Posted on 06/29/2021 6:24:46 AM PDT by Enlightened1
JAIL for Any doctor in Australia prescribing HCQ or Ivermectin
https://twitter.com/TanyaRo58329998/status/1409029497052139520
TROUBLING number of adverse effects from jab.
Official Aussie health data shows that 48.8 % of survey participants reported adverse effects from jab.
They trash ivermectin with lots of evidence supporting its use but see no problem with rushed rollout of jab.
https://www.ausvaxsafety.org.au/safety-data/covid-19-vaccines
Unfrigginbeliveable…Marxist scum.
Keep in mind these are the people reporting it, and it’s nearly 50%. Check out this reply.
“My husband is one of them. But he hasn’t reported it and no one has asked so his experience isn’t recorded. There must be so many people like him. So the % of reactions would be even higher”
https://twitter.com/WellyBoot9/status/1409026242557341703
What happens when the majority of their physicians decide to retire in response to that edict?
Some new illicit drugs eh? No doubt certain elements will be able to provide.
They will opt to keep their incomes.
Buy the paste/gel used for animals, but use it for yourself.
When government forcefully takes on the role of “doctor”, the People will always suffer in the end.
Call me a fool, but if what is standard protocol isn’t working, I don’t care what other choice I have. Licking furniture, playing records backwards, or Ivermectin and hydrochlornique.
But for some legal idiot to put a MD in jail for saving lives, some people just need to be set on fire and laughed at. This bureaucratic idiot is committing mass murder by proxy, without the courage to wear a NAZI uniform
HCQ trials were rigged with planned fatally high doses of HCQ.
Patients were given 2,400 mg qD !
NOW is silent
My body my choice doesnt really mean that
Don’t they have mosquitos in Australia? What about malaria?
What happens when the majority of their physicians decide to retire in response to that edict?
~~~
I’ll take obvious answers for 200 Alex.
You throw them in jail for retiring.
Use the same reasoning for your fascism. Collusive retirement is against the public interest.
This is easy. It doesn’t take geniuses to rule with an iron hand. In fact, quite the opposite. Controlling people is a compensation for insecurity and inadequacy.
The CCP is firmly in control of Oz, Britain, Canada...
We are on the menu.
The Virus Pandemic Industrial Complex is in business for people and companies to make a profit off the afflicted population. There's money to be made in the experimental vaccines and new drugs.
Follow the money.
>>> Use the same reasoning for your fascism.
My fascism???
I was just asking a question.... What happens?
I was not making any predictions or suggestions.
I said nothing of collusion.
If I were a doctor who had taken an oath to do no harm,
and then was forced by law to do so, then I think I
would be obligated to resign to fulfill my oath.
Now... assuming all doctors take this oath seriously,
and assuming that all the doctors down under are actually free, I think it’s a fair scenario to explore.
Apparently, both of those assumptions are seriously wrong
according to your observations and belief.
Who knows... maybe you are right.
Their fascism.
Bad turn of phrase.
If “they” are insisting on the threat of death from COVID, then “they” should be at similar risk from those they threaten.
“What happens when the majority of their physicians decide to retire in response to that edict?”
Do you know how many American doctors are retiring these days, in response to all the med-rule bullshit? Get ready...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.