Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DR ROBERT MALONE, INVENTOR OF MRNA TECHNOLOGY, INTERVIEWED BY SONIA ELIJAH [Video, includes transcript of key portion thanks to FReeper Cathi]
bitchute.com ^ | July 4th, 2021 | Bitchute: SoniaElijah, Dr. Robert Malone

Posted on 07/06/2021 5:13:24 PM PDT by ransomnote

Thank you to FReeper Cathi for transcribing a key segment of the interview (text below).

Dr Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA technology, interviewed by Sonia Elijah (bitchute.com)

EXCERPT

Interviewer: Given that 3.96 million have died world wide from covid-19. The counter arguments says that the benefits of these vaccines outweigh the risks and that it’s our only chance to get back to normal. What do you make of that?

Dr. Robert Malone: Let’s dissect that; unpack that just for a moment. What you are talking about there is the aggregate mortality across all ages and if you just take the slightest bit more granularity in those data what you are really saying is that we have had 3.96 million deaths. I am willing to bet that at least 3 million of those are going to be in ages 65 and above; probably even more. That’s a little bit of a sleight of hand to say it that way because you’re applying the death rate in aggregate to the whole population; but the deaths are only occurring in the elderly for the most part or people with some severe or significant pre-existing conditions. So to apply that event across the whole population and then say on the basis of what’s happening to the old we need to do this to everybody. That is not aligned with normal vaccination process. Normally when we roll out a new vaccine we do analysis for each of the key cohorts...elderly, infants, children, adolescents, healthy normal adults immuno-suppressed and pregnant woman. Each of those are done separately. And we’re saying, no, no we are just going to throw out the past practices and we’re just going to apply it to an aggregate. That’s the first point.

Second point and this obviously feeds back into justification for authorization for children. The logic that we have to vaccinate the whole population in order to prevent this and get back to normal. Let’s unpack that for a moment. What they are talking about is herd immunity. Herd immunity is actually a precise epidemiological term. It is well understood; it is what happens... In order to get to herd immunity it means if you’re infected the probability that you will infect someone else is less than one. In other words if we get to the point that everyone who is infected infects less than one other person then the virus can’t circulate anymore and it becomes extinguished and we call that herd immunity. Herd immunity can be achieved by a large percentage of the population having already been infected. It can be achieved by vaccination if the vaccines are sterilizing or are blocking to a significant extent. Here’s another technical term: transmissibility. That has to do with that rate I was talking about.

What is the probability if you are infected how many other people are you going to infect. In order to calculate the percent uptake of vaccine required in order to achieve herd immunity we have to know the data on the impact of the vaccine on transmissibility. We don’t have those data. The data we are collecting....and when you hear 90% efficacy....it protects to a very significant degree...it protects you from getting hospitalized or dying when you might otherwise have been hospitalized or died. So those are disease endpoints. This disease is largely driven by your personal immune response against the virus. It’s not the virus that kills you; it’s your response to the virus. It’s hyper inflammatory syndrome, not everybody gets it. So when you measure disease and death it’s only an indirect relationship to effects on the virus and the virus spread.

To this point you and the people in the UK know that people who were previously vaccinated are getting infected with delta. And the WHO put out a recommendation that we all need to wear masks again because of delta. Now you all understand what this means....it means that you prior vaccination is not protecting you from getting infected by delta and it’s not protecting you from having virus replication if you get exposed to delta and it’s not protecting you from shedding virus if you’ve already been exposed to delta which means you can infect other people. So, how frequently? We don’t have the data. I don’t have the data; I can’t tell you. What I can tell you is if you ever hear a public health official say we have to have 70% vaccination uptake in the whole population to protect us by achieving herd immunity what you can immediately conclude is that they don’t have a fig of an understanding about what they are talking about because the data doesn’t exist. We can’t make that calculation; it’s simple. So the point is the vaccines are not what we call sterilizing; I’m talking about the ability of the virus to reproduce. So they are not sterilizing for the virus....you can still get infection, you can still get viral replication and you can still spread virus. How frequently? I don’t know.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: covid; covid19; desperation; doesiteverstop; herewegoagain; ifitsontheinternet; itmustbetrue; itneverstops; ivermectin; notthisagain; obsession; ransomnut; vaxhysteria; whocares; zotthesetards
Cathi, That took a lot of work! Thank you. Whenever I post transcripts, some pm me to say they appreciate transcripts because Internet connection prevents them from watching the video. For others, it saves so much time! :D
1 posted on 07/06/2021 5:13:24 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cathi; Unrepentant VN Vet; metmom; Fractal Trader; SecAmndmt; bagster; doc maverick; ...

Ping


2 posted on 07/06/2021 5:13:39 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathi; ransomnote

Thank you.


3 posted on 07/06/2021 5:21:56 PM PDT by BykrBayb (Lung cancer free since 11/9/07. Colon cancer free since 7/7/15. Obama free since 1/20/17. PTL ~ Þ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Ping


4 posted on 07/06/2021 5:25:50 PM PDT by Jayster (Legalize Marijuana )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

See chart, posted by Dr Malone .....UK breakdown

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3973801/posts?page=18#18

~~~~~

Odd that this is happening in UK and not US 🙃

/s


5 posted on 07/06/2021 5:26:33 PM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; Cathi

1000 thanks for this !!!


6 posted on 07/06/2021 5:26:50 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; Cathi

Thank you very much, Cathi!


7 posted on 07/06/2021 5:31:48 PM PDT by zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; Cathi

Thank you both!


8 posted on 07/06/2021 5:55:53 PM PDT by HypatiaTaught (president FRAUD of the divided states of China)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Great talk.

Covers how Pfizer (at least) ‘cooked the books’ with some of their submissions to the FDA.

Also, interesting how FDA, et al, let Pfizer submit sub-standard studies while rejecting ivermectin for not having gold-standard studies.


9 posted on 07/06/2021 6:41:26 PM PDT by 13foxtrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 13foxtrot
Great talk. Covers how Pfizer (at least) ‘cooked the books’ with some of their submissions to the FDA. Also, interesting how FDA, et al, let Pfizer submit sub-standard studies while rejecting ivermectin for not having gold-standard studies.

Good point. I recently heard someone say Ivermectin can't be trusted because it hasn't been studied enough and here we have 'instant vaccines' instead?
At least Ivermectin was approved by the FDA and used for decades and has been proven safe. Foreign countries rely on it for riverblindless and other illnesses. Safe, until Covid comes along? And they haven't withdrawn it from other uses over 'safety'.

Same with HCQ/AZ. Safe until Covid came along and then it's treated like poison.

Such evil. They wouldn't even give HCQ or Ivermectin the same Emergency Use Authorization they gave the 'vaccines', even though HCQ and Ivermectin have been FDA approved for decades.

10 posted on 07/06/2021 6:54:56 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I read that Wikipedia changed the name of the inventor/discoverer of mRNA process to someone who will “say the right things”. POOF, then history is changed.


11 posted on 07/06/2021 6:58:52 PM PDT by Glad2bnuts ((“If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glad2bnuts

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=Dr+Robert+Malone&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1


12 posted on 07/06/2021 7:03:14 PM PDT by Glad2bnuts ((“If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; All
"They wouldn't even give HCQ or Ivermectin
the same Emergency Use Authorization
they gave the 'vaccines',
even though HCQ and Ivermectin have been
FDA approved for decades...."


(edited)_EeWaNYcXsAIisj8.jpeg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Battle !!


Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


13 posted on 07/06/2021 7:05:07 PM PDT by musicman (The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 13foxtrot

Hell will be packed with these psychopaths from Pfizer, Moderna, AMA, CDC, and other related creepy organizations.

Stay away from them, and guard your children.

Absolute evil is driving these rat-poison “vaccines” from the feds down to the hospitals, and we must keep clear of it.


14 posted on 07/06/2021 7:06:41 PM PDT by Prole ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Glad2bnuts

I read that Wikipedia changed the name of the inventor/discoverer of mRNA process to someone who will “say the right things”. POOF, then history is changed.

~~~~~~~~~~~~
WOW! I didn’t know that.

I managed to copy the CDC’d definition of ‘vaccine’ before they changed history to define it as something that helps resist illness or basically, poorly written text which they could contort to ‘cover’ Covid “vaccines”. I think the original, normal definition was replaced with word salad stupidity the day after I copied it. A few months ago, they replaced the text a second time to restore the original - apparently to many people were laughing at them?

Gotta be quick or you never know what reality once was! :(


15 posted on 07/06/2021 7:30:23 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

just stocked up on invermectin myself. Tractor Supply. My first time in store. What fun. Loved the several pens of chicks and ducks. a lot of products I had NO CLUE regarding. I was pushed for time but hope to get back there & do some more poking around


16 posted on 07/07/2021 12:36:20 AM PDT by DollyCali (Don't tell God how big your storm is -- tell the storm how big your God iszecj te)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; null and void; aragorn; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; Black Agnes; blueyon; ...
Inventor of mRNA technology removed from Wikipedia after he warned against taking COVID jabs

Dr. Robert Malone is no longer recognized by Wikipedia as being the creator of the technology used in some COVID-19 vaccines.

Canceled:

Publicly boycott or withdraw support from (a person, organization, etc.) for promoting beliefs that are regarded as socially unacceptable.

17 posted on 07/07/2021 11:55:52 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; Cathi

Thank you to BOTH of you for all your efforts.


18 posted on 07/07/2021 6:41:39 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (If I wanted to live in China, I would move there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Thanks for posting this article.


19 posted on 07/07/2021 9:22:10 PM PDT by matthew fuller (Biden's illegal presidency is a demonazi declaration of war on Americans and civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
LucyT : "Canceled:
Publicly boycott or withdraw support from (a person, organization, etc.)
for promoting beliefs that are regarded as socially unacceptable. "

The last line should read :
" for promoting beliefs that are regarded as socially politically unacceptable.

20 posted on 07/08/2021 7:25:54 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson