Posted on 06/06/2021 12:30:45 PM PDT by ransomnote
ransomnote: WelcomeTheEagle88 is a highly qualified medical data analyst who has been tracking the data for Covid 19 'vaccines' as the CDC publishes some of the records it has received every Friday.
At the end of January, his earlier videos showed 36 million doses of the Covid 'vaccines' had been administered. At that point in time, VAERS had published reports of 336 deaths following vaccination. There was, at the time, concern what this might mean in relation to product safety.
As of June 4, with the continued uploading of more old records from December and January, we now know that there were actually over 2000 reports of deaths to VAERS at the end of January, not just the originally reported 336.
Note: 750 of these deaths newly published records were designated "foreign" which would not be territories (Guam) but are more likely military or other overseas personnel.
The following is the description of the video provided by WelcomeTheEagle88: "The great majority of newly published ~750+ Deaths are coming from jabs in January or older! This revelation should change everything! Bottom line VAERS has now published 2000+ deaths January or older generated from the first 36 million doses only! Sheeple please wake up, that's 2K deaths for 36M doses so far!"
[ransomnote: How is anyone able to monitor Covid 'vaccine' safety while the CDC selectively decides which reports to publish, delete or delay? The CDC just released a video extolling the safety of the 'vaccines,' assuring the public that "...these vaccines have undergone the most intensive safety monitoring in U.S. history." In reality, we're witnessing the first time an experimental vaccine has been administered world-wide in high-pressure, incentivized campaigns while the 'products' are still in Phase III trials!]
This latest Bitchute video by WelcomeTheEagle provides a brief overview and is 8 minutes in length. In the graph below, my cursor is shown positioned over the vertical line indicating his data cutoff point (Jan 31) at which 36 million doses had been administered, and 2000 deaths are reported for that time period.
So about 40% of all reports of deaths the CDC elected to publish to date occurred during the first 12% (36 million doses), of a total of 299 million doses administered as of 6/4/2021.
There are continuing indications the CDC is selectively withholding reports of serious impacts (strokes, heart attacks, deaths etc.).
Maintaining reports months behind schedule, selectively deleting or delaying reports, throttling back the flow of published reports to a trickle or mostly reporting old vaccination data from months go is proof the CDC, by choice, is not doing its job.
The projections and estimates are devastating. The CDC must release records, share with the public its early list of potential side-effects, halt the incentives (money, donuts, tickets) and provide genuine risk benefit analysis. The administration of these toxic, useless, needless 'shots' must stop.
Your guess is as good as mine. But my guess is that the vaccines causes fewer long term effects than the virus itself. Less clotting, less cardiovascular damage.
I believe if you had true numerator and denominator for both you would find that gap tighten.
We all know your numerator as well as your denominator are not correct for covid cases. We also know the numerator for vaccines is not true. The only true number we have is the denominator for vaccines.
As I said, math does not work like that. Your percentages are useless.
These are not vaccine, science experiment is more like it, and a bad one at that. Many more people to from vaxxing.
If you buy that number.
Th fight against COVID is a war. As in ALL wars there is collateral damage and collateral deaths. For too many it is not worth the fight. They are wearing too much YELLOW paint.
What we should all be asking, is why, during a mass experimental vaccine campaign, do we not have an active system like vaers going, as opposed to this passive one?
We should be actively monitoring every single person who took the experimental, the duration should be 10yrs minimum.
I think it was Harvard who recieved a grant to do an active system but we did not let them move forward after excellent results with the active system. The insight gained during the active trial was worth its weight in gold, information wise.
“Your guess is as good as mine.”
Exactly.
Thanks for being honest. You’re the first person here to answer that simple question the last ~20 times I’ve asked it. You don’t know, I don’t know, and St. Fauci surely doesn’t either.
I even suspect you’re right about the balance of values and odds of success. It’ll probably turn out to be a net good, I’m guessing. But we don’t know yet.
I have the luxury of good current health and an age of 59 years. In a few more years’ time, more will be known about the risks of the jab, and my risks will increase. Barring horrible outcomes, I’ll probably take it in 3-4 years.
But vax absolutists can’t answer that simple question well like you did, or even have a discussion without their heads exploding.
Humanity is interesitng, ain’t it?
The vaccine industry is pure evil and fraud
The “immunizatin”. theory is false. Probably so
History of the evil cartel. Look they’re VERY DEVIOUS
VAXTRUTH
VACTRUTH.
The fact that the federales can’t hijack the sites and redirect you to “immunize.com “. means that we’ve won
This is a war for children’s souls
which has been going on for 100 years now
Now do the math for teenagers.
The voyage of Christopher Columbus was a science experiment. The launch of Apollo 11's Saturn V rocket to the moon was a science experiment. Funny thing. Both experiments worked!
A guess.
That’s some real solid science with which to risk my health on.
