Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“We Don’t Have to Live with a Fraudulent Election” – Legal Scholar John Eastman Says State Legislature Has Authority to Replace Electors due to Fraudulent ResultsVIDEO
GATEWAY PUNDIT ^ | 7/19/2021 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 07/19/2021 10:27:55 AM PDT by bitt

Attorney and legal scholar John Eastman joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Monday morning.

Steve and John Eastman discussed Arizona Senate President Karen Fann’s OAN interview over the weekend. Fann suggested that the Arizona Senate does not have the authority to replace the electors in the state of Arizona.

Eastmen told Steve Bannon: “We can point to Section 2 of Title 3 of the United States Code that says when a state has had an election and has failed to make a choice on the day that was prescribed by law, meaning the choice that was made, the assumption is it was fraudulently given because of the illegal votes, the electors can be made on a subsequent date in such manner as the legislature in some state may direct.”

But there is a lot of work to be done before this could ever happen.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: alternatereality; electionfraud; fakewaypundit; january6th; johneastman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: Lurkinanloomin

Bingo.


81 posted on 07/19/2021 1:33:22 PM PDT by sauropod (The smartphone is the retina of the mind's eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Best Constitution based argument I’ve seen. Still the chances are slim to nonexistent with this Congress. Maybe better in the next but not by much ! This is why the election integrity issues most be vigorously fought now. You might have a ghost of a chance then but I’m more worried about the future. The more fraud detail and its extent that comes out the more the Biden agenda grinds to a halt. It can be completely checked with a good 2022, this will setup 2024.


82 posted on 07/19/2021 1:37:07 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Its the fraud! Of course a state can withdraw their electors in the event of proven fraud. If AZ, GA and PA withdraw their electors Biden doesn’t have 270. Then the calls for him to resign and Trump to be reinstated begin. Chances are all of the swing states And some others will do forensic audits. This thing is going to snowball.


83 posted on 07/19/2021 1:38:44 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Agreed. The electors already cast their vote, which is the sole purpose they serve. Replacing them now accomplishes nothing absent some mechanism to hold a "re-vote". And there isn't any such mechanism described anywhere in the Constitution.

People can talk about "declaring" all sorts of things, but unless you get both Congress and the Supreme Court to go along -- which ain't happening -- it's delusional.

84 posted on 07/19/2021 1:45:05 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Reily

“In my mind that’s exactly what the left wants us to do.”

In MY mind, exactly what the left wants us to do is roll over and give up — just like we always do.


85 posted on 07/19/2021 1:47:49 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (While the foundations are being destroyed, what are the righteous doing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: bitt

probably true they can do want they want. they’ll just have to wait until the next counting of presidential electors by congess in January 2025.


86 posted on 07/19/2021 1:55:18 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Never said give up!
I said fight battles that make sense !


87 posted on 07/19/2021 2:03:02 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

You misread my post, for 30 years the Uniparty jagoffs have been importing a permanent majority with no obstruction from all but a few Republicans.

Flimsey Grahamnesty and Micro Rubio KNOW they are voting for a permanent Democrat majority every time they vote for amnesty.

They won’t have that permanent majority until Assistant Democrats give it to them.


88 posted on 07/19/2021 2:04:18 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents)(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Reily
Those methods for removal are for legitimately elected presidents. Never, under common law for any case, are proven fraudsters given the benefits of their fraud.

The US Constitution is above common law. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land not common law.

I never said that common law superceeds The US Constitution. There is no contradiction with the Constitution. The Constitution doesn't address fraud of any kind.

Probably because common law and the founders knew as a basic common sense principle, that "fraud vitiates everything". Supreme court decisions and all of our laws are based on that basic principle.

89 posted on 07/19/2021 2:04:35 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too; Reily
"If Congress is willing to make the argument that: 1. Fraud vitiates everything” and there is no statute of limitations on "failure to qualify" if it is proven that there was fraud, and...

Yes, this.

90 posted on 07/19/2021 2:07:37 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
If AZ, GA and PA withdraw their electors Biden doesn’t have 270.

That is where you are wrong. Biden will still have more than 270, because the vote has already been taken. Neither the other states nor the U.S. Congress have to recognize any new vote totals. Unicorns notwithstanding.

Then the calls for him to resign and Trump to be reinstated begin.

If he resigns, Kamala becomes President.

And you still haven't mentioned my scenario where the Rust Belt states decide in 2018 that they no longer like Trump and decide to recall their electors. What happens then?

I fully support the audits. But I also realize that they won't change the 2020 Presidential election. It is possible, though, that they could result in new Senate elections, if the respective states so decide.
91 posted on 07/19/2021 2:09:32 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Excellent post !


92 posted on 07/19/2021 2:22:02 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Watch and learn as the reverse unfolds. A car thief does not get to keep the car. Biden will not get to steal this presidency. You are going to be amazed.


93 posted on 07/19/2021 2:25:47 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Then we are at the end of the constitution, and off the map.

Or rather, heading to a strong man rule by might, not right.

Maybe we are. Maybe that is the next phase. But I would rather not be the one to end the remains of the Republic


94 posted on 07/19/2021 2:48:33 PM PDT by redgolum (If this is civilization, I will be the barbarian. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

We left the Constitution behind on the day ALL of our elected and appointed swore in the ineligible non-natural born citizen Kenyan from Indonesia.


95 posted on 07/19/2021 3:28:45 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents)(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Fraud vitiates everything.


96 posted on 07/19/2021 5:33:38 PM PDT by Darnright (We live in interesting times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands; Georgia Girl 2

Please know that the FReeper you are posting to has posted that mass arrests of journalists were taking place, that there are Biden body doubles being used, that military tribunals are taking place in the White House, etc.

Her credibility is somewhat in question on matters of national politics and current events..


97 posted on 07/19/2021 5:50:56 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
All of these arguments about what processes are in place for Congress, courts, etc., to use with regards to the fraudulent election -- ALL OVERLOOK THE OBVIOUS.

Every elected position in the US House, Senate, state governors, state legislatures, and every other elected position, IS NOT LEGITIMATELY OCCUPIED, or at best, is in question due to the massive countrywide fraud.

98 posted on 07/19/2021 7:18:13 PM PDT by meadsjn (, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

There was a fairly recent Texas Supreme Court case, Pressley v. Casar, involving a challenge to an Austin city council election. The challenger lost in the trial court and the court of appeals, and appealed to the Texas Supreme Court. But while the case was pending in the Texas Supreme Court, the winner was re-elected and his new term had already begun. The Texas Supreme Court dismissed the case as moot, because a challenge to an official’s election becomes moot when the official’s term expires.

It is hard to see how the exact same principle would not apply to a challenge of the appointment of a presidential elector after he has voted. The only way around it is to ignore, as many do, the distinction between a state’s appointment of electors and the actual presidential election. It is clear that Trump’s own lawyers understood, though, that their challenges would become moot some time between the “safe harbor” date and January 6.


99 posted on 07/19/2021 7:52:48 PM PDT by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Bellagio
So let me get this straight … you’re going to sit there and tell me that “which Day shall be the same throughout the United States” does not mean the electoral votes are cast on the same day? I’m sorry — but you’re nuts.

State legislature delegates CAN challenge the joint session vote in congress by petition to amend their delegate votes. It is not cast in stone after the meeting of the delegates on election day in the state capitals.

I agree that a state legislature can amend their delegate votes after the Electoral College has convened. However, this only works if a separate slate of electors has convened on the same day as the Electoral College vote and formally cast their votes for another candidate. This actually happened in most of the contested states, with Trump’s electors convening in the state capitals and casting their votes. But what DIDN’T happen was that the legislatures in those states never took up the issue and followed up by sending the competing slates of electors to Congress for the January 6th session.

Retracting electors in the 2020 election at this point is like reversing an umpire’s bad decision in the 1978 World Series.

100 posted on 07/19/2021 8:00:23 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("And once in a night I dreamed you were there; I canceled my flight from going nowhere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson