Ping for your interest
” to include a recommendation that asymptomatic and mild cases be treated with Ivermectin.”
Treatment, not preventive. Yet article is claiming a preventive.
Pretty flimsy evidence without any highly trusted studies.
.
/s
Hmmm ...
This link says that India is not supporting ivermectin -
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.indiatoday.in/amp/coronavirus-outbreak/story/revised-health-ministry-guidelines-stop-usage-of-ivermectin-doxycycline-in-covid-treatment-1811809-2021-06-07
And this link says there is no link between the drug and reducing Covid
From the start, every single one of these drugs has had information about it's effectiveness denied and suppressed , lies about it's safe use have been promulgated with coordinated, full court press media propaganda campaigns and their use had been banned by politicized governors, politicians and health organizations
And there is Trump blathering on again tonight about his great “vaccines” and how we’d all be dead without them.
Why would this information be suppressed by our media outlets? Well, under the FDA’s rules, an emergency use authorization (EUA) like the ones given for the three main experimental gene therapy vaccines can only remain in force so long as there is not a superior alternative therapy available. When you consider that the absolute risk reduction from taking Ivermectin as a COVID prophylaxis is far superior to that of the products from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, the justification for administering these experimental treatments disappears.
—
Big Pharma and Big Tech are willing to gain their obscene profits at the expense of a pile of corpses.
Smartest thing they ever did was tell Gates to take a hike.
Why Was News of India’s Success With Ivermectin Against the Coronavirus Suppressed?>
Ask Anthony Fauci. He knows.
India did it right.
And here on Free Republic, we still are thinking that Ivermectin does not work well??
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has upgraded their recommendation for the “miraculous” drug ivermectin, making it an option for use in treating COVID-19 within the United States.
The result comes one week after Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory—founding members of the FLCCC, along with Dr. Andrew Hill, researcher and consultant to the World Health Organization (WHO), presented their data before the NIH Treatment Guidelines Panel.
A press release from FLCCC explains the “new designation upgraded the status of ivermectin from ‘against’ [the drug’s use] to ‘neither for nor against,’ which is the same recommendation given to monoclonal antibodies and convalescent plasma, both widely used across the nation.” “By no longer recommending against ivermectin use,” the statement said, “doctors should feel more open in prescribing ivermectin as another therapeutic option for the treatment of COVID-19. This may clear its path towards FDA [Food and Drug Administration] emergency use approval.”
“Ivermectin is one of the world’s safest, cheapest and most widely available drugs,” explained Dr. Kory, President of the FLCCC Alliance. “The studies we presented to the NIH revealed high levels of statistical significance showing large magnitude benefit in transmission rates, need for hospitalization, and death. What’s more, the totality of trials data supporting ivermectin is without precedent.”
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3932387/posts?page=75#75
************************************
Dosages and Such: https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-I-MASK-Protocol-v4-2020-11-22.pdf **********************************
Charts for both early treatment and prophylaxis: https://c19early.com/ https://c19legacy.com/ ***************************************
Sources for Ivermectin:
1) Your own doctor, yo will need a prescription, but that failing,
2) International Sources Ziverdo Kit for early treatment: https://www.indiamart.com/proddetail/ziverdo-kit-22974209655.html
Ivermectin for prophylaxis: ( .20 mg per kilo of body weight according to protocol with Zinc, Quercetin and Vitamin D)
https://dir.indiamart.com/search.mp?ss=ivermectin+tablet&src=ascontext%3Akwd%3Divermectin%3Apos%3D2%3Acat%3D571%3Amcat%3D445108&prdsrc=1&mcatid=445108&catid=571 ****************************************
Dosage Protocol:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-I-MASK-Protocol-v4-2020-11-22.pdf
***********************************************
See also this research article:
“Ivermectin docks to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain attached to ACE2” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343390023_Ivermectin_docks_to_the_SARS-CoV-2_spike_receptor-binding_domain_attached_to_A
*******************************************
bump
As a side note to this thread, please consider the following.
I saw it with my own eyes!
FN Maria Bartiromo some weeks back had guests knowledgeable of drug industry who indicated the following. The patent(s) on Merck’s Ivermectin had expired, so not as much government money to be made in making Ivermectin to save everybody from CV19.
Corrections, insights welcome.
Yea, but the difference was that India couldn’t afford to have hundreds of millions of sick people and millions of dead people from the virus, as they’re still a Third World country.
Unlike the West, they really had no choice but to quickly deal with the virus, which meant using Ivermectin.
By the way, don’t be surprised if we find out that Democrat leaders have also been taking Ivermectin, since none of them seem to ever get the virus.
It’s not the vaccines or Ivermectin that did it in India. It’s the lockdowns. I hate it but it’s true. Lockdowns have huge social costs but they do stop the spread.
In India, the falloff in cases happened in both the states that embraced Ivermectin (Delhi) and the states that rejected Ivermectin (Tamil-Nadu).
What these states had in common is that they implemented hard lockdowns. Their falloff in cases corresponds with when they implemented their lockdowns.
You can google the data.