|
Posted on 07/01/2021 1:25:17 PM PDT by ransomnote
(h/t BusterDog)
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Ha. If only.
:)
‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ host asks who’s really in charge if Joe Biden isn’t running things.
*************
Obama’s Minions?
Hillary’s compatriots?
Soros?
The Socialist Intelligentcia?
Doctor Jill?
Ping to #714
Oz secure press archive
I watched one of his shorter vids. What he is doing is a Q proof, and I think he is really on to something, but I don’t need any more proof of Q. His exercise is interesting, but I don’t see it getting to a timing decision, which is my interest.
Christopher Sing did not commit suicide. A message was sent to anyone that printed or told anything derogatory on a Clinton. Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton can add another scalp to their belts. The Government we are under now kills how and when and whom they please. Believe it or not.
But, they’ll just say “Oh, guess I was wrong. Wonder what’s on TV.”
Just sayin' ...
https://t.me/theprofessorsrecord/1222
It looks like I owe many of you an apology.
I often want to see the good in people, especially those with great talent. I search for patriots to unite with, because there are so few leading the charge.
Many of you know that I have often shared Brian Cates' work. Months ago, I asked many of you to join his channel when he had far fewer subscribers.
My wife and I even donated money to support his work.
However, as the weeks have passed by, I've started to regret that decision more and more.
I've observed a mean streak in Brian's work. Pride. Arrogance. Chastising folks in his chat rooms. Making things unnecessarily personal.
Brian makes it a consistent point to share how he, a "real journalist," investigates matters by checking his sources and doing a thorough job.
I'll revisit this last point shortly.
Brian has pieced many things together that I think are true. But in other areas, I believe he has profound blind spots.
I've interviewed both Joshua Merritt and Lin Wood, and have the future honor of interviewing Sidney Powell.
I've researched each extensively. In fact, I'll wager I've researched their lawsuits, and the affidavits in support thereof, far more than Brian Cates.
And, I mean it's not even close.
I am also in possession of Joshua Merritt's military service discharge records, and conducted a three hour interview with him months ago.
At no time, has Joshua misrepresented his military experience. In fact, the first 30 minutes of my first interview, includes a painstaking history of his service in the military.
Instead of doing his homework, however, Brian has recirculated talking points from a mainstream media hit piece written by professional liars.
Now for the law.
Under Rule 701 of the Rules of Evidence, Joshua would easily be qualified as an expert in cyber-security. Expert designation can be acquired in a variety of ways. Experience, training, and education are all avenues.
Brian, a non-lawyer, conflates the evidentiary standard, suggesting incorrectly, that Joshua would have to have served in an official military intelligence capacity, to warrant an expert designation.
Brian is wrong. Dead wrong.
Joshua had expertise in hacking prior to his military service, and acquired cyber security experience during, and after, his military service.
Joshua was wounded in the service of our country and deserves far better.
A "real journalist" ALWAYS seeks comment, and solicits both sides of a story before publishing.
Brian failed to do either in the case of Joshua Merritt.
I will be unsubscribing from Brian Cates' channel, and I apologize if you subscribed as a result of my initial enthusiasm.
I invite Brian to do a real time interview with Joshua, and myself, so he can do the right thing.
And that's print a retraction and apology.
Next up, let's address my foxhole buddy, Lin Wood.
Again, I apologize for my misjudgment. I will strive to do better.
I’d surmise there most certainly are. And, additionally, vids to view, pause and screen shot of the same.
Something to dig for!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3973133/posts?page=1
Police arrest 11 after standoff with ‘heavily armed men’ who do ‘not recognize our laws’ in Wakefield
boston herald ^ | 7/3/2021 | SEAN PHILIP COTTER
Free to a good posting home. I have reached my self-imposed limit on the number of vax-related articles I will post on the main board in a day.
From American Thinker
July 3, 2021
Vaccine propaganda and injection indecision
By Jack Gleason
“You are now presented with a dilemma: ‘whom do I trust with this potentially life-altering decision? Which is worse, the disease or the cure?’
Ask yourself, which is more likely in our new world where government officials, news media, and social media have all teamed up to present only one side of an issue?
When were the first incidences of information and videos being “fact-checked” and removed? When were the first cases of websites actually being “de-platformed”? When, in our history, have doctors and scientists been pressured, vilified, and even fired from their jobs for expressing their honest opinions about the most important disease facing our planet?
If you think back, this all started with two subjects: Hunter Biden’s ties to China before the 2020 election and the press conference by America’s Frontline Doctors talking about effective treatments for COVID.
What happened to the free exchange of ideas and information in the United States?
Whom do you believe: doctors, scientists and real people telling their stories, or Big Tech–controlled media pushing a narrative to ‘get the vaccine so you can hug your grandmother’?”
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/07/vaccine_propaganda_and_injection_indecision.html
“
yep...they call them surgical face masks...you have to dig into the first link...
but check this out: (It’s in the section in blue)
FDA Revokes Emergency Use Authorizations for Non-NIOSH-Approved Disposable Respirators and Decontamination Systems as Access to FDA-authorized and NIOSH-approved N95s Increases Nationwide
I wonder who is the vice-president in charge of checking every person to determine if they are wearing un-approved masks?
Masks No Longer Authorized:
3/19/2021 Homtex, Inc. Sovereign America Surgical Mask
Model #: 2000SM1, Blue color
02/03/2021 EcoGuard Inc.
Surgical Mask - Disposable Single-Use 3-Ply Earloop
Model #: EcoGuard B ECO01
Surgical Mask - Disposable Single-Use 3-Ply Tie-on
Model #: EcoGuard B ECO02
01/22/2021 Premier Guard USA LLC Premier Guard USA Surgical Face Mask 20-1002-SFM3
Just shoot me...
I see. I was very interested in his connections to the Law of War, and 11.3 meaning not a date, but a part or chapter of the LoW. Thus verifying Q drops about the military - “the only way”, etc.
I guess if we knew timing, the enemy would as well. In my (useless!) opinion, we’ll see action this summer. I think hard evidence made public about the stolen election will be enough to start rolling. Even just one state.
From the aviation FYI desk this morning:
The callsign of the aircraft carrying BidAn this morning to Michagan was ‘SAM46’.
Now back to your regularly scheduled Maracopa Audit and Sarasota Rally coverage.
“My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us.......”
Probably, because that is how people who think every thing is about them, think.
White Lady
It was rough but not as bad as the huge steel slide.
Class action law suits are a big scam that mostly benefits the lawyers prosecuting the case. For example, the tobacco law suit; millions of people have a potential grievance -- BUT, the lawyers cannot bring suit against the tobacco companies because they do not have legal standing. The lawyers need 'victims' to sign on to the class action lawsuit. THAT gives the lawyers standing - they represent grieved parties seeking recompense.
The tobacco suit was settled for more than a billion dollars as I remember. The attorneys figured up their extensive working hours and expenses, which came to a considerable portion of the total settlement. 'Victims' complained that the attorneys took the bulk of the settlement, leaving them too little as the grieved parties.
My son once participated in a class action suit. He received something like $16. That is the sad truth of most class action suits : the attorneys benefit the most.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
