Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN

I goofed my math.
Your .005% is correct for 2000/36 million.

Everything else you said to diminish the actual damage caused by ‘vaccines’ is not correct. I describe some of the ways your comparisons of death rate to potential harm caused by ‘vaccines’ (VAERS) is not true in my prior post.

An example I didn’t list, and the reason why my calculation was wrong, is that 1% or less of real world deaths after vaccination are reported to VAERS.

So 100 X .005% then gets the .5% I posted. (correcting for reports to CDC and adding adverse events not reported).

‘Case rate’ is invalid due to exaggerating statistics but why not compare it to risk of dying (tiny) versus risk of harm from any single ‘vaccination’ dose’? That would be more accurate.

For the vulnerable people at risk of dying from Covid-19, medication protocols are available which cut the risk of death by 85%

Use real numbers.


40 posted on 06/06/2021 1:36:30 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote
"...1% or less of real world deaths after vaccination are rep"

So you're saying instead of 5000 deaths, we've actually had 500,000 deaths from vaccinations?

Sorry that doesn't pass the smell test. I think it would be obvious if the vaccination death count was that high.

60 posted on 06/06/2021 2:26:19 PM PDT by DannyTN (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson