Posted on 06/28/2021 12:16:22 PM PDT by packagingguy
...Lindell said the data was brought to him, a private businessman, but did not say how or why. Nor did he say identify U.S. agencies with access to the same data...
Any clues? Anybody?
Are you his lawyer?
Or prosecuter?
I think he is using again
I have the same questions. Also, finding packets from China hitting your router happens every day, as hackers are continually banging on the doors...
I’ll take one mattress topper, two queen size MyPillows and a pair of slippers. Charge it.
I was gonna say, I could do a packet trace right now and provide proof that the Chinese AND the Russians are talking to my network. And packets are insignificant. Transactions can span thousands if not millions of packets depending on the data being exchanged, and unless there was some sort of SSL inspection configured, any encrypted packets are unreadable.
I have seen him talking numerous times about have actual Packet Captures, I am highly skeptical.
I hope he’s not selling snake oil or being used and ultimately totally disgraced.
The volume of data and the number of routers you would have to have control of is huge, plus the back office machines that store the packet captures because they will not be on the routers.....
No I am asking anyone who knows how he got his information. For instance a network administrator can do packet capture on any computer he oversees. That is quite different than packet capture on multiple computers in key swing states.
I would like to believe his data is real, so I am asking is there any way a computer expert could intercept this much communication.
My opinion is that no, there is no way that what he is saying is correct. I think that he believes it, but he just doesn’t understand the underlying technologies well enough to tell bullshit from fact.
I may have been fooled, but; in my opinion, Lindell did a darn good job investigating voter fraud.
The only things that matter:
1. Were the votes counted cast by legal voters only; and
2. Were the votes counted correctly
Does not matter if a billion Chinese packets were observed.
I agree. Lindell is practically obsessed about this. He comes across as a crackpot. He wouldn’t know who was deluding him and who was telling the truth. He lacks the technical expertise. I think he’s hurting the case that the election was fraudulent.
We will never know. We know too many votes were cast.
As to 2. That is highly doubtful.
the responses so far in this thread are not lining up with the fundamental claim Lindell is making. It is not just being able to ID packets from China. It is that these packets had a definite destination. He is claiming to have linked Source A (china) with Target B (The Dominion Machines in specific locations). If this can be established and not refuted, he wins. Then we have a problem.
There was not supposed to be a door. There was. That’s the point. Dominion left a door open.
If Dennis Montgomery is involved its fake & he’s scamming Lindell !
That’s not the point of our questions. The point is, “Who was running the network capture that Lindell claims to have, and how did that person have access to the network at the polling site(s)?” I can well imagine Dominion leaving an open port, but I want to know the source of the packets used in Lindell’s analysis.
Thanks. If you really know how this stuff works it is funny/absurd. As absurd as a claim that some low level imbeciles have packets from the SWIFT network and can prove payoffs to Hunter from the Chicoms.
I never heard that claim as Lindell was showing us how the machines were manipulated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.