Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Couple Charged $18K for Uprooting 36 Joshua Trees
Hi-Desert Star ^ | Jun 25, 2021

Posted on 06/28/2021 12:53:29 PM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: nickcarraway

I don’t know why anyone would do this.

They were certain to know the law on it because they tried to hide it.

Yes, it is a criminal act.

Do not be surprised if they purchases the property after the restrictions were implemented.

They should have been fined the full $4,100 per tree.


41 posted on 06/28/2021 1:35:54 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

No doubt whoever knocked down those trees knew they were there before they bought the property and knew there were laws protecting them.

Pay the fine.


42 posted on 06/28/2021 1:36:25 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (I love my country. It’s my government that I hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

I was thinking the permission/forgiveness thing. Essentially it cost them $500 each to get rid of these things they didn’t want.

Permission would never have been granted.


43 posted on 06/28/2021 1:36:26 PM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
It's never the CRIME that gets you in trouble; it's the nosy neighbor!


44 posted on 06/28/2021 1:40:18 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Illegal aliens can destroy anything they want in that area.


45 posted on 06/28/2021 1:40:56 PM PDT by CodeToad (Arm up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?
They should work around the existing landscape.

Why do developers look at trees and the first thing they think is, 'let's cut down the trees'?

If I picked a wilderness area to build a house I would do so because of the per-existing landscape. Why would I want to alter the landscape which is likely why I picked that location?

It makes no sense. Pick a lot without trees if you don't want trees. Save money on tree removal.

I don't get it.

46 posted on 06/28/2021 1:42:09 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The law is only a year old. Could they not claim the trees were theirs if they had the property before the law changed?


47 posted on 06/28/2021 1:42:11 PM PDT by Nateman (Click on my name to see how America can be saved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Permission would never have been granted.

Then find a lot that doesn't have tree. Why pick a lot that has trees you don't want?

48 posted on 06/28/2021 1:46:14 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The state Fish & Wildlife Department said 'Achtung Baby' when the Joshua Trees were cut down.

Property owners should have burned them in an Unforgettable Fire ...

... {sorry ... couldn't help myself ...}

49 posted on 06/28/2021 1:54:32 PM PDT by bassmaner (He y commies: I'm a white male, and guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Why the hell they did not transplant them?

They are not that hard to do that.


50 posted on 06/28/2021 1:55:59 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Do atheists know about that?


51 posted on 06/28/2021 2:01:09 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

These are trees owned by the homeowner. Government is overreaching.

If they were truly interested in preserving the tress, they would let people like this be able to advertise and sell them to other people who would take them and replant tgem in other locations. The trees remain alive somewhere else, so government retards is happy, homeowners get paid to remove unwanted trees, homeowners are happy.


52 posted on 06/28/2021 2:02:24 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz
Why the hell they did not transplant them?

Or design around them and make them part of your landscape. They would have made a great yard feature adding value to the property while requiring practically no maintenance other than picking up a frond once every two years.

What is this obsession with seeing trees and wanting to cut them down?

53 posted on 06/28/2021 2:03:10 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Meet California’s Methuselah Tree, The Oldest Tree In The World

54 posted on 06/28/2021 2:14:33 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Have you ever had White Pines?


55 posted on 06/28/2021 2:20:45 PM PDT by PTBAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The developers also agreed to not violate any law for the diversion period, which starts at 24 months but may be terminated after 12 if they fully comply.

So if they're real good they can start breaking the law again in a year.

56 posted on 06/28/2021 2:31:48 PM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (⭐⭐To the left, truth is right-wing extremism.⭐⭐)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

That is exactly right, they don’t care about the trees, they care about paying your dues first before you kill them. Environmental permit and study, Removal permits, Etc. Etc. It is all about the money not the trees.


57 posted on 06/28/2021 2:52:20 PM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: crz

Only a 3rd party licensed and approved environmental contractor can do that.


58 posted on 06/28/2021 2:54:24 PM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

It is all about the money not the trees.

......the gubmint wants its cut before you cut.


59 posted on 06/28/2021 3:11:55 PM PDT by drSteve78 (Je suis deplorable. WE'RE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

Its Cal. So...

I have seen them dig them things up all over here and replant them. Barrel Cactus and everything. But this aint Cal..


60 posted on 06/28/2021 3:26:26 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson