein can cause damage to the cardiovascular system, then the spike protein generated in vaccinated people should be capable of the same.
In actual fact, the two spike proteins behave very differently in the body. According to Health Feedback, the spike proteins generated by Covid-19 vaccines differ in three key ways to those attached to SARS-CoV-2. Firstly, in the case of the vaccines, the cells mostly break down the spike proteins into fragments. Secondly, the spike protein generated by a Covid-19 vaccine doesn’t assemble into new viral particles, unlike the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2. Thirdly, the spike protein in Covid-19 vaccines is genetically modified to enhance the immune response and to stop it binding to cell receptors in the same way the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein would.
Dr Byram’s claim that the spike protein leaves the site of the Covid-19 injection and enters the bloodstream, accumulating in other parts of the body, is based on a purportedly leaked Pfizer study carried out by Japanese researchers, which Dr Bridle said is backed up by a small study consisting of 13 participants who had received the Moderna vaccine and provided blood samples.
The study found that the spike protein was found in the blood samples of 11 out of 13 participants. The study specifically notes that “the clinical relevance of this finding is unknown and should be further explored”. Julie Bettinger, Associate Professor, University British Columbia told Health Feedback that “nothing about being detrimental is mentioned in the publication”.
American fact checking organisation PolitiFact contacted Dr Bridle directly to ask for more evidence to back up his claim that the Covid-19 vaccine spike proteins are toxins. In an automated email response he sent a document with further claims and questions about the vaccines, and said he planned to write a “comprehensive public report”.
PolitiFact said Dr Bridle had not directly produced any evidence to back up his claim.
At the time of writing, more than 40 million people in the UK have had at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine. To date, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has received reports of 406 UK reports of suspected adverse reactions to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in which the patient died shortly after vaccination, 863 reports for the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, four for the Moderna vaccine and 22 where the brand of vaccine was unspecified.
As we have written before, the Yellow Card system for reporting adverse events is based both on medic reports and patients self-reporting , and an adverse event that occurs after vaccination did not necessarily occur because of it.
In April the MHRA said there was a possible link between the Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine and incidents of rare blood clots with lowered platelets. As of 2 June, the MHRA had received Yellow Card reports of 372 cases of these specific blood clots.
As we have recently reported, researchers in Israel have found a possible link between mild myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) in young men and getting the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.
The Israeli government’s health department said there had been 275 cases of myocarditis reported between December 2020 and May 2021.
This article is part of our work fact checking potentially false pictures, videos and stories on Facebook. You can read more about this—and find out how to report Facebook content—here.
For the purposes of that scheme, we’ve rated this claim as partly false because supporting evidence has not been provided for the claims the article is based on, and experts have raised concerns that the conclusions are based on false assumptions and selective use of study results.
first if you get the vax and then get covid, won’t you be p1ssed the vax didn’t protect you from getting covid in the first place?
the definition of a vaccine, before they specifically changed it for the experimental treatment that is not a vax, was that one attribute of a vaccine is that it would precent you from getting the disease.
second does it not bother you that they told people it would stay in the arm, but the evidence shows it goes all over yoyr body and accumulates in other organs like the liver, spleen, etc? and its not a small amount, 25% stays in the local injection area, 75% of it goes all over your body.
all the dam lies.
Which sort of “vaccine” does this? The mRNA ones or all of the ones out there? Pfizer, Moderna, which one?
RE: first if you get the vax and then get covid, won’t you be p1ssed the vax didn’t protect you from getting covid in the first place?
According to what I’ve read, the vax makers (Pfizer, Moderna and J&J ) never promised 100% protection against Covid infection.
What they do promise is even if you were infected, the symptoms will be mild to non-existent, you will not need to be hospitalized and you will 100% not die of Covid.
just the mrna vaccines, as they are the ones that create the spike proteins. so as far as i know, moderna and pfizer have these specific problems
and the mrna vax’s are the vast majority of the vaxxes administered
but the others may have their own
the j and j vax has a guillian barr syndrome risk, ie some form of muscular paralysis that may or may not go away over time
the j an j vax also had some clotting problems for certain demographics
ok so they lied there to everyone
plenty of covax deaths have occurred
RE: plenty of covax deaths have occurred
Yes but not from Covid. :)
I am sure that fact brought great comfort to those dying from the covax
Talk about a faustian bargain
“we promise you won’t die from covid if you take the shot”
“we didn’t say the shot wouldn’t kill you”
Don’t buy it, I believe the spike protein is dangerous.
RE: just the mrna vaccines, as they are the ones that create the spike proteins. so as far as i know, moderna and pfizer have these specific problems
J&J vaccine instruct the cells in our arm (where the injection is given) to produce spike protein that is tethered to the surface of the cell. It is not secreted and thus does not float through the body.
According to the NIAID statement, “the spike protein is only detectable for a few days after immunization” in tests conducted in animals.
NIAID ( if you can believe them ) also said that IF enough excess spike proteins are shed into the bloodstream and bind to human cells expressing the ACE2 receptor, an infected person could theoretically experience additional symptoms. However (so they say), this is theoretical; the exact mechanism by which COVID-19 infection leads to cardiovascular symptoms is still unclear <-— an herein lies the unknown.
In other words, they are pure trash.
interesting, thanks for the j an j info
hard to know if to trust them, as pfizer and moderna lied about the spike proteins all staying at tge injection site
RE: “we didn’t say the shot wouldn’t kill you”
When J&J’s Covid vaccine was withdrawn for 2 weeks because of 10 known cases of thrombosis and clotting. The vaccine defenders were arguing this:
10 out of 8 million (the number vaccinated with J&J then ) is .000125%. Your chances of dying of Covid is 0.3%. That’s 2,400 times the risk of not getting vaccinated.
Sure as Snopes they are.
i guess in this case they were not concerned abput the typical underreporting of negative events
“Baseless” = 2020
“Unnevidenced” 2021
This propaganda is killing people
What they do promise is even if you were infected, the symptoms will be mild to non-existent, you will not need to be hospitalized and you will 100% not die of Covid.
_____________________
So I assume the people in the hospital with covid after the vax are just hypochondriacs
Sarah Turnnidge.....
Her credentials are such that she is to be he final authority?
Or a big pharma shill?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.