And why does everyone who pushes the vax ignore the data from those treated prophylactically by HCQ or Ivermectin?
Why not just take he ivermectin protocol instead? Much safer and at least as effective as the vaccine.
Good question.
I see you have looked into the “immunizatin” (spelled immunization) theory. Tell me, what is the significance of the lipid nanoparticle?
The chart is cool. Except it would be interesting to “normalize” the results. Is there another vaccine given in the past year that comes close the volume of the Covid Vaxes?
Hardly any of the arguments related to the Covid Vaccines are done in a way that represents anything close to an academic assessment. They are as emotional as the arguments made by liberals to wear masks.
Has it dawned on either side they are being “played?”
Okay so 2000/36 million= 1 in 18,000 or 0.005%.
Still much lower than 1.6% case fatality rate of the diagnosed covid cases.
So the vaccine still appear to be far safer than getting covid. But the vaccine is not "perfectly safe".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SO it looks like you are willfully distorting the data. Count me 'not surprised.'
1 in 18,000 is .055555 % or one hundred time larger than your calculation.
According to rounding rules, that's .06%
There are numerous ways the CDC is suppressing 'certain records' and in the instance of Covid-19, they are doing everything they can to keep reports out of VAERS so 'normal' estimates of vast underreporting go out the door.
For example, many VAERS records for Covid-19 are ER visits in which the patient is stabilized from heart attack, stroke etc. They are then transferred out and no update is ever conducted to report whether they lived or not. There are long-term effects which are common to mRNA technology (ADE, autoimmune illnesses). The actual death rate is much, much higher and can involve a medical decline of days, weeks, months.
When you compare the case fatality rate, you are not conducting an apples to apples comparison. If someone gets Covid-19, they usually get over it. Some of the vulnerable do not. After contending with Covid-19, if they did not get the 'vaccine', the person has immunity from repeat infections from Covid-19.
The 'vaccine' death rate is worse because VAERS is a snapshot of what will be many years of ongoing medical problems and complications as the body continues to create billions of spike proteins which may or may not trigger allergic reactions, autoimmunity, heart damage, brain damage, strokes etc. We are only 6 months into a lasting problem.
Then, supposedly to 'maintain' fake immunity (vaccinated still get Covid and are likely to get it more severely per the history of mRNA technology) a person is expected to keep getting more vaccinations, increasing the damage, inccuring the same or increasing death rates with each injection.
There is no comparrison. The 'vaccines' are a horror show intentionally inflicted on the public. Safe, effective FDA approved medications in use for decades have been available but denied to those ill with Covid. If the public had been permitted treatment when they were ill, the fake death statistics would be a fraction of what they are today.
The CDC released reports MAY 5, one of which indicated that only 5% of the 500K+ deaths attributed from Covid-19 were from 'Covid-19 alone'. The other 95% of the deaths were from people who had an average of 4 other co-morbidities (Hint: many didn't die from Covid).
The PCR test does not detect the Covid-19 virus nor the Covid illness. So those who died and are attributed as "Covid-19 only" did so from a mixture of respiratory illnesses.
Because all medications were withheld from anyone testing postive from a PCR 'test' (which had a 97% false positive rate), people with respiratory diseases for which even the CDC would allow treatment were misdiagnosed with Covid and denied all treatment.
So the CDC, Fauci and others are responsible for the deaths of those from whom they withheld treatment by falsely maligning HCQ/Ivermectin, and they are responsible for the needless deaths of those having the 'vaccine'.
Deaths are not the only problem with Covid 'vaccines'. Active people stricken with life changing, shortening, limiting conditions requiring support services and continuing treatment are suffering too. People who get over illnesses attributed to "Covid-19" fare so much better.
Better actually, because natural immunity from having the disease is far superior to anything any vaccine ever conferred.
So around 100 die from flu shot every year compared to 1000’s dieing from these synthetic chemical devices reclassified as vaccines, yet we’re still full steam ahead.
Exactly right. And yet they still are trying to convince those that have natural immunity to vaccinate. What kind of craziness is that?
I goofed my math.
Your .005% is correct for 2000/36 million.
Everything else you said to diminish the actual damage caused by ‘vaccines’ is not correct. I describe some of the ways your comparisons of death rate to potential harm caused by ‘vaccines’ (VAERS) is not true in my prior post.
An example I didn’t list, and the reason why my calculation was wrong, is that 1% or less of real world deaths after vaccination are reported to VAERS.
So 100 X .005% then gets the .5% I posted. (correcting for reports to CDC and adding adverse events not reported).
‘Case rate’ is invalid due to exaggerating statistics but why not compare it to risk of dying (tiny) versus risk of harm from any single ‘vaccination’ dose’? That would be more accurate.
For the vulnerable people at risk of dying from Covid-19, medication protocols are available which cut the risk of death by 85%
Use real numbers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.