Posted on 06/19/2021 6:22:55 AM PDT by Enlightened1
Of the 700 physicians responding to an internet survey by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), nearly 60 percent said they were not “fully vaccinated” against COVID.
This contrasts with the claim by the American Medical Association that 96 percent of practicing physicians are fully vaccinated. This was based on 300 respondents.
Neither survey represents a random sample of all American physicians, but the AAPS survey shows that physician support for the mass injection campaign is far from unanimous.
“It is wrong to call a person who declines a shot an ‘anti-vaxxer,’” states AAPS executive director Jane Orient, M.D. “Virtually no physicians are ‘anti-antibiotics’ or ‘anti-surgery,’ whereas all are opposed to treatments that they think are unnecessary, more likely to harm than to benefit an individual patient, or inadequately tested.”
The AAPS survey also showed that 54 percent of physician respondents were aware of patients suffering a “significant adverse reaction.” Of the unvaccinated physicians, 80 percent said “I believe risk of shots exceeds risk of disease,” and 30% said “I already had COVID.”
Other reasons for declining the shot included unknown long-term effects, use of aborted fetal tissue, “it’s experimental,” availability of effective early treatment, and reports of deaths and blood clots.
Of 560 practicing physicians, 56 percent said they offered early treatment for COVID.
Nonphysicians were also invited to participate in the survey. Of some 5,300 total participants, 2,548 volunteered comments about associated adverse effects of which they were aware. These included death, amputation, paralysis, stillbirth, menstrual irregularities, blindness, seizures, and heart issues.
“Causality is not proven. However, many of these episodes might have resulted in a huge product liability or malpractice award if they had occurred after a new drug,” stated Dr. Orient. “Purveyors of these COVID products are protected against lawsuits.”
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons has represented physicians in all specialties since 1943. Its motto is omnia pro aegroto, everything for the patient.
First of all, that’s EX Gman to you, but only if you consider US Military service.
Secondly, I have never uttered a word of support for Fauci anywhere, not here, not in private life.
Third, I have never thought that it was anyone’s business whether somebody is vaxed, And have never advocated vax.
Lastly, I am delighted with the daily humor Qtards provide us with on this forum. More fun than a barrel of monkeys.
Of note: You managed to cram more lies into a single sentence that anyone I’ve witnessed on Free Republic in 22 years.
Is that more of those magical Qtardation powers?
Again, keep me on this list.
You’re the guy who won’t answer questions, but calls me the liar.
Again, I have NO idea what your q obsession is all about, but, we see you’ve got it bad. For some reason you mention qtard, a lot.
So, take your name calling and total obfuscation and buzz off.
You have, however, clearly proven your obsession and that YOU manage the list.
I’ll add you on to the jack wagon list, if I start one. 😉
“You’re the guy who won’t answer questions, but calls me the liar.”
Absolutely correct.
I have no time for silly Qtards.
And you’re a liar.
Get help!
Maybe one of the FRoctor Quacktors can help you, old fool.
And, back to thread....
Thank you, E1, for posting this thread and proof...that the majority of docs are steering clear of these risky shots.
Very telling!
I am just trying to help people make an informed decision.
The fact there is so much censorship about this should be a red flag to anyone.
The jab takers love to call people anti-vaxxers. Which is 100% false. know a lot of people including myself that have had vaccines. I have probably had more than most people since I served in the military. Yet hat does not automatically translated to all vaccines are good. This one is not even FDA approved. There are no papers, which are required by law of what it does, when you get the vaccine because the human trials are now until 2023. The only papers people are signing is they will not anyone liable for if something goes wrong. Another red flag.
If people want to take it, then I think they should be able to. However, the pro-vaxxers should not be giving anyone a hard time to anyone that does not want to be lab rats.
Have a bad feeling about this that the doctors that warn not to take the 2 vaccines are correct since they are being silenced. The sad thing people are so trusting and do not even question what they are being told.
What is crazy is if you look at vaccines that were pulled. Most got pulled very quickly when people started dying in the past. The highest number of deaths, before this one that got pulled, was around 156 deaths in the 1970s? This has over 24,000 that was confirmed and reported to the CDC and NIH. Which they say somewhere 1 to 10% of all deaths reported. Since not everyone reports it. Keep in mind these are quick deaths.
