Posted on 06/03/2021 5:46:39 PM PDT by Libloather
PHOENIX - Another strange twist in the 2020 Maricopa County Election audit has brought us to a remote location in Montana, for reasons that aren't abundantly clear at this point.
What we know: A copy of the election data from Maricopa County's servers and hard drives was sent by controversial contractor CyberNinjas to the Montana home of a technology company president who accused the county of deleting a voter database.
According to a note on the Arizona Secretary of State website, an observer for Katie Hobbs' office noted that the state Senate audit liaison, Ken Bennett, confirmed on May 24 that copies of voting system data were sent to a lab in Montana.
The observer noted that Bennett did not specify what security measures were in place, what the lab in Montana is doing with the data or how long it will have the copies of voting system data.
Bennett on Thursday confirmed the data was shipped to Montana to 12 News.
The data is, according to Bennett, a copy of the data created by Dominion Voting Services from hard drives and servers that Maricopa County delivered to the state Senate in response to a subpoena. The data was then handed over to Cyber Ninjas, the controversial firm that is "auditing" the election records.
"The original evidence was left completely intact," Bennett told 12 News. "A copy was taken to do whatever evaluation they are doing for Cyber Ninjas."
It was shipped to a company called Cyber Technology Services.
Azcentral.com Maricopa County reporter Jen Fifield reported on June 1 that Cyber Technology Services (CyTech) is an affiliate company of CyFIR LLC. CyFIR is a digital security company working as a subcontractor for Cyber Ninjas, the Florida-based cybersecurity company that the Arizona Senate Republicans chose to run the audit.
(Excerpt) Read more at 12news.com ...
Great, now we have to endure the story of an unguarded testing facility in Montana being broken into.
I know it will be hard, but the Republicans will find a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. They always do.
If that's true (and at this point, just about anything is believable), that's absolutely absurd. The only reason to 'adjudicate' 60% of the votes would be to steal an election, period. I would say eyeballing more 2% maybe 3% of total ballots would be incredibly suspect.
It was Beth on the Yellowstone Ranch.
I’ve read many bent articles, but the bias in this ne jumps out with every word. Is there anyone left who is so naive that they don’t recognize this as partisan propaganda?
“Another strange twist...” [Uh, what’s strange about sending the data for evaluation by an expert? It’s called an “audit”.]
“remote location in Montana... [Ooooo remote is so scary, must be a White Supremacy HQ...]
“for reasons that aren’t abundantly clear at this point”. [let me guess — cyber experts are going to evaluate the data?]
“sent by controversial contractor CyberNinjas [if media says ‘controversial” enough times it must be true...]
“to the Montana home of a technology company president who accused the county of deleting a voter database. [IOW, to a well-known cybersecurity expert, so he can evaluate the material with his own gear at hand and without travel expenses?]
“...an observer for Katie Hobbs’ office noted that the state Senate audit liaison” [So a partisan Democrat is puffing a story out of nothing?]
“Ken Bennett, confirmed on May 24 that copies of voting system data were sent to a lab in Montana.” [Hmm, so there is nothing secretive about any of this...]
The observer noted that Bennett did not specify what security measures were in place, what the lab in Montana is doing with the data or how long it will have the copies of voting system data. [Oh noes! Smarter people would have spewed the entire security plan so it’s easier to overcome].
“to Cyber Ninjas, the controversial firm that is “auditing” the election records. [So...their style sheet requires coupling “controversial” with every iteration of “Cyber Ninjas” Does “auditing” in quotes mean they aren’t really auditing the election data, but doing something nefarious, like turning the votes into killer Covid viruses in a Chinese lab?]
Most transparent gaslighting ever.
Yep.
Funny how that got buried.
When the vote counting stops, the Vote fabrication begins.
I don't doubt that the voting fraud was massive, and unprecedented, in 2020 - I was just wondering if anyone knew the time that these 'swing' States shutdown on the night of 11/3.
I.e., how obvious was the coordination?
It doesn't really matter - this audit needs to be done in all of the swing States.
“ Instead, I think eyeballing ambiguous (for whatever reason) ballots and ‘discerning the will of the voter’ like a mystical soothsayer could only tilt a very close election, like the recounts you mention.”
You need to look at the bigger picture.
There is evidence that ballots in Republican strongholds were adjucated at a far higher rate than those in Democrat strongholds. Adjucation allows a poll worker to cast the vote however they want. If you intentionally force adjucation in select areas, you can make huge changes.
According to a note on the Arizona Secretary of State website, an observer for Katie Hobbs' office noted that the state Senate audit liaison, Ken Bennett, confirmed on May 24 that copies of voting system data were sent to a lab in Montana.
This is coming from the office of the woman is the primary architect of the fraudulent election vote in Arizona and has opposed the audit from the beginning-- plus she just announced she is running for governor. Don't you think that maybe-- just maybe-- any allegations and innuendos by her are total disinformation and propaganda and are worthy of ZERO consideration?
I am hearing adjudication rate in Maricopa county was 11% when normal has been 3% in past elections.
Yup. The MSM is attempting to malign the cyber investigation company and cast doubt on the audit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.