The "Download" block for the .pdf is to the left of the Title at the source article.
Peer reviewed study analysis has now been released.
This should surprise nobody that has been watching this for the past 3-4 months.
It is too bad that the scientists did not “follow the science” a long time ago in this pandemic. Instead they were political.
I also suggest you look at the list of writers involved and the information listed as:
“author Information” (it is a link)
I am puzzled why this is listed as General Chat.
I looked back that was not how I entered it.
Very strange.
What if a safe drug that has been in use for 40 years was found effective as a treatment and preventative for Covid?
What if the only way an experimental vaccine could be given emergency authorization was if there were no known alternative treatments?
What if Big Pharma and NIH are a giant revolving door of personnel?
What if Big Pharma gives billions in advertising dollars to the media and Big tech?
It is interesting that it is listed as preventing gettung COVID
I wonder if Docs can prescribe it?
“Trust the science” Fauci said for over a year that there is no safe and effective cv19 treatment. The vax pushing m****r accessories here claim that it doesn’t work, by a simple hand wave. The science says that it works. MATH+ also works. So does the Brownstein protocol.
There is no pandemic. Just a Pharma-Gates-Fauci operation to promote the experimental gene therapy.
It doesn't surprise me, it is a conglomeration of 3rd world studies. Well that's not completely true there was one study from Spain with 24 patient's under study (why even include that?).
This article is not proof that Ivermectin works. It is suggestive that Ivermectin should be studied in a larger clinical trial by a first world medical system. For that reason this study is important as it brings together data to show ivermectin needs to be studied further.
The papers studied in this meta analysis have varied dosing on ivermectin. So we still have no proof of what an optimal dose of ivermectin is (keyword is proof, I know various doctors have suggested a dosing range, so we need statistical proof).
As drugs go Ivermectin is relatively harmless. If you get COVID-19 and want to take I have no problem with you using the medication in conjunction with your doctor. At best it might have an effect. At worst you may have some mild side effect from the drug and get sick from COVID-19 anyway.
If you are trying to convince me that Ivermectin is a statistically proven treatment for COVID-19, I'm afraid the drug will have to jump through a few more hoops.
P4L
Conclusions:Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
600,000 deaths later
but at least they got rid of orange man bad
There is a 27 page document that I suggest you download.
The “Download” block for the .pdf is to the left of the Title at the source article.