The doctors that are warning not to take it are saying it is a soft kill and will kill most jab takers in 3 to 5 years. They will be lucky if they live 10 years, and that is for young people.
Whenever I start showing pro-vaxxers the data. They run away from it or freak out. This is even though it’s coming from actual science and medical doctors.
I guess people do not want to believe that people wearing a white medical coat could be wrong?
Here is another way to look at it also. If I am wrong, then I can always take the vaccine 5 to 10 years from now if it turns out they are safe. Although if I am right, then I am alive and they are dead. Cannot understand why anyone would gamble their life a year later if they are perfectly healthy with an experimental mRNA?
Grammar is off.
Go to the common room. If you can't find a mirror, ask the orderly. They're usually nice in those places.
You vaxtards crack me up. You spout the Fauci/CDC/Bill Gates line word for word, then pretend to badmouth Fauci out of the other side of your neck, hoping to maintain your 'conservative' cred.
The intellectual dishonesty is palpable. And you think we smarts don't notice this dichotomy?
The same abby normal brain that makes you think you can get away with THAT canard, is the same dysfunctional brain that makes you support the Fauci agenda in the first place.
That's pretty much the definition of a vaxtard, since you asked.
Oh, p.s. That soft brain of yours is also the reason you can't understand what Q is.
Its all a form of mild retardation, really.
But you seem nice.
“You vaxtards crack me up. You spout the Fauci/CDC/Bill Gates line word for word, then pretend to badmouth Fauci out of the other side of your neck, hoping to maintain your ‘conservative’ cred.”
You can’t cite a single example of that, for me.
For you? How cute.
Of course I can. You are a walking ball of old man hate, and the enemy of positivity. You attack all that is good and light, because you are dark. And nobody likes you. This is known.
You stand against real America's (MAGA) agenda and with the derp state enemy, and now with the Chinese enemy. You support the vax and attack those of us who understand the reality of what's going on. You're too dull to understand that the fake vax isn't just a fake vax, but it is just another finger on the enemy's hand.
The hand that grasps for power and the destruction of what we have always known this country to be. The destruction of the very people who built this country. TAnd the destruction of the last patriots.
That is a description of not only you, but every single ignorant vaxtard engaged in this 'vax war' that we are being distracted by.
I know that's a lot to absorb and you will mock it with your creaky, sour, decrepit old man voice, croaking away like you do. But that's just more proof you are incapable of understanding.
So don't back peddle now, Fauci's man.
Here's the thing, really old guy.
You can't run your mouth about the Fauci/CDC/FDA/NIH/WHO/Gates/China corona/vax op and then turn around and pretend you're against them out of the other side of your wrinkled, misshapen neck.
The common thread is, you and them are all on the same page. So what makes you any different? Cite THAT.
I could respect you if you picked one side or the other. Patriots and enemies of China and the derp state on the one hand (me), and Chinese, derp state, Fauci loving, Bill Gates leg humping, Joe Biden hair sniffing, collaborators on the other (you).
It does you no good to deny all the enemy, but keep the enemy's policy.
So, suck it up. Admit what you are, the enemy to good people everywhere. You'll feel better.
Oh, by the way. You earned your lifetime membership on the naughty list years ago (since you asked). There's no coming back.
Sorry, old timer. The good news is, you are now a vax mutated 'other', and can start a whole new life as something different than a human being. So you got that goin' for ya.
Congrats. See you on the Island of Dr Moreau.
Yes, I am your enemy.
It’s good you finally know it too.
This is not new information. There was never any doubt.
Do you speak Mandarin or Cantonese?
The question is, Ancient Mariner, are you a worthy enemy, or are you well past your sell-by date?
“This is not new information. There was never any doubt.”
Have you ever seen a man on the waterboard? Not the movie version, but in real life and with malicious intent?
I’ve seen several, up close and personal. And I have been on the waterboard myself.
When done properly, you can make a man say or do anything you damn well please. In 100% of cases.
Even when the pronounce they would die before saying or doing those things.
I recommend everyone avoid the waterboard.
Well, ain't you a bad hombre. Look out for you.
Hate to break it to ya, Grampy, but your waterboarding days are long gone.
Take up bingo.
It’s a shame such a good article wound up in the chat ghetto.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.