Posted on 07/19/2021 10:27:55 AM PDT by bitt
Attorney and legal scholar John Eastman joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Monday morning.
Steve and John Eastman discussed Arizona Senate President Karen Fann’s OAN interview over the weekend. Fann suggested that the Arizona Senate does not have the authority to replace the electors in the state of Arizona.
Eastmen told Steve Bannon: “We can point to Section 2 of Title 3 of the United States Code that says when a state has had an election and has failed to make a choice on the day that was prescribed by law, meaning the choice that was made, the assumption is it was fraudulently given because of the illegal votes, the electors can be made on a subsequent date in such manner as the legislature in some state may direct.”
But there is a lot of work to be done before this could ever happen.
you’re making this harder than it needs to be; I had to read that a couple of times before I figured it out.
what do you reckon “this mess” is? I think “this mess” is the very real possibility that they could pass permanent, structural change that would destroy our individual liberties because we lost our firewall in the senate. what do you think “this mess” is? have I got the wrong “mess”?
which brings us back to georgia; you’ve happily, if not joyously, traded the mildly annoying geriatric republican and the fawning trump chick for reverend bomb thrower and the 30 year old wenis with ears — both hyper extremist liberal radicals. you seem supremely pleased with yourself over these two (arguably) rino skins nailed to the wall. but I think the two dead rinos are at the very core of “this mess”. so, now I’m confused as to how giving two senate seats away in a fit of petulance makes the country a better place.
as I said, I must be thinking about the wrong “mess”.
and you were right about the porn thread. hoooo doggy.
These were irrelevant under the 12th Amendment because they were never certified by a state governing body and submitted to Congress for the January 6th joint session. This is where the legislatures of these states failed miserably.
Well, just the ones who were elected / re-elected in 2020 (and since) who determined the Electoral College 'winner', and whose state has declared an UNLAWFUL election (due to fraud). And any run-off elections for fed offices based on a state's UNLAWFUL federal election.
Sorry to disappoint, but I did not want the two GA Senators to lose.
The GOP thought they could get rid of Trump and keep the Senate and the Democrats double crossed them.
The “mess” we are in is our nation hanging by a thread because Bush League Republicans that you advocate for have been importing a permanent Democrat majority for 30 years.
Now the freshly re-elected ones are working to give the Democrats that permanent majority on a silver platter called amnesty that Flimsey Grahanesty has voted for THREE times already.
When some one tells you they are a traitor, it’s time to stop voting for them.
wait. I could have sworn you were all in on the boycott. death to rinos, to hell with the consequences, kill ‘em all, let God sort ‘em out. no? are you sure? any chance that you’re experiencing buyer’s remorse?
roy moore? another senate seat down the drain? any of this ringing a bell?
if the democrats had really been sitting on a 30 year majority, and the uniparty jagoffs had not been soing something productive to obstruct, we would be france right now.
and I’m equally sorry to disappoint, but I have as much disdain for spineless moderates as I do for hysterical purists.
No... that refers to a uniform protocol, a run-up time limit. It does not mean you have a single set day to ‘choose’ electors. It means there would be a cut-off day in which you must have completed the appointment/validation and resolved any challenges to any appointment by legal remedy of all electors that qualify to be an official delegate that has been given authorization to cast a vote in their respective state capitals that will be the same day for all states.
If a state legislature has not yet chosen by a statutory date(a prescribed deadline) and validated all entitled delegates ... then any delegate that failed will not be included in the vote tally once the votes have been cast in the state capital.
This does not mean a one-time shot. It simply means a set of rules in the processing of delegate votes.
State legislature delegates CAN challenge the joint session vote in congress by petition to amend their delegate votes. It is not cast in stone after the meeting of the delegates on election day in the state capitals.
So no... there is no constitutional same-day choosing and you have not shown me that it is imposed by the constitution... it’s not.
“What remains is quo warranto “
That’s the one Lindell has mentioned in relation to the voting machine issue. Basically Biden has to prove that he is legally sitting in that position.
Personally, I don’t know why they don’t refer to the SCOTUS decision in the 1800s that “Fraud vitiates everything”.
I realize I wasn’t clear in that post.
I was trying to suggest to the Arizona legislature that they can fix who they sent to the US Senate, if, as seems likely the winner(s) did not actually win this election, and they should do it ASAP.
The Dems are making the most of their illegal control of all of the Federal Government while these legislatures are playing pickup-stix.
“there is no legal procedure to permit a ‘re-vote” of the Electoral College.”
Is there a procedure that forbids it? We’re in uncharted territory here, for sure.
The Democrats can steal anything they want and make up rules as they go along.
Yes, Democrats are free to steal any election they want because there is no political party substantively opposing them.
Don’t get in the weeds on this one. It’s not our job to count hanging chads or whatever for months on end. We elected Republicans to defend us against the stolen election and they failed miserably. All of them. In fact they certified it and disenfranchised us. Sorry, that bell is not going to be unrung.
You can revote all you want.
But this is how a president is removed.
Article II Section IV says how a president is to be removed.
Everything else is magical thinking to make us feel better !
Concentrate on fixing the voting intgerity problem !
Everything else is a diversion from that!
Sorry but I’m going to have to insist that you read the 10th amendment. Any state can recall its electors or simply declare the election invalid and call a revote.
Think about this. Every election forward will be determined by voter fraud if you don't allow enough time for audits and to create a case.
The fraudsters are the kingmakers.
Those methods for removal are for legitimately elected presidents. Never, under common law for any case, are proven fraudsters given the benefits of their fraud.
There isn’t anything expressly prohibiting having 5 Presidents simultaneously either. Does that mean the Constitution permits it?
If Congress is willing to make the argument that:
My plan:
For this to work, someone has to argue that the "failed to qualify" has no statute of limitations, and that fraud and cover-up (“Fraud vitiates everything”) supersedes any requirement to discover the conspiracy in the few weeks between the election and inauguration.
By using the 20th amendment to declare the office vacant due to failure to qualify instead of vacating the office due to impeachment, death, or resignation, the procedure laid out in the 20th amendment to fill the vacancy would apply (which bypasses the Speaker ascending to the Presidency).Amendment 20
If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.Consider the clause "If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify..."The conjunction "or" separates two distinct cases: 1) when the President is not chosen by the inauguration date, or 2) when the President "failed to qualify." I'm arguing to disconnect the "failed to qualify" from "chosen by the time fixed..."
"Failed to qualify" due to a conspiracy to defraud would have no statute of limitations, and Congress should ex post facto declare the office vacant on the grounds of the 20th amendment, name the Acting President, and then pass a law to qualify a new President.
- Republicans retake control of Congress due to mass calls for Democrat resignations for ill-gotten wins.
- Via the 20th amendment, Congress declares the actual winner (President Trump) to fill the vacancy as "Acting President" until the office can be filled by someone who qualifies.
- Via the 20th amendment and Article II Section I Clause 3, Congress passes a law moving the Presidential election up to 2022, and that it will forever be on a new four-year schedule beginning in 2022. This will satisfy Presidential term limits, as Trump will fill less than half of Biden's illegitimate term and then get his own second term. He won't be penalized for losing part of his term because of Democrat criminality.
-PJ
“Concentrate on fixing the voting intgerity problem !”
No; that’s not good enough. This needs to be fixed, one way or another.
The US Constitution is above common law. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land not common law.
That’s exactly what we need to do waste energy, time and money on something that can’t be done !
In my mind that’s exactly what the left wants us to do